Outcome
| Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
| Primary |
Percentage of Participants Receiving Doravirine/Islatravir (DOR/ISL) With =0.5 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Day 8 in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Compared to Placebo Treatment |
Participants with a =0.5 log10 decrease from Day 1 baseline to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA were identified by the central laboratory with an Abbott Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay which has a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 40 copies/mL Only participants treated with DOR/ISL FDC or placebo were analyzed in this outcome measure. |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Primary |
Percentage of Participants With =1 AEs Through Week 49 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. |
Up to 49 weeks |
|
| Primary |
Percentage of Participants Withdrawing From Study Treatment Due to AE(s) Through Week 25 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. |
Up to 25 weeks |
|
| Primary |
Percentage of Participants With =1 Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 25 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. |
Up to 25 weeks |
|
| Primary |
Percentage of Participants Withdrawing From Study Treatment Due to AE(s) Through Week 49 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. |
Up to 49 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants With =1 Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 97 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. |
Up to 97 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing From Study Therapy Due to AE(s) Through Week 97 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. |
Up to 97 weeks |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants Receiving DOR or ISL (Given With Antiretroviral Therapy [ART]) With =0.5 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Day 8 HIV-1 RNA Compared to Placebo Treatment |
Participants with a =0.5 log10 decrease from Day 1 baseline to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA were identified by the central laboratory with an Abbott Real Time PCR assay which has a LLOD of 40 copies/mL Only participants treated with either DOR or ISL or placebo (given with ART) were analyzed in this outcome measure. Participants treated with DOR/ISL FDC were not analyzed in this outcome measure. |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Secondary |
Mean Change From Baseline Day 1 to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA Following Treatment With DOR/ISL (Given With ART), DOR, or ISL Compared to Placebo Treatment |
The change from baseline Day to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on the t-distribution. |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants Receiving DOR/ISL (Given With ART), DOR, or ISL With =1.0 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Day 8 HIV-1 RNA Compared to Placebo Treatment |
Participants with a =1.0 log10 decrease from baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA were identified by at the central laboratory with an Abbott Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay which has a LLOD of 40 copies/mL |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants Receiving DOR/ISL (Given With ART) With =0.5 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA Compared to DOR or ISL Treatment |
Participants with a =0.5 log10 decrease from baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA were identified by at the central laboratory with an Abbott Real Time PCR assay which has a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 40 copies/mL Only participants treated with DOR/ISL or DOR alone or ISL alone were analyzed in this outcome measure. Participants treated with placebo were not analyzed in this outcome measure. |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Secondary |
Mean Change From Baseline Day 1 to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA Following Treatment With DOR/ISL (Given With ART) Compared to DOR or ISL Treatment |
The change from baseline Day 1 to Day 8in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the t-distribution. The group treated with placebo were not analyzed in this outcome measure. |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants Receiving DOR/ISL (Given With ART) With =1.0 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA Compared to DOR or ISL Treatment |
Participants receiving DOR/ISL with a =1.0 log10 decrease from baseline (Day 1) to Day 8 in HIV-1 RNA were identified by at the central laboratory with an Abbott Real Time PCR assay which has a lower limit of detection (LLOD) of 40 copies/mL Only participants treated with DOR/ISL or DOR alone or ISL alone were analyzed in this outcome measure. Participants treated with placebo were not analyzed in this outcome measure. |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =0.5 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =0.5 log10 change from baseline Day 1 to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =0.5 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =0.5 log10 change from baseline Day 1 to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =0.5 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =0.5 log10 change from baseline Day 1 to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =0.5 log10 Change From Day 8 Baseline to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =0.5 log10 change from baseline Day 8 to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =0.5 log10 Change From Day 8 Baseline to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =0.5 log10 change from baseline Day 8 to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =0.5 log10 Change From Day 8 Baseline to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =0.5 log10 change from baseline Day 8 to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =1.0 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =1.0 log10 change from baseline Day 1 to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =1.0 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =1.0 log10 change from baseline Day 1 to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =1.0 log10 Change From Day 1 Baseline to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =1.0 log10 change from baseline Day 1 to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =1.0 log10 Change From Day 8 Baseline to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =1.0 log10 change from baseline Day 8 to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =1.0 log10 Change From Day 8 Baseline to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =1.0 log10 change from baseline Day 8 to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With =1.0 log10 Change From Day 8 Baseline to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA |
The percentage of participants in the pooled treatment group with =1.0 log10 change from baseline Day 8 to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Mean Change From Baseline Day 1 to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 1 to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Mean Change From Baseline Day 1 to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 1 to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Mean Change From Baseline Day 1 to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 1 to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Mean Change From Baseline Day 8 to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 8 to Week 25 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Mean Change From Baseline Day 8 to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 8 to Week 49 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Mean Change From Baseline Day 8 to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 8 to Week 97 in HIV-1 RNA was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From Day 1 Baseline to Day 8 With HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies mL |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies mL was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From Day 1 Baseline to Day 8 With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies mL |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies mL was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From Day 1 Baseline to Day 8 With HIV-1 RNA <40 Copies mL |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies mL was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. |
Day 1 (baseline) and Day 8 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL at Week 25 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies mL at week 25 was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL at Week 49 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies mL at week 49 was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With HIV-1 RNA <200 Copies/mL at Week 97 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <200 copies mL at week 97 was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 25 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies mL at week 25 was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 49 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies mL at week 49 was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies/mL at Week 97 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies mL at week 97 was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With HIV-1 RNA <40 Copies/mL at Week 25 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies mL at week 25 was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With HIV-1 RNA <40 Copies/mL at Week 49 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies mL at week 49 was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol. |
Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With HIV-1 RNA <40 Copies/mL at Week 97 |
The percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies mL at week 97 was determined by the central laboratory using an Abbott Real Time PCR assay with a LLOD of 40 copies/mL. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With Treatment-emergent Resistance-associated Substitutions to DOR at Week 25 |
The prevalence of viral drug resistance to DOR was based on the percentage of participants with treatment-emergent (TE) resistance-associated substitutions (RASs), which is calculated by dividing the number of participants with TE RASs by the number of participants tested for resistance multiplied by 100. RASs for DOR were as follows: V106A/M, Y188C/L, F227C/H/I/L, M230I/L, L234I, Y318F, V108I, Y188F/H, G190E, H221Y, P236, and were determined by the central laboratory with the GenoSure Prime assay on post randomization samples from participants with HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol. |
Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With Treatment-emergent Resistance-associated Substitutions to DOR at Week 49 |
The prevalence of viral drug resistance to DOR was based on the percentage of participants with TE RASs, which is calculated by dividing the number of participants with TE RASs by the number of participants tested for resistance, multiplied by 100. RASs for DOR were as follows: V106A/M, Y188C/L, F227C/H/I/L, M230I/L, L234I, Y318F, V108I, Y188F/H, G190E, H221Y, P236, and were determined by the central laboratory with the GenoSure Prime assay on post randomization samples from participants with HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol. |
Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With Treatment-emergent Resistance-associated Substitutions to ISL at Week 25 |
The prevalence of viral drug resistance to ISL was based on the percentage of participants with TE RAS, which is calculated by dividing the number of participants with TE RAS by the number of participants tested for resistance, multiplied by 100. The RAS for ISL, M184V was determined by the central laboratory with the GenoSure Prime assay on post randomization samples from participants with HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol. |
Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With Treatment-emergent Resistance-associated Substitutions to ISL at Week 49 |
The prevalence of viral drug resistance to ISL was based on the percentage of participants with TE RAS, which is calculated by dividing the number of participants with TE RAS by the number of participants tested for resistance, multiplied by 100. The RAS for ISL, M184V was determined by the central laboratory with the GenoSure Prime assay on post randomization samples from participants with HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol. |
Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With Treatment-emergent Resistance-associated Substitutions to Optimized Background Therapy (OBT) Components at Week 25 |
The prevalence of viral drug resistance to OBT components was based on the percentage of participants with TE RASs, which is calculated by dividing the number of participants with TE RASs by the number of participants tested for resistance, multiplied by 100. The RASs for OBT components were determined by the central laboratory with the GenoSure Prime assay on post randomization samples from participants with HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol. |
Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Percentage of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With Treatment-emergent Resistance-associated Substitutions to OBT Components at Week 49 |
The prevalence of viral drug resistance to OBT components was based on the percentage of participants with TE RASs, which is calculated by dividing the number of participants with TE RASs by the number of participants tested for resistance, multiplied by 100. The RASs for OBT components were determined by the central laboratory with the GenoSure Prime assay on post randomization samples from participants with HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol. |
Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With Viral Resistance-associated Substitutions (RASs) at Week 25 |
The number of participants from the pooled treatment group who had HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL with treatment emergent RAS at week 25 showing the type of RAS .Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With Viral RASs at Week 49 |
The number of participants from the pooled treatment group who had HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL with treatment emergent RAS at week 49 showing the type of RAS .Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group With Viral RASs at Week 97 |
The number of participants from the pooled treatment group with treatment emergent RAS at week 97 are presented, showing the type of RAS .Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group Exhibiting Antiviral Resistance of HIV-1 RNA =200 Copies/mL at Week 25 |
The number of participants from the pooled treatment group exhibiting antiviral resistance of HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL at Week 25 is presented. .Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group Exhibiting Antiviral Resistance of HIV-1 RNA =200 Copies/mL at Week 49 |
The number of participants from the pooled treatment group exhibiting antiviral resistance of HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL at Week 49 is presented. .Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Number of Participants From the Pooled Treatment Group Exhibiting Antiviral Resistance of HIV-1 RNA =200 Copies/mL at Week 97 |
The number of participants from the pooled treatment group exhibiting antiviral resistance of HIV-1 RNA =200 copies/mL at Week 97 is presented. .Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Change From Baseline Day 1 to Week 25 in Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) T-cell Counts From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 1 to Week 25 in CD4+ T-cell counts was determined by the central laboratory.. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Change From Baseline Day 1 to Week 49 in CD4+ T-cell Counts From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 1 to Week 49 in CD4+ T-cell counts was determined by the central laboratory.. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Change From Baseline Day 1 to Week 97 in CD4+ T-cell Counts From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 1 to Week 97 in CD4+ T-cell counts was determined by the central laboratory.. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 1 (baseline) and Week 97 |
|
| Secondary |
Change From Baseline Day 8 to Week 25 in CD4+ T-cell Counts From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 8 to Week 25 in CD4+ T-cell counts was determined by the central laboratory.. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 25 |
|
| Secondary |
Change From Baseline Day 8 to Week 49 in CD4+ T-cell Counts From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 8 to Week 49 in CD4+ T-cell counts was determined by the central laboratory.. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 49 |
|
| Secondary |
Change From Baseline Day 8 to Week 97 in CD4+ T-cell Counts From the Pooled Treatment Group |
The change from baseline Day 8 to Week 97 in CD4+ T-cell counts was determined by the central laboratory.. The within-group 95% CIs were calculated based on the t-distribution. Analysis of the pooled treatment group was planned per protocol, |
Day 8 (baseline) and Week 97 |
|
