View clinical trials related to Hip Fracture.
Filter by:The main aim is to assess the effectiveness of introducing a standardized intervention program for treatment of patients with a fragility fracture as measured by changes in the fracture rates and the mortality.
Since an increasing in population age, there was an increasing in geriatric patients. Most of elderly patients needed rehabilitation programs to regain their quality of life during their medical treatments. Barthel index is a functional measurement to evaluate rehabilitation improvement in chronically-ill patients and also used for evaluation of patient's self-care. Barthel index had been translated into many languages and validated in many medical conditions such as spinal cord injury, congestive heart failure, pneumonia, etc. However, Barthel index had not been translated into Thai language and validated to use in hip fracture patients. The purposes of this study were to translate the Barthel index into Thai language and to assess validity and reliability of Thai version Barthel index in hip fracture patients.
Despite many previous studies, whether anesthetic technique will significantly affect overall patient outcome, morbidity and mortality in elderly hip fracture patients is controversial. Due to old age, poor patient condition and emergent clinical settings, patients undergoing surgical procedures for hip fracture management are often subject to poor postoperative outcome and high mortality rates. While many studies have reported that regional anesthesia leads to improved postoperative outcome after hip fracture surgery, others have concluded otherwise. Moreover, because the majority of these previous studies are retrospective cohorts or systemic reviews, there is a need for randomized clinical trials to provide high quality evidence. This study aims to compare patient outcome between three different anesthetic techniques in elderly patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture management by evaluating proinflammatory cytokines, chemistry lab testing and clinical outcome between general anesthesia with either desflurane or propofol-based TIVA and spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine.
It is a prospective randomized controlled study aiming to test if tranexamic acid combined to intravenous iron before and after surgery for hip fracture in elderly can decrease peri-operative red cell transfusion.
The study evaluates the potential beneficial effects on hemodynamics when hypobaric bupivacaine is used instead of isobaric bupivacaine in continuous spinal anesthesia for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients. Half of the patients will receive hypobaric bupivacaine and the over half will reveive isobaric bupivacaine and hemodynamic data will be compared.
In comparison to previous implants, the Femoral neck system (FNS) is an approved implant by the competent authorities (CE mark). It is designated to stabilize medial femoral neck fractures in a minimal invasive technique. The implant combines an angular stable device with screw in screw technology for rotational stability. Therefore the purpose of this focused registry is to investigate how the newly developed and approved implant called FNS is performing clinically and radiologically in terms of surgical technique, intra- and postoperative complications and short term outcome.
The investigators explore the presence of AD factors beta-amyloid and tau in CSF and plasma to verify AD diagnosis in patients with acute hip fracture. Clinical dementia test is performed prior to operation. Blood samples and CSF samples are collected at surgery and blood samples are collected postoperatively at intervals. Mortality is assessed at 30 days, 3 months and 1 year. Morbidity is assessed at , 3 months and >1 year. Neuromarkers specifically addressing the inflammatory component are to be analyzed and correlated to outcome together with AD markers, as above.
Patients in Clopidogrel therapy alone or in combination with acetylsalicylic acid (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) presenting with a hip-fracture represent the surgeon with the dilemma of putting the patient at risk of a major blood loss during and after surgery, or putting the patient at risk of a thromboembolic event after surgery. The investigators hypothesize that the risk of a major blood loss in patients that are still under the effect of Clopidogrel or DAPT during or after hip-fracture surgery is relatively low. The investigators have conducted a retrospective observational study on hip-fracture patients to test this hypothesis.
The goal of the study is to evaluate whether pain control achieved by Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Blockade (USFNB) is equal in efficacy to standard pain management practice of parenteral injection of opioid pain medication in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with hip fracture.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the external validity of a randomized controlled trial comparing choice of hip arthroplasty for elderly patients (>80 years) with a displaced femoral neck fracture. The hypotheses are that patient reported hip function, quality of life are better and healthier in those included in the randomized controlled trial than those excluded. The external validity of the randomized controlled trial is acceptable. A prospective randomized controlled trial is planned and patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture will be included and randomized between either a hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. All patients screened will be included in a prospective cohort study for evaluation of the external validity of the randomized controlled trial. The prospective cohort study will consist of 3 different groups. Patients included in the randomized controlled trial will form group 1. Patients eligible for the randomized controlled trial but did not give their informed consent and therefore excluded, form group 2. Patients with a femoral neck fracture which by any reason were excluded form group 3. Primary endpoint is patient-reported hip function (Harris hip score) and pain on the operated extremity evaluated with VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) and patient reported quality of life evaluated with EuroQol (EQ-5D). Secondary outcome measurement are the frequency of the complications, periprosthetic fracture, dislocation, revision surgery due to wound infection (deep and superficial) and loosening of the components. Baseline data, age, sex, comorbidity, cognitive status, weight, height, motor function, complications and reoperations. Follow up is performed 1-2 years after surgery. Group 1 is followed up in the ongoing randomized controlled trial by visits to the orthopedic department at Danderyd Hospital. Group 2 and 3 are followed up by telephone interview 1-2 year after surgery.