View clinical trials related to Impacted Third Molar Tooth.
Filter by:The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of pre-emptive paracetamol in reducing intra operative pressure and post operative pain after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar using visual analogue scale
Removal of impacted lower third molar is considered as the most common surgical procedure carried out in the oral and maxillofacial Clinics. The surgical removal of the impacted mandibular third molar is usually associated with pain, swelling and inability to open the mouth. Those symptoms reach the maximum intensity between the third to fifth hours postoperatively for the pain and 24 to 48 hours postoperatively for the swelling and then, they gradually diminished until the 7th day postoperatively
Articaine is a common local anesthetic used in oral surgery and belongs to the amide group of it has fast onset with little side effects. Bupivacaine is preferred in prolonged surgical procedures with its long duration of action and residual analgesic effect. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anesthetic, analgesic, hemodynamic effects of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine in extraction of impacted mandibular third molar teeth in intraoperative and postoperative periods. Hemodynamic parameters, onset of anesthetic action, total amount, intraoperative comfort, intraoperative bleeding, duration of postoperative anesthesia and analgesia, rescue analgesic use, maximum incisal opening and postoperative pain at 6th, 12th, 24th, 48th and 72th hours and 7th day using a visual analogue scale be evaluated.
The present study was to evaluate the effect of topical Arnica and MPSP application with respect to visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, maximal interincisal opening (MIO) and edema values after mandibular impacted third molar removal on days 1, 3, 5 and 10 postoperatively. The following null hypotheses of the present research were determined as follows: usage of topical agents would not influence i) VAS scores, ii) MIO values, and iii) edema values on 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 10th days after the mandibular impacted third molar surgery
In the present study, the main hypothesis hypothesizes that the local application of melatonin in the post-extraction socket produces favorable differences in the immediate postoperative period, as anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and early osteogenic regarding the natural healing process of the socket.
Surgical removal of impacted third molars is one of the most frequent procedures carried out in the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics. There are a varying range of postoperative complications including pain, edema and swelling. Antibiotics, analgesics and mouthwashes are usually prescribed for the treatment of these complications. Patients undergoing impacted third molar surgery are frequently prescribed chlorhexidine mouthwashes with/without benzydamine hydrochloride. However, to preclude the adverse effects of these chemical agents, there has been a search for plant-derived alternatives with anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and analgesic properties as part of the oral care routine following surgical removal of impacted third molars. However, there is no study investigating the comparison of different essential oils in the literature. Thus, this multicenter study was aimed to evaluate the effects of St. John's wort oil and virgin olive oil on the postoperative complications and compared with chlorhexidine gluconate plus benzydamine hydrochloride mouthwash after the removal of impacted wisdom teeth.This study was aimed to evaluate the effects of St. John's wort oil, virgin olive oil, and chlorhexidine gluconate plus benzydamine hydrochloride on the postoperative complications after the removal of impacted wisdom teeth.
The investigator's purpose was to compare the effects of the surgical drain and kinesiologic tape applications on postoperative morbidity after mandibular third molar surgery.
During mandibular 3rd molar (wisdom tooth) extractions, when a downward force is placed on the patient's jaw, the patient must tense his/her jaw muscles to oppose it. Patients under moderate/deep sedation or general anesthesia cannot tense their muscles to counter this downward force to prevent injury to the jaw including the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Bite blocks hold the patient's mouth open but do not counter this downward force on the mandible. Currently, oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) when surgically removing 3rd molars (wisdom teeth) with moderate/deep sedation or general anesthesia have a dental assistant that stands behind the chair and places their hands on both sides of the jaw to support it and oppose the downward force on the patient's jaw during the extractions. It is hard for the dental assistant to maintain support while anticipating the direction and amount of force placed by the OMS on the patient's jaw during the surgical removal. This may explain the finding that almost a quarter of new onset TMD cases in young adults is associated with 3rd molar removal. This study will look at the use of a jaw support device to provide a stable counterforce to downward forces on the jaw, thus preventing jaw hyperextension and injury to the jaw.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of different concentrations of povidone iodine (PVP-I) on postoperative swelling and trismus when used as a coolant and irrigation solution during the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
This research study will evaluate inter-individual variability in the analgesic response to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ibuprofen after third molar extraction surgery. It will also investigate demographic, clinical, genetic, and environmental factors that cause this variability.