View clinical trials related to Humeral Fractures.
Filter by:20 patients with distal humeral fractures (AO 13-A1 - AO 13-C3) were included in the current study since 2014. After completing the randomization plan, patients were distributed into two groups for different variable angle locking plates (DePuy Synthes VA-LCP vs. Medartis Aptus Elbow). Clinical and radiological follow-ups were conducted 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after the operation.
The aim of this study is to determine if antibiotics affect the outcome after percutaneous surgery for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures. The patient population will be recruited from the cohort presenting to Women and Children's Hospital for percutaneous fixation of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures who meet the eligibility criteria and consent to taking part in the study. Patients will be followed up for 3-6 weeks depending on age, and will be evaluated on the presence or absence superficial or deep infection, Visual Analog Scale pain scores, time to healing, need for repeat casting, and loss of fixation.
Optimal treatment of proximal humeral fractures is yet to be defined. Many of them can be treated non-operatively. The question remains on how long do we have to immobilize non-operatively treated proximal humeral fractures?
In this study, patients with upper arm fracture will receive an additive robotic-assisted training using the Armeo®Spring robot for three weeks on the injured arm in addition to conventional physio- and occupational therapy. The supportive treatment and execution of specific exercises on the Armeo®Spring should lead to improved recovery of function and mobility of the upper arm compared to conservatively treated patients.
From April ,2014 to April 2015,31 patients with fractures of the proximal humerus were treated in our hospital. According to anatomic neck fractures (ANF) and surgical neck fractures (SNF), we divided the patients into two groups. All the patients were followed at least 1 year.
To date, the clinical benefits and harms of surgical intervention in proximal humerus fractures in children remain debatable. The practical question raised by orthopaedic surgeons is: for children and adolescent, are the clinical and radiological outcomes after non-operative management as equivalent as after surgical management for proximal humerus fractures? The investigators' hypothesis is that due to the healing potential of the proximal humerus, the outcome from this fracture is usually excellent. The investigators have applied for Caldicott approval to identify a cohort of eligible patient from NHS Tayside's radiography service. With the community health index (CHI) number, the investigators can review all shoulder X-rays performed in children and adolescents, aged from 10 to 18-year-old in NHS Tayside, from 2008 to 2015. The Caldicott approval also allowed the investigators to obtain clinical communication from the Clinical Portal (electronic summary healthcare records). The investigators will then conduct mail questionnaires, based on the Upper Extremities Functional Index (UEFI). The investigators will send out invitation letter with participation information and the UEFI questionnaires to the eligible patients; with return postages. If no response within 2 weeks, the investigators will send out 1 further reminder. If no further response, the patient will be excluded from the study.
In the present phase-II clinical trial the researchers investigate efficacy and proof of concept of the augmentation with preoperatively isolated autologous BMC cells seeded onto ß-TCP in combination with an angle stable fixation (Philos plate®) for the therapy of proximal humeral fractures.
This study protocol represents an attempt to objectively choose appropriate methods for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in older patients by comparing locking compression plate with conventional steel plate fixation to improve shoulder function.
Lateral humeral condyle fractures are the second most common elbow fractures in children. Displaced and rotated fractures require stabilization and reduction. Kirschner wires (K-wires) are most commonly used for fracture fixation. Here, the investigators introduce a new fixation method involving absorbable screws. The investigators aimed to determine if it is feasible to treat lateral humeral condyle fractures with absorbable screws by comparing the functional outcomes obtained using screw fixation vs. K-wire fixation.
Fractures of the supracondylar region of the humerus are among the most common pediatric injuries requiring the attention of an orthopaedic surgeon. Children with non-displaced fractures (Type I), as well as those with history of elbow trauma, have been traditionally managed with non-surgical immobilization. Recently published clinical guidelines support such practice, based on the result of two prospective studies in which either collar and cuff or posterior splint immobilization were used. When compared to collar and cuff immobilization, posterior splints resulted in better pain relief within the first two weeks of injury; however, critical outcomes, including the incidence of cubitus varus, hyperextension, and loss of reduction, were not reported. While posterior splints appear to be an attractive option for the treatment of non-displaced pediatric elbow fractures, a recent retrospective analysis on the use of posterior splints for the treatment of such injuries reported a small proportion of fractures demonstrating displacement. The potential for non-compliance with the use of removable devices, especially in the older pediatric population, is also a concern. The use of a removable immobilization that can reliably maintain fracture alignment, minimize the risk of non-compliance, and result in similar outcomes as those obtained with regular casting could be advantageous: It appears that such immobilization could be removed easily and safely at home, potentially resulting in a lower number of patient visits, decreased health-care costs, and higher patient/parent satisfaction. Telemedicine, defined as the use of telecommunication and information technologies in order to provide clinical health care at a distance, has been seldom used in the field of pediatric orthopaedics. Commonly mentioned attributes of telemedicine include improved access to healthcare providers, cost containment and increased healthcare efficiency, quality care improvements related to patient satisfaction, and potential reduction in travel time for patients and families. The purpose of this randomized, controlled, prospective study is to assess telemedicine as a tool for the treatment follow-up of non-displaced SCHF fractures in children. Investigators hypothesize that using telemedicine will result in comparable clinical outcomes as those obtained in patients treated in a clinical facility, with increased patient satisfaction and decreased healthcare costs.