Impetigo Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Comparative, Multicenter Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Retapamulin Ointment, 1%, Versus Oral Linezolid in the Treatment of Secondarily-Infected Traumatic Lesions and Impetigo Due to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Verified date | February 2012 |
Source | GlaxoSmithKline |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to provide further evidence of the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of retapamulin in the treatment of subjects with SITL or impetigo due to MRSA. Subjects aged 2 months and older will be treated with either topical retapamulin for 5 days or oral linezolid for 10 days. The primary endpoint is the clinical response at follow-up (7-9 days after the end of therapy) in subjects who have a MRSA infection at baseline. The primary population is the per-protocol MRSA population. It is anticipated that approximately 500 subjects may be enrolled in order to obtain approximately 105 subjects who have a baseline MRSA infection.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 410 |
Est. completion date | August 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | July 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 2 Months and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - 2 months of age or older - diagnosis of secondarily-infected traumatic lesion (SITL) or impetigo (bullous or non-bullous) - negative urine pregnancy test (females of childbearing potential) - total skin infection rating scale (SIRS) score of at least 8, which must include a pus/exudate score of at least 3 - subject or parent/legal guardian willing and able to comply with protocol - written informed, dated consent, and written assent (if applicable) Exclusion Criteria: - previous hypersensitivity to pleuromutilins or oxazolidinones - phenylketonuria or known hypersensitivity to aspartame - secondarily-infected animal/human bite, or puncture wound - abscess - chronic ulcerative lesion - underlying skin disease (eg, eczematous dermatitis) with secondary infection - systemic signs and symptoms of infection - skin infection not appropriate for treatment by a topical antibiotic (eg, extensive cellulitis, furunculosis) - subject requires surgical intervention for infection prior to study or likely will during the study - receipt of systemic antibacterial or steroid, or application of any topical therapeutic agent directly to wound within 24 hours of entry into the study - subject currently receiving adrenergic agents - subject currently receiving serotonergic agents - history of pseudomembranous colitis - known, pre-existing myelosuppression, history of myelosuppression with linezolid use, or receiving a medication that produces bone marrow suppression - history of siezures - history of severe renal failure and undergoing dialysis - serious underlying disease that could be imminently life-threatening - pregnant, breast feeding or planning a pregnancy, or not using accepted method of contraception (females of childbearing potential or <1 year post-menopausal) - use of another investigational drug within 30 days prior to entry into this study - previously enrolled in this study - fructose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption or sucrase-isomaltase insufficiency (for subjects <12 years of age receiving linezolid suspension) |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Anniston | Alabama |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Atlantis | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Austin | Texas |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Bakerfield | California |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Bay Pines | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Bell Gardens | California |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Bentonville | Arkansas |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Birmingham | Alabama |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Brooklyn | New York |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Butte | Montana |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Carlisle | Ohio |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Charlottesville | Virginia |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Columbus | Georgia |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Corvallis | Oregon |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Duncanville | Texas |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Fort Lauderdale | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Ft. Lauderdale | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Grand Blanc | Michigan |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Gresham | Oregon |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Honolulu | Hawaii |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Honolulu | Hawaii |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Houston | Texas |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Huntington Beach | California |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Jackson | Mississippi |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Jonesboro | Arkansas |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Layton | Utah |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Long Beach | California |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Louisville | Kentucky |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Macon | Georgia |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Miami | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | New Orleans | Louisiana |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Omaha | Nebraska |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Overland Park | Kansas |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Paragould | Arkansas |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Pensacola | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Portland | Oregon |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Roseville | California |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Sacramento | California |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Savannah | Georgia |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Seattle | Washington |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | St. Petersburg | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Tulsa | Oklahoma |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | Vero Beach | Florida |
United States | GSK Investigational Site | West Palm Beach | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Stiefel, a GSK Company | GlaxoSmithKline |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Number of Participants Achieving Clinical Response at Follow-up Who Had Methicillin-resistant Staphlococcus Aureus (MRSA) as a Baseline Pathogen | Follow-up is defined as 7-9 days post-therapy: Day 12-14 for retapamulin; Day 17-19 for linezolid. Clinical success at follow-up was defined as the resolution of clinically meaningful signs and symptoms of infection recorded at baseline, including a pus/exudate skin infection rating scale (SIRS) score of "0." The SIRS is used by the investigator to evaluate infected lesions. Scores on the SIRS range from 0 (absent) to 6 (severe). | 7-9 days post-therapy; Day 12-14 for retapamulin and Day 17-19 for linezolid | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving Microbiological Response (MR) at Follow-up (FU) Who Had MRSA as a Baseline Pathogen (BP) | MR was defined as microbiological success if, (1) for participants (par.) whose clinical outcome at end of therapy (EOT) was "clinical success (CS)/improvement," the BP was eradicated/presumed to be eradicated at EOT, or the BP was present at EOT and absent at FU, or the BP was eradicated/presumed to be eradicated at EOT, or the BP was present at EOT and par. was a "CS" such that no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material secondary to adequate clinical response; or (2) a pathogen not previously identified at baseline was isolated at FU in a par. identified at FU as a "CS." | 7-9 days post-therapy; Day 12-14 for retapamulin and Day 17-19 for linezolid | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-up | Follow-up is defined as 7-9 days post-therapy: Day 12-14 for retapamulin; Day 17-19 for linezolid. Clinical success at follow-up was defined as the resolution of clinically meaningful signs and symptoms of infection recorded at baseline, including a pus/exudate skin infection rating scale (SIRS) score of "0." The SIRS is used by the investigator to evaluate infected lesions. Scores on the SIRS range from 0 (absent) to 6 (severe). | 7-9 days post-therapy; Day 12-14 for retapamulin and Day 17-19 for linezolid | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants Who Achieved Microbiological Response (MR) at Follow-up (FU) Who Had a Baseline Pathogen (BP) | MR was defined as microbiological success if, (1) for participants (par.) whose clinical outcome at end of therapy (EOT) was "clinical success (CS)/improvement," the BP was eradicated/presumed to be eradicated at EOT, or the BP was present at EOT and absent at FU, or the BP was eradicated/presumed to be eradicated at EOT, or the BP was present at EOT and par. was a "CS" such that no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material secondary to adequate clinical response; or (2) a pathogen not previously identified at baseline was isolated at FU in a par. identified at FU as a "CS." | 7-9 days post-therapy; Day 12-14 for retapamulin and Day 17-19 for linezolid | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at the End of Therapy Who Had MRSA as a Baseline Pathogen | Clinical improvement is defined as improvement of signs/symptoms of infection recorded at baseline (BL) to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy is necessary. Clinical failure (CF) is defined as insufficient improvement/deterioration of signs/symptoms of the infection recorded at BL, such that additional antibiotic therapy is required. Unable to determine (UTD) is defined as refusal to consent to a clinical examination, lost to follow-up. Participants who are "CF"/"Unable to Determine" at end of therapy are considered such at follow-up as well. | 2-4 days post-therapy; Day 7-9 for retapamulin and Day 12-14 for linezolid | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at the End of Therapy Who Had MRSA as a Baseline (BL) Pathogen | Eradication is the elimination of BL pathogens. Presumed eradication and presumed improvement are clinical outcomes of success or improvement, respectively, such that no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material, secondary to adequate clinical response, and is documented in the electronic Case Report Form. Persistence is defined as BL pathogens still being present. Presumed persistence is defined as a participant that is a clinical failure with no obtained culture. "Unable to determine" was used if no determination of BL pathogen microbiological response could be made. | 2-4 days post-therapy; Day 7-9 for retapamulin and Day 12-14 for linezolid | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With the Indicated Clinical Outcome at the End of Therapy | Clinical improvement is defined as improvement of signs/symptoms of infection recorded at baseline (BL) to such an extent that no further antimicrobial therapy is necessary. Clinical failure (CF) is defined as insufficient improvement/deterioration of signs/symptoms of the infection recorded at BL, such that additional antibiotic therapy is required. Unable to determine (UTD) is defined as refusal to consent to a clinical examination, lost to follow-up. Participants who are "CF"/"Unable to Determine" at end of therapy are considered such at follow-up as well. | 2-4 days post-therapy; Day 7-9 for retapamulin and Day 12-14 for linezolid | No |
Secondary | Number of Baseline Pathogens With the Indicated Microbiological Outcome at the End of Therapy | Eradication is the elimination of BL pathogens. Presumed eradication and presumed improvement are clinical outcomes of success or improvement, respectively, such that no culture was obtained due to lack of culturable material, secondary to adequate clinical response, and is documented in the electronic Case Report Form. Persistence is defined as BL pathogens still being present. Presumed persistence is defined as a participant that is a clinical failure with no obtained culture. "Unable to determine" was used if no determination of BL pathogen microbiological response could be made. | 2-4 days post-therapy; Day 7-9 for retapamulin and Day 12-14 for linezolid | No |
Secondary | Number of Participants With Therapeutic Response at Follow-up | Therapeutic response is defined as the combined clinical and microbiological response. Therapeutic response iss a measure of the overall efficacy response, and a therapeutic success refers to participants who had been deemed both a "clinical success" and a "microbiological success." All other combinations (other than "clinical success" + "microbiological success") were deemed failures for therapeutic response. | 7-9 days post-therapy; Day 12-14 for retapamulin and Day 17-19 for linezolid | No |
Secondary | Mean Scores on the Skin Infection Rating Scale at Visits 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 | The investigator evaluated skin infections by grading the infected lesion for exudate (a fluid that leaks out of blood vessels into surrounding tissue)/pus, crusting, erythema (redness of the skin)/ inflammation (E/I), tissue warmth, tissue edema (swelling), itching, and pain, according to the Skin Infection Rating Scale. All parameters were graded on a scale of 0 (absent) to 6 (severe). The total score is calculated by summing the individual scores from the 7 parameters; the total score ranges from 0 to 42. | Visits 1 (Day 1), 2 (Day 3-4), 3 (Day 7-9), 4 (Day 12-14), and 5 (Day 17-19) | No |
Secondary | Mean Wound Size at Visits 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 | Lesion sized was measured in centimeters squared at Visits 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. | Visits 1 (Day 1), 2 (Day 3-4), 3 (Day 7-9), 4 (Day 12-14), and 5 (Day 17-19) | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00884728 -
Evaluation of a Regional Healthy Skin Program in Remote Aboriginal Communities of Australia's Northern Territory
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02902822 -
Tele-dermatology of Skin Cancer in a Cohort of Local Health Authority Employees in the Province of Bergamo
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01153828 -
EU PV for Retapamulin-Prescribing
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05226260 -
Decreasing Antibiotic Duration for Skin and Soft Tissue Infection Using Behavioral Economics in Primary Care
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00986856 -
Fucidin® Cream in the Treatment of Impetigo
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01397461 -
Efficacy and Safety of Ozenoxacin 1% Cream Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients With Impetigo
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02090764 -
Efficacy and Safety of Ozenoxacin 1% Cream Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Patients With Impetigo
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02775617 -
Azithromycin - Ivermectin Mass Drug Administration for Skin Disease
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT01611909 -
Citriodiol® and Impetigo
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03177993 -
Fiji Integrated Therapy (FIT) - Triple Therapy for Lymphatic Filariasis, Scabies and Soil Transmitted Helminths in Fiji
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03429595 -
Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, PK, and Activity of Topical ATx201 Gel in Outpatients With Impetigo
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04287777 -
Safety and Efficacy of Mupirocin Gel in Children With Impetigo
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00626795 -
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of TD1414 2% Cream in Impetigo and Secondarily Infected Traumatic Lesions (SITL)
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00758862 -
The Pharmacokinetics of 2% TD1414 Cream in Adults With Secondarily Infected Traumatic Lesions (SITL) or Impetigo
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01943136 -
The Efficacy and Safety of Topical Papaya (Carica Papaya) Leaf Extract 1% Ointment Versus Mupirocin 2% Ointment in the Treatment of Limited Impetigo: a Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Clinical Trial
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01670032 -
Vehicle Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study of Two Dose Regimens of CD07223 1.5% Topical Gel in Impetigo
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01171326 -
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topical Minocycline FXFM244 in Impetigo Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01367314 -
Safety and Efficacy of Topical NVC-422 Gel in Impetigo
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01126268 -
Twice Daily Altabax Application for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Soft Tissue Infection
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00133848 -
Treatment Of Impetigo With Topical SB-275833 Ointment, 1% Versus Topical Placebo Ointment
|
Phase 3 |