Short Term Intensified Chemo-immunotherapy in HIV-positive Patients With Burkitt Lymphoma

HIV Clinical Trial

— CARMEN  

Official title:

Phase II Study on Safety and Activity of a Short Term Intensified Chemo-immunotherapy Combination in HIV-positive Patients Affected by Burkitt Lymphoma

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01516593
• Other study ID #: CARMEN
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 2
• Start date: November 2011
• Est. completion date: August 2015

Study information

• Verified date: August 2022
• Source: IRCCS San Raffaele
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a multicenter,open-label trial to evaluate activity and safety of the investigational intensive in HIV+ patients with Burkitt's lymphoma.

Experimental treatment consists of an induction phase followed by a consolidation or intensified phase according to tumor response.

Until recently, the immuno-compromised state of patients with concomitant HIV/AIDS and BL was thought to limit the ability to administer intensive chemotherapeutic regimens due to infection rate. However, the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and evidence in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas that HIV-positive patients can tolerate standard chemotherapeutic regimens with improved outcomes have led investigators to treat HIV-positive patients with the same intensive chemotherapy regimens used to treat immuno-competent patients. Data suggest that these current approaches, along with supportive care, may result in improved patient outcomes, similar to those in the immuno-competent patient population.

Description:

The activity of feasibility of the proposed program will be assessed in HIV+ patients with Burkitt lymphoma with the aim to improve tolerability, minimize source consuming and supporting treatment and redu ce late sequels. Available combinations in this setting are really source demanding and toxic combinations showing high rates of septic complication and a treatment-related mortality of near 20%.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 19
• Est. completion date: August 2015
• Est. primary completion date: April 2013
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Histologic diagnosis of Burkitt's lymphoma (WHO 2008)

• HIV sero-positivity

• Age =18 and =60 years

• ECOG-PS =3

Exclusion Criteria:

• CNS parenchymal involvement

• Absolute neutrophil count <1.000 cells/µL and platelets count <75 × 109/L (Burkitt unrelated)

• Creatinine >1,5N (Burkitt unrelated)

• SGOT and/or SGTP >2,5N (Burkitt unrelated)

• Bilirubin >2N (Burkitt unrelated)

• Severe psychiatric illness or any other clinical, social or psychological condition that could interfere with patient's adherence and compliance

• Significant cardiac disease or acute myocardial infarction in the last 12 months

• Severe active infection (except for HBV and/or HCV co-infection)

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Burkitt Lymphoma
• Burkitt's Lymphoma
• HIV
• HIV Seropositivity
• Lymphoma

Intervention

Drug:
• Induction Phase
dd -2 to 1: Methylprednisolone dd 0-1, Cyclophosphamide, associated on day 0 with Vincristine dd 2, Rituximab dd 7, Methotrexate dd 14, Rituximab dd 15, Etoposide dd 21, Methotrexate dd 29, Rituximab and Doxorubicin dd 36, Rituximab and VCR At the end of this induction phase, subsequent treatment will be performed according to the objective response: pts in CR: consolidation phase followed by bulky site irradiation pts in PR: consolidation phase followed by BEAM conditioning regimen supported by ASCT and bulky irradiation pts with SD after induction or PD during or after induction: intensification phase followed by BEAM conditioning regimen supported by ASCT and bulky irradiation
• Consolidation Phase (on day +50)
dd 1-2: cytarabine twice a day dd 3 and 11: rituximab dd 11-13: leukapheresis for PBPC collection.
• Intensification phase
One or two courses of R-IVAC or R-ICE chemoimmunotherapy regimen, every three weeks as debulking. CTX (dd 1) associated with rituximab on dd 3 and 10, followed by PBPC collection (dd 11-13); AraC every 12 hours for four days (dd -5 to -2) supported by reinfusion of CD34+ cells (dd 0), rituximab infusion (dd -1 and +11) and second in-vivo purged PBPC collection (if needed).
• BEAM conditioning
BCNU on dd 1; VP-16 every 12 hours on dd 2-5 and araC every 12 hours on dd 2-5; melphalan on dd 6, followed by the reinfusion of CD34+ cells

Radiation:
• Consolidation radiotherapy
At the end of the whole program, patients will be evaluated for involved-field irradiation with 6-10 MeV photons and a dose of 36 Gy (2 Gy/d, five fractions a week). Three subgroups of patients will be considered for radiotherapy

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Italy	Oncologia Medica A - Centro di Riferimento Oncologico	Aviano (PN)
Italy	Ematologia - A.O. Spedali Civili	Brescia
Italy	Dip. Oncoematologia - Fondazione Centro San Raffaele del Monte Tabor	Milano
Italy	S.C. Oncologia Medica - Ospedale San Paolo	Milano
Italy	S.C. Oncologia Medica 3 - IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT)	Milano
Italy	U.O.C. Immunodeficienze virali - I.N.M.I. L. Spallanzani	Roma
Italy	S.C. Oncoematologia - A.O. Santa Maria	Terni
Italy	U.O. Ematologia 2 - Ospedale San Giovanni Battista	Torino

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Andres J. M. Ferreri

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Italy, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	evaluation of activity of the induction phase in terms of complete remission rate	Objective lymphoma response achieved after the induction phase of the experimental treatment.	at the end of the induction phase of the investigational intensive chemotherapy, an expected average of 45 days
Secondary	Feasibility and tolerability of the investigational intensive chemotherapy in terms of grade =4 adverse events	Assessment of incidence of grade 4 AE during experimental treatment (induction, consolidation and intensification phases as well as conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation (if indicated)	participants will be followed for the duration of the whole experimental program, an expected average of 100 days
Secondary	Feasibility and tolerability of the consolidation phase followed by BEAM conditioning and autologous stem cell transplantation in terms of prevalence of grade =4 adverse events		participants will be followed for the duration of the whole experimental program, an expected average of 100 days
Secondary	Feasibility and tolerability of intensification phase in terms of prevalence of grade =4 adverse events	Participants who will not achieve a complete or partial response after induction and consolidation phases will be referred to intensification phase, which will be followed by BEAM + ASCT. These patients will be assess for tolerabbility and AE during these therapeutic phases.	participants will be followed for the duration of the whole experimental program, an expected average of 100 days
Secondary	Activity of the whole investigational program in terms of complete remission rate	Participants will be assessed by conventional exams to define complete remission rate after the whole experiemntal program; that is after consolidation phase for patients who achieved complete remission after induction phase, after BEAM + ASCt for patients who achieved partial response after induction phase, and after intensification phase for patients who did not achieve an objective response after induction phase.	at the end of the whole program, an expected average of 100 days