View clinical trials related to Humeral Fractures.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trial is to study whether surgery results in better functional outcomes than non-surgical treatment among patients aged 50-65 with a displaced proximal humerus fracture. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Does osteosynthesis result in better patient-reported functional outcomes compared to non-surgical treatment at 12 months follow-up? Aim is also to characterize the patient group aged 50-65 regarding fracture morphology, osteoporosis, and clinical frailty scale. The study compare operation with either plate or nail fixation to non-surgical treatment. Participants will: - Receive either surgical treatment or non-surgical treatment. - At 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, the patient will answer two short questionnaires (Oxford Shoulder Score and Eq-5D-3L). The primary outcome will be Oxford Shoulder Score at 12 months. The secondary outcome will be OSS at 6 and 24 months and EQ-5D-3L score measured at the same time-points. Adverse events and conversion to surgery will be registered. OSS and EQ-5D-3L will be completed just before the 6 months visit.
Prospective patient registry examining the outcome of three different treatment methods for proximal humerus fractures in elderlies: conservative treatment, open and minimal invasive surgical treatment.
Pseudarthrosis of the humerus is a serious complication of humerus fractures, of particular interest to subjects young working people with pseudoarthrogenic risk factors (tobacco++). It represents a real problem therapeutic given the long period of treatment, its disabling socio-professional repercussions and the cost which resulting. The aim of our work is to evaluate the anatomical and functional results of different surgical techniques. used.
The aim of this multicenter nonrandomised study is to prospectively compare the clinical and radiographic results of two different techniques of surgical fixation of proximal humeral fractures: percutaneous pinning versus plate and screws.
A Comparative study Between Ultrasound guided Interscalene Block and Combined Ultrasound guided suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks for proximal humerus fracture Surgeries. The aim of this study is to investigate whether (Suprascapular nerve block) and (Axillary nerve block) are effective in providing analgesia for shoulder surgery as an (Interscalene block), while minimizing the occurrence of hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis. We hypothesized that analgesia with a (Suprascapular nerve block and Axillary nerve block) would be noninferior compared with patients receiving an interscalene block and the incidence of hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis would be significantly lower with (Suprascapular nerve block and Axillary nerve block) in proximal humerus fracture surgeries.
the aim of the study is comparing the effects of LLLT and PEMFT on range of motion of elbow and radioulnar joint ,pain ,muscles strength of upper limb and hand function in children with post-operative type II and III supracondylar humeral fracture.
This purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of nonopioid versus opioid analgesic regimens following surgical fixation of Gartland Type III Supracondylar Humoral Fractures (SCHFs) to assist in the development of a standard outpatient pain management regimen in the treatment of these injuries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate compare postoperative range of motion in patients who are given a sling for comfort only and allowed to start early active range of motion compared to patients who are placed in a sling for 4 weeks with passive range of motion only. Once enrolled, the patients will be randomized through computer randomization then placed in paper packets into either the immobilization group or the early range of motion group.
This double-blind, randomized controlled clinical study aims to evaluate the effects of PBM on the functional recovery of participants with surgically treated PHF using special locking plates. The 42 participants will be randomized (1:1) into two groups: the Control group (standard physical therapy combined with simulated PBM) and the PBM group (standard physical therapy combined with active PBM). Participants will apply PBM at home daily for 10 minutes using a device containing 318 light-emitting diodes (LEDs), with 159 LEDs at 660 nm (28.5 mW; 12 J/cm2; 17 J per LED) and 159 LEDs at 850 nm (23 mW; 10 J/cm2; 14 J per LED). PBM and physical therapy sessions (30 minutes, twice a week) will be conducted over 12 weeks. Participants will be unaware of their group allocation and will be assessed at 24 hours, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery by four examiners who are also blinded to each participant's allocation. The primary outcome, assessed at all time points, will be shoulder function recovery using the Quick-DASH functional scale. Secondary outcomes will include shoulder range of motion assessments with a digital goniometer, quality of life using the SF-6 questionnaire, and the occurrence of adverse effects at all time points. Spontaneous pain, pressure pain (measured with a dolorimeter), nighttime pain, and analgesic use will be evaluated at 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Fracture consolidation will be assessed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks through radiographic examinations, and muscle strength will be evaluated by progressive dumbbell support at 8 and 12 weeks. In addition to the scheduled assessments, participants will be contacted daily by phone.
Analgesic drug study that will compare pain outcomes of opioid analgesia and opioid-free analgesia in post-operative orthopedic patients.