Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
Feasibility of online MBQR as measured by recruitment rates |
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of MBQR. Feasibility will be assessed via three measures. One measure of feasibility will be participant recruitment rates. See other primary outcomes for other measures used. |
3 months |
|
Primary |
Feasibility of online MBQR as measured by retention rates |
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of MBQR. Feasibility will be assessed via three measures. One measure of feasibility will be participant retention rates (i.e., as measured by attendance and attrition). See other primary outcomes for other measures used. |
3 months |
|
Primary |
Feasibility of online MBQR as measured by engagement: Enactment of treatment skills |
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of MBQR. Feasibility will be assessed via three measures. One measure of feasibility will be engagement (i.e, enactment of treatment skills), which will be assessed by home practice completion. |
3 months |
|
Primary |
Acceptability of online MBQR as measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire |
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of MBQR. Acceptability will be assessed using three measures. One such measure of acceptability will be via acceptability ratings using the validated 8-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Scores for the CSQ-8 range from 8 to 32, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction. See other primary outcomes for other measures used. |
3 months |
|
Primary |
Acceptability of online MBQR as measured by a session evaluation form |
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of MBQR. Acceptability will be assessed using three measures. One such measure of acceptability will be via a session evaluation form that provides both qualitative and quantitative feedback on the study intervention. See other primary outcomes for other measures used. |
3 months |
|
Primary |
Acceptability of online MBQR as measured by semi-structured qualitative exit interview |
The primary aim of the study is to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of MBQR. Acceptability will be assessed using three measures. One such measure of acceptability will be via a semi-structured qualitative exit interview conducted with one-on-one with study participants via a videoconferencing platform (i.e., Zoom). Interviews will be transcribed and coded for analysis. |
3 months |
|
Secondary |
Impact of MBQR intervention on depressive symptoms |
Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the 9-item, self-reported Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Participants will report on depressive symptoms using a four item Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Several days, 2=More than half the days, 3=Nearly every day). The PHQ-9 will be completed at baseline, weekly during the intervention, and then once post-intervention. Scores range from 0-27 with cut points indicating minimal (1-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), and severe (20-27) depression. Since the questionnaire relies on patient self-report, all responses should be verified by a clinician. |
3 months |
|
Secondary |
Impact of MBQR intervention on anxiety |
Anxiety will be assessed using the 7-item, self-reported Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7). Participants will report on anxiety symptoms using a four item Likert scale (0=Not at all, 1=Several days, 2=More than half the days, 3=Nearly every day). The GAD-7 will be completed at baseline, weekly during the intervention, and then once post-intervention. Scores range from 0-21, with scores of 5, 10, and 15 serving as cut-off points for mild, moderate and severe anxiety, respectively. When used as a screening tool, further evaluation is recommended when the score is 10 or greater. Since the questionnaire relies on patient self-report, all responses should be verified by a clinician. |
3 months |
|
Secondary |
Impact of MBQR intervention on sexual risk behaviors |
Questions to evaluate sexual risk behaviors were adapted from Emory University's American Men's Internet Survey. The full set of questions assessing sexual risk behaviors will be asked at baseline and again post-intervention. A sub set of the questions will be administered weekly during the intervention. |
3 months |
|
Secondary |
Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) |
The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) is a 15-item self-report measure of attention control and mindfulness. Scores range from 15 to 90 with higher scores reflecting higher levels of dispositional mindfulness. |
3 months |
|
Secondary |
Self-Compassion |
Assessed using the 26-item validated Self-Compassion Scale (SCS); Participants indicate how they typically act towards themselves in difficult times using a 5-point Likert scale with 1 being "Almost Never" to 5 being "Almost Always". The total self-compassion score is calculated by reverse scoring the negative sub-scale items - self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification (i.e., 1 = 5, 2 = 4, 3 = 3, 4 = 2, 5 = 1) then computing a total mean. Researchers can choose to analyze their data either by using individual sub-scale sores or by using a total score. |
3 months |
|
Secondary |
Safe Sex Self-Efficacy |
Safe sex self-efficacy will be assessed using the Safe Sex Self-Efficacy Scale (SSES), which is a 13-item questionnaire that use a Likert-type response scale (1=Not at all confident to 5=extremely confident) to assess the respondent's self-efficacy for carrying out healthy sexual behaviors with a primary partner. Total scores range from 13 to 65 with higher scores reflecting greater self-efficacy. |
3 months |
|
Secondary |
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale Short Form (DERS) |
The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Short Form Scale is an 18-item self-report measure of six facets of emotion regulation. Items are rated on a scale of 1-5, with 1 being ("almost never [0-10%]"); 2 ("sometimes [11-35%]"); 3 ("about half the time [36-65%]"); 4 ("most of the time [66-90%]); and 5 being ("almost always [91-100%]"). Higher scores indicate more difficulty in emotion regulation. |
3 months |
|
Secondary |
Internalized Stigma/Homophobia |
Internalized Stigma/Homophobia will be assessed using the self-report 9-item Internalized Homophobia Scale (IHS) that measures perceived and experienced stigma in the past 12 months using a four point scale (1=Never, 2=Rarely, 3=Sometimes, 4=Often). Scores range from 9 to 36 with higher scores indicating higher internalized stigma. |
3 months |
|