View clinical trials related to Impacted Third Molar Tooth.
Filter by:The objective of the study is to determine the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis with three different doses of clindamycin on preventing infection and other complications after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.
Third molar surgery is one of the most common procedures in oral surgery and the most common postoperative complications are swelling, pain, and trismus. This study aims to evaluate the postoperative morbidity (pain, swelling, and trismus) in third molar surgery performed using different degrees of cooled and room temperature irrigation solutions.
Accuracy of the variables used in Wharfe assessment and Pederson difficulty index for impacted mandibular third molar surgery. The lower 3rd molar tooth is one of the most frequently impacted teeth. Its prevalence ranges from 30.3% to 68.6% worldwide according to a study conducted by Sekhar, 2020. The impaction of a tooth can be defined as a pathological condition in which eruption of tooth is not normal i.e. it is not erupted as expected within a specific time period. The impaction renders the affected tooth as non-functional due to its postural instability/ abnormal position. The normal tooth eruption is dependent on several local as well as systemic factors. Normal eruption can be altered by neighboring tooth, excessive soft tissue in the surrounding, or the dense overlying bone. Race and Ethnicity an also affect/ alter the impaction rate. The removal of 3rd mandibular molar/ wisdom tooth is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures, being done in dental clinics on daily basis. To predict the difficulty level of this procedure for impacted lower 3rd molar, no scoring system/ scale is considered sufficient i.e. every scale takes some factors into account, while missing some factors, so clinically not very much reliable. Some of the proposed scales/ models which are clinically in use are as follows: WHARFE's, Pederson's, Winter's, and Pell and Gregory's model.
The tooth of the patient who applies to the clinic for the impacted wisdom tooth will be classified according to Escoda's difficulty classification. Before the extraction, patients' interincisal, tragus-commissural, and lateral canthus-angulus distances, Oral Health Impact Profile -14 (OHIP-14) scores, and serum levels of CRP and D-Dimer will be measured. Operation time will be recorded. After the operation, on 4th-day patients' patients' interincisal, tragus-commissural, and lateral canthus-angulus distances, Oral Health Impact Profile -14 (OHIP-14) scores, and serum levels of CRP and D-Dimer and Visual Analogue Scale (for pain) scores will be measured and recorded. On the 10th day, all these measurements will be repeated. All recorded data will be evaluated for possible correlations based on extraction difficulties.
Randomised control clinical trial to compare which combination of analgesics in effective in pain management after third molar extraction of wisdom teeth. The study will assess post operative pain after third molar extraction of two groups of study participants who will be given one of the two combinations of Diclofenac/ acetaminophen/codeine and ibuprofen/acetaminophen/codeine .
Natural honey and dexamethason will be given before impaction removal then postoperative complications will be evaluated
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive paracetamol in reducing intra operative pressure and post operative pain after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar using visual analogue scale
Removal of impacted lower third molar is considered as the most common surgical procedure carried out in the oral and maxillofacial Clinics. The surgical removal of the impacted mandibular third molar is usually associated with pain, swelling and inability to open the mouth. Those symptoms reach the maximum intensity between the third to fifth hours postoperatively for the pain and 24 to 48 hours postoperatively for the swelling and then, they gradually diminished until the 7th day postoperatively
Articaine is a common local anesthetic used in oral surgery and belongs to the amide group of it has fast onset with little side effects. Bupivacaine is preferred in prolonged surgical procedures with its long duration of action and residual analgesic effect. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic, analgesic, hemodynamic effects of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in extraction of impacted mandibular third molar teeth in intraoperative and postoperative periods. Hemodynamic parameters, onset of anesthetic action, total amount, intraoperative comfort, intraoperative bleeding, duration of postoperative anesthesia and analgesia, rescue analgesic use, maximum incisal opening and postoperative pain at 6th, 12th, 24th, 48th and 72th hours and 7th day using a visual analogue scale be evaluated.
The present study was to evaluate the effect of topical Arnica and MPSP application with respect to visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, maximal interincisal opening (MIO) and edema values after mandibular impacted third molar removal on days 1, 3, 5 and 10 postoperatively. The following null hypotheses of the present research were determined as follows: usage of topical agents would not influence i) VAS scores, ii) MIO values, and iii) edema values on 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th days after the mandibular impacted third molar surgery