View clinical trials related to Hypersensitivity.
Filter by:Composite is one of the common aesthetic restorations used in the dentistry. With the advancements in the biomaterials the application of the composites has broadened. However due to various factors the composites are associated with dental sensitivity. Hence in our study we evaluate and compare the effectiveness of three desensitizing agents in reducing the post-treatment sensitivity for class I composite restoration.
The study will identify pediatric patients 3-18 years old who have penicillin allergy label in the electronic medical record. Those who are identified will be stratified into no-risk, low-risk and high-risk category using a screening questionnaire. The following definitions will be followed: No-risk: Patients who are historically labeled with penicillin allergy in the EMR based on family history alone OR those who have tolerated penicillin after a concerning incident without any reaction OR with penicillin allergy label but deny any history of reaction to any form of penicillin on screening questionnaire Low-risk: Patients with previous reaction not suggestive of anaphylaxis (defined below) AND not requiring hospitalization for the reaction OR reaction considered non- immunologic (e.g. diarrhea, nausea, yeast vaginitis) OR exposure to penicillin- containing antibiotic after the date of reported reaction with no anaphylaxis and hospitalization AND no serious types of delayed reactions such as Steven- Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), drug-induced hepatitis or other documented organ injury, drug rash eosinophilia systemic symptoms (DRESS), hemolytic anemia, drug-induced cytopenia, and serum sickness. Patients who had delayed reaction (onset more than 24 hours) of isolated, non-progressive symptoms (such as rash/hives alone) also belong to this group. High-risk: Patients with penicillin allergy label on EMR with previous reaction suggestive of anaphylaxis (defined below) OR requiring hospitalization/epinephrine administration for the reaction OR reactions considered immunologic (angioedema, joint pains) OR involving serious types of reactions such as Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), drug-induced hepatitis or other documented organ injury, drug rash eosinophilia systemic symptoms (DRESS), hemolytic anemia, drug-induced cytopenia, and serum sickness. Patients who were previously diagnosed with penicillin allergy by an allergist also belong to the high-risk group. Patients in the no-risk group will be immediately delabeled. Patients in the high-risk group will be referred to allergy/immunology for further work up. The focus of this study is to identify the patients who belong to the low-risk group. This group of patients will be subjected to graded oral amoxicillin challenge testing. Those who will have reactions compatible with allergy will have their allergy status retained in the electronic medical record. Those that will not have reactions or those that will have reactions that are not compatible with allergy will be delabeled in the electronic medical record.
While reported adverse reactions to penicillins are common, most patients with a penicillin allergy label can safely tolerate penicillins, and elective evaluation for penicillin allergy has been recommended. For low-risk patients, direct oral challenge may be an optimal approach as a delabeling strategy. However, there is a vast disparity between the number of patients with a penicillin allergy label and practicing allergists in the United States, and implementing outpatient primary care-based delabeling strategies in low-risk patients may increase access to delabeling assessments. However, a recent survey of pediatricians identified perceived barriers to implementing penicillin allergy evaluations into their routine care. Significant gaps in knowledge exist regarding the feasibility of this approach involving risk stratification evaluation of reported penicillin adverse reactions and direct amoxicillin challenge procedures in low-risk patients in the pediatric primary care setting. With this, the primary aim of this study is to evaluate the number of patients for which risk-stratification and direct amoxicillin challenge are successfully completed in an outpatient pediatric primary care clinic.
There are limited approaches to specifically address auditory sensory over- and under-responsivity (SOR) in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Exposure therapy (or systematic desensitization) may be a treatment option; researchers are investigating this approach. Many children receive sensory integration therapy, but this approach does not specifically target auditory SOR. Some families are advised to have their children avoid noxious stimuli or use compensatory techniques such as wearing headphones or ear plugs. While preliminary research suggests that use of noise attenuating headphones may reduce sympathetic activation for children with ASD and auditory SOR, this approach does not seek to change or alter the underlying cause of sympathetic activation (Pfeiffer et al., 2019). Sound-based interventions are promising options to treat hyperacusis and subsequent auditory SOR in children with ASD. The objective of this study is to investigate changes in adaptive life skills and behavioral responses in children with ASD using Advanced Brain Technology's The Listening Program ® Spectrum music utilizing Waves ™ (bone conduction) headphones. Our study will investigate the effects of a sound-based intervention developed in 2012 to specifically address the needs of children with ASD and children with hyperacusis and/or auditory SOR - The Listening Program® Spectrum music utilizing Waves™ (bone conduction) headphones by Advanced Brain Technologies. This program emphasizes low frequency music over an extended period of time; the duration recommended by Advanced Brain Technologies is 40 weeks.
An open-label, two-part Phase I/Ib study of RP12146 in adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. The first part (Part 1) is a Phase I dose-escalation, 3+3 design, open-label, MTD determination study and will enroll patients who have tumors known to harbour DNA repair deficiencies. The second part (Part 2) is a Phase Ib, dose-expansion at the MTD (or optimal dose) and will enroll patients with a confirmed deleterious HRR mutation in their tumor as identified by a central genomics testing laboratory.
This is an open-label, multicenter, dose escalation and expansion Phase 1 study of SHR7280 in adult patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer.
In this research project, the effect of different polyphenol-containing beverages with varying alcohol content of < 0.4 vol% on immune function as well as muscular growth factors will be investigated
Background: Some people have allergic reactions to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Researchers want to learn more about these reactions to provide guidance on who can safely receive the vaccines, including a second dose in people who had a reaction to the first. Objective: To study the safety of giving a second mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose to people who had a systemic allergic reaction to their first dose. Eligibility: People aged 16-69 who had a systemic allergic reaction to their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Design: Individuals who have underlying health issues may need to come to the NIH for screening tests to make sure they are safe to receive the vaccine. People who are eligible to participate in the study will be admitted to the NIH hospital and stay for at least 4 days. They will give urine samples. They will have a nasal swab SARS-CoV-2 test. They will have an intravenous line placed in each arm. They will get the study vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine) and one dose of placebo on different days. They will have breathing tests. They may have clinical photography if they develop a rash. Participants will have 4 follow-up visits - 2 by phone and 2 in-person visits at the NIH campus . They will have allergy skin testing at one visit. Drops of different allergens or controls will be placed on their back or arm. The skin under each drop will be scratched with a tool. If the results are negative, a small amount of allergen will be injected just below the surface of their skin. Participants who have no or only a mild allergic reaction to the second dose of the vaccine may be eligible to receive a Booster dose at the NIH. Participation will last for approximately 5 months.
This prospective study included patients with primary angle-closure (PAC or primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) and visually significant cataract. Phacoemulsification with multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL) or monofocal IOL (mIOL) (patient preference) was performed. Collected data included best-corrected distant visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and contrast sensitivity (CS) measured at spatial frequency 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18.0 cycles per degree (CPD) preoperatively, and at 2-6 months postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were compared to evaluate the effect of MIOL on CS in eyes with PAC or PACG.
This study aims to investigate the incidence of venous thromboembolism in people who are diagnosed with atopic dermatitis.