Clinical Trials Logo

Hysteroscopy Technique clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hysteroscopy Technique.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06394752 Recruiting - Fertility Issues Clinical Trials

UTERINE EVALUATION FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF PATHOLOGY. This Study Will Compare the Intrauterine Pathology Detection Rate Between Standard of Care Hydrosonography, and a New Visual Saline Infusion Device Providing Direct Visualization of the Uterus.

Start date: April 25, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a prospective, single center, multiple arm cohort study intended to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a Visual Saline Infusion Device (VSI) device, vs standard of care Hydrosonography in reproductive aged women to identify pathology in the uterus.

NCT ID: NCT01972945 Completed - Clinical trials for Hysteroscopy Technique

Vaginoscopy Against Standard Treatment (VAST): a Randomised Controlled Trial

VAST
Start date: March 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Inserting a telescope into the womb to identify and treat problems with bleeding, pain or reproduction is the commonest surgical intervention in gynaecology. This procedure is known as a 'hysteroscopy'. The established 'traditional' technique for introducing the hysteroscope into the womb involves the use of a 'speculum', which is inserted into the vagina. A speculum is the metal or plastic instrument used to stretch and separate the vaginal walls so that the opening to the womb, known as the 'cervix' can be seen. The cervix is then cleaned and frequently grasped with a sharp toothed forcep to provide traction before the hysteroscope is inserted. Whilst hysteroscopy is safe, it is known that pain during the procedure can lead to a poor patient experience, and even trigger fainting episodes or failure to complete the procedure. As the hysteroscopes have become smaller, it has been recognised that it is possible to access the cervix and womb (i.e. 'uterus') directly using the hysteroscopic vision without inserting any of these potentially pain inducing vaginal instruments. There is however, uncertainty whether this newer technique known as 'vaginoscopy' or the 'no touch technique' will minimise the pain experienced by the patient or reduce the propensity to fainting. Futhermore, even if vaginoscopy is shown to be less painful, the technique may be more prone to failure due to an inability to transverse the cervix and enter the uterus without additional instruments. Post-operative infection rates of the uterus may also be higher due to vaginal contamination. Reducing pain and complications and improving success of the procedure as well as optimising patients experience is important because hysteroscopy is an intimate examination, known to be associated with significant anxiety and pain. Furthermore, the procedure is widely practised representing the most common surgical intervention in day-to-day gynaecological practice in the UK and elsewhere. It is therefore important, and timely given that outpatient hysteroscopy is increasing especially in community settings, that a large, high quality randomised controlled trial comparing 'vaginoscopy' and the 'traditional' hysteroscopy is undertaken to resolve the uncertainty as to whether vaginoscopy is less painful, safe and more successful than existing approaches to hysteroscopy.