Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06015581 |
Other study ID # |
STUDY00003373 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 2024 |
Est. completion date |
May 2026 |
Study information
Verified date |
August 2023 |
Source |
Florida State University |
Contact |
Sylvie Naar, PhD |
Phone |
18506442334 |
Email |
sylvie.naar[@]med.fsu.edu |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
In this study, investigators will test the YACHT package in 42 FDOH contracted Counseling,
Testing and Referral (CTR) agencies across Florida's seven End the HIV Epidemic (EHE)
counties. The study is powered on both effectiveness outcomes (number of HIV tests of Young
Sexual Minority Men - YSMM) and implementation outcomes, consistent with a type 2 hybrid
trial. It is hypothesized that YACHT will improve providers' fidelity to Tailored
Motivational Interviewing (TMI) when delivering risk reduction counseling (RRC) and PrEP
referrals (implementation outcomes) and will increase testing among YSMM (effectiveness
outcome). Investigators will use an innovative stepped wedge design to test the YACHT
package, including a second randomization to explore ongoing quality management (QM) with
mystery shoppers (MS) as a sustainment strategy. The study also contains a qualitative
component based on the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework
to further understand the context of implementation and sustainment (sequential explanatory
mixed methods).
Description:
Primary Aim: To test the effect of YACHT to improve fidelity to DIAGNOSE and PREVENT EBPs in
42 FDOH contracted CTR agencies in the seven Florida EHE counties. The primary effectiveness
outcome is the number of HIV tests among YSMM. The primary implementation outcome is
developmentally and culturally responsive delivery of competent EBPs (RRC, PrEP referral,
TMI) based on MS assessments.
Secondary Aim 1: To assess the effect of continued QM (ongoing MS feedback) in sustaining the
primary outcomes.
Secondary Aim 2: To utilize mixed methods based on the EPIS framework to understand barriers
and facilitators of successful implementation and sustainment of youth-specific EBPs within
CTR to improve the DIAGNOSE and PREVENT pillars for YSMM.
In the proposed study, investigators will test the YACHT package in 42 FDOH contracted CTR
agencies across Florida's seven EHE counties. The study is powered on both effectiveness
outcomes (number of HIV tests of YSMM) and implementation outcomes (EBP fidelity), consistent
with a type 2 hybrid trial. The investigative team hypothesizes that YACHT will improve
providers' fidelity to TMI when delivering RRC and PrEP referrals (implementation outcomes)
and will increase testing among YSMM (effectiveness outcome). The study will use an
innovative stepped wedge design to test the YACHT package, including a second randomization
to explore ongoing QM with MS as a sustainment strategy.
Primary effectiveness outcome: The primary outcome is # of tests of YSMM (ages 15-29), as
reported in aggregate at the agency- and county-level. Investigators expect that the YACHT
package will improve the number of HIV tests administered to YSMM at each agency. As an
exploratory outcome, FDOH has recently begun tracking PrEP uptake, defined as ≥1 day of
TDF/FTC prescribed for PrEP. Both the testing and PrEP data are currently reported in a
standardized fashion to FDOH. Data will be aggregated within agencies and will be requested
biannually. Data will be managed into quarterly windows to correspond to the data collection
intervals in the stepped wedge design.
Primary implementation outcomes: Procedures for MS are described in C4a Exploration and
domains are described in Preliminary Studies (section C1c). Using the pre-established MS
domains, investigators will compute an overall agency score using the pooled scores from the
two MS conducted each quarter. Pooled scores will be presented to reduce potential selection
bias and confounding based on whether the same or a different provider interacted with the
shoppers at either agency visit, and to account for the variability across shoppers. Domain
sub-scores will also be created using psychometrically tested subscales for: 1) LGBT
visibility, 2) medical form inclusivity, 3) perceived clinic environment, 4) privacy and
confidentiality, 5) relationship context, 6) RRC, 7) safer sex education, 8) PrEP information
and referral, 9) perceived provider competency, and 10) patient-provider interactions. For
ease of interpretability across domains, investigators will normalize the pooled average
scores into percentiles.