View clinical trials related to Hyperglycemia.
Filter by:This study investigated any potential associations between two isocaloric diets with different meal frequency (3 meals versus 6 meals) and glycemic control in people at high diabetes risk (lean and overweight/obese women with PCOS, individuals with hyperinsulinemia, individuals with impaired glucose tolerance) and diagnosed with diabetes.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PreCrea® on subjects with higher than normal blood sugar levels.
- About two-thirds of adults in the United States are overweight or obese which can cause adverse health consequences for those individuals. Post-prandial hyperglycemia is one of these possible consequences and is associated with a higher risk for Type 2 Diabetes. Controlling hyperglycemia is important in the prevention of the onset of diabetes and obesity. Resistant starch is a dietary carbohydrate which is not completely digested in the gut and produces energy for the body to use. The investigators are interested in assessing the effects of resistant starch on postprandial blood glucose and insulin concentrations. - Aim: To assess the effects of a resistant starch on post-prandial blood glucose and insulin concentrations. - Hypothesis: A baked snack bar with a resistant starch will blunt and sustain the post-prandial rise in blood glucose and insulin concentrations compared to a baked snack bar with maltodextrin (an easily digested carbohydrate).
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in glucose control, fitness, and body composition between a standard aerobic and resistance exercise training program and a shorter-duration, high-intensity CrossFit training program in overweight and obese physically inactive adults. Hypotheses: 1. Both groups would improve glucose control, with the CrossFit group improving significantly more than the aerobic and resistance training group. 2. Both groups would improve fitness, with the CrossFit group improving significantly more than the aerobic and resistance training group. 3. Both groups would demonstrate decreases in body fat percentage and fat mass and increases in lean body mass, with the CrossFit group improving significantly more than the aerobic and resistance training group.
Stress hyperglycaemia is commonly observed during hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) and has been shown to adversely influence outcome. It has been hypothesized that, when it occurs in previously non-diabetic patients, it reflects a latent disturbance of the glucose metabolism. Assessing the incidence of this phenomenon and identifying its risk factors could support prevention, detection and early treatment of impending diabetes mellitus type 2. We will perform a glucose tolerance test approximately 6-9 months post-ICU admission to screen for disorders of glucose metabolism. Furthermore, we examined characteristics that could have predicted the post-discharge disturbances: patient characteristics, parameters of disease severity and of glucose metabolism, as well as the FINDRISC (Finnish Diabetes Risc Score). We plan to enroll 400 patients.
Diabetes mellitus type 2 is a long-term metabolic disorder that is primarily characterized by insulin resistance, relative insulin deficiency and hyperglycemia. Our hypotheses is that liver would be the primary organ responsible for the metabolic disorder because of some unknown defects, where sugar would not be efficiently converted to glycogen and fat, leading to hyperglycemia. The constant hyperglycemia would keep pressure on beta-cells in the pancreas to eventually exhaust their ability to produce and secret sufficient amount of insulin, exacerbating the disease. The Immunotherapy would enhance the liver functions and correct the abnormal sugar metabolism. In addition, the ex vivo activated cells produce and secret growth factors which would help endothelial cells of blood vessels to reproduce and grow, resulting in reduced arteriosclerosis.
Insulin preparation -random assignment to regular insulin lin or lispro insulin as first treatment- was administered at constant infusion rate (0.04 units/Kg/h) in patients presenting blood glucose concentration ≥180 mg/dl and was discontinued when blood glucose concentration ≤140 mg/dl (therapeutic blood glucose concentration drop). Further reduction in blood glucose concentration after discontinuation of insulin infusion was recorded (post-infusional blood glucose concentration drop). During the study period blood glucose concentration, in whole blood, was measured every 30 minutes. At least 6 hours interval was allowed between the 2 treatments.
Hypothesis: A beverage with a resistant starch will blunt and sustain the post-prandial rise in blood glucose and insulin concentrations compared to beverage with maltodextrin (an easily digested carbohydrate).
An increase in blood glucose is a common clinical symptom in patients following traumatic brain injury. Studies confirm that death after traumatic brain injury was not only associated with nerve injury, but also correlated with abnormal physiological and metabolic reactions. Hyperglycemia is a manifestation of physiological and metabolic disorders after traumatic brain injury. Traumatic brain injury induced hyperglycemia, and then aggravated secondary injury to the brain. Therefore, it is of important clinical significance to study the treatment of hyperglycemia after traumatic brain injury.
Objective: to determine which regimen results in best glycemic control and safety profile, expressed as glucose values within target range and occurrence of hypoglycemia. Secondary objective is to compare patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes and toxicity. Study design: Randomized open label cross-over study Study population: Patients ≥ 18 years, who developed glucocorticoid induced hyperglycemia requiring initiation or adjustment of antihyperglycemic agents in a previous chemotherapy cycle. Patient should have ≥2 cycles of chemotherapy scheduled, with 3-10 consecutive days of ≥12,5mg prednisone-equivalent glucocorticoid and a wash-out period of 4-38 days between each cycle. Intervention: subjects will be treated by insulin regimen A and B in random order during two consecutive cycles of chemotherapy. A) intermediate acting insulin 0.01 IU / mg prednisone-equivalent / kg body weight once daily subcutaneous B) Short-acting insulin according to sliding scale regimen, dose adjusted to current grade of hyperglycemia. Main study parameters: Difference in fraction of blood glucose measurements (BGM) within target range and occurrence of hypoglycemia. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Both study treatments are just a slight variation in regular care for glucocorticoid induced hyperglycemia. Glycemic control is likely to improve due to treatments and increased counselling. All subjects will receive both treatment regimens. The burden consists of 16-32 extra BGMs over 2 x 4-10 days, wearing the glucose sensor, 1 venipuncture (if HbA1c and creatinin are not determined in routine laboratory within 3 months before start), and 1 randomization visit to the outpatient clinic. Potential risk is the occurrence of hypoglycemia, as is present in any insulin therapy. The investigators account for this risk by giving subjects dietary advice and education how to prevent, recognize and treat hypoglycemia.