Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES), which involves obtaining specimens from the abdominal cavity without any incisions, has attracted much attention in recent years, and it has been widely popularized in the treatment of rectal cancer because of its postoperative non-incision, advantages of less trauma, quicker recovery, and postoperative aesthetics. Anastomotic fistula is a serious complication of rectal cancer surgery. For patients at high risk of anastomotic fistula, prophylactic ileostomy is often performed intraoperatively to divert feces and protect the anastomosis. For such patients, rectal anterior resection surgery with specimen extraction via stoma (NOSES with specimen extraction via stoma) is usually performed, borrowing a prophylactic stoma incision to retrieve the specimen, and also realizing the absence of additional abdominal incision. However, this procedure is prone to stoma infection and has a high complication rate (20-40%), which limits the popularization of NOSES surgery and is an urgent clinical problem. Our center has proposed a new stoma closure method (Dumpling Suture Method), which reduces the size of the incision by folding the suture to achieve the effect of hiding the skin incision and reduce stoma infection. In our previous study, 17 cases of the new procedure were completed in our center, and 25 patients with stoma closure by the traditional method were included in the same period for control purposes. After six months of follow-up, we found that the "dumpling suture method" significantly reduced the incidence of stoma complications compared with the traditional suture method (5.8% vs. 36%), and no additional adverse effects were observed. This is a single-center, open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical study planned to recruit 66 patients randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the trial and control groups. The primary endpoint is stoma complication rate at 30 days postoperatively. In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the "dumpling suture method " compared with the traditional stoma suture in reducing postoperative stoma complications through a randomized parallel controlled clinical trial, which is of great significance for the improvement of the rectal NOSES procedure and the reduction of the incidence of stoma complications.


Clinical Trial Description

n/a


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT05985499
Study type Interventional
Source Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Contact Min Shi
Phone +86-21-25076143
Email xinhuahospitalec@163.com
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
Start date March 21, 2023
Completion date December 31, 2024

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05243771 - Norwegian Stoma Trial
Recruiting NCT04675606 - Implementing a Low Fiber Diet vs. Regular Diet in Postoperative Colorectal Patients With Ileostomies N/A
Recruiting NCT03424447 - Stimulation of the Efferent Loop Before Loop Ileostomy Closure Phase 2
Terminated NCT03424954 - The Effect of a 30-day Automated Text Messaging Intervention on Hospital Based Acute Care Encounters Following Ileostomy N/A
Recruiting NCT03982875 - Efficacy and Application of the Alfred SmartBag System After Ileostomy Creation in Colorectal Surgery: A Pilot Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05905393 - The Protective Role of GABA Stimulation Before Ileostomy Closure Phase 3
Completed NCT01881594 - Stimulation of Efferent Loop Prior to Ileostomy Closure Phase 3
Completed NCT04169425 - Laparoscopic Surgery of Rectal Cancer and Ileostomy
Withdrawn NCT04669964 - Evaluating Ileostomy Hydration Protocol
Recruiting NCT05284864 - Timing Evaluation of Stoma Closure (TIMES). Early vs Late Closure of Stoma After Rectal Cancer Surgery. N/A
Recruiting NCT05048329 - The Cascade Feasibility Pilot (Ileostomy) N/A
Completed NCT06010043 - "Dumpling Suture Method" Versus Traditional Suture Method of Protective Loop Ileostomy in Laparoscopic Anterior Rectal Resection With Specimen Extraction Via Stoma: a Retrospective Comparative Study N/A