View clinical trials related to Hip Arthrosis.
Filter by:Rehabilitation after primary knee or hip arthroplasty may include performing exercises with a physiotherapist. For patients who can work well with a computer, tablet or smartphone, it is now possible to use a mobile application (e.g. moveUp) to carry out a large part of the exercises more independently. This is done with online guidance by a physiotherapist via a mobile application that is CE marked in Europe. This study will investigate whether the effect of the mobile application on knee or hip rehabilitation and quality of life is equal to that of standard care (i.e. without the use of a mobile application).
Rationale of the study is to evaluate through a prospective randomized controlled study if a modified direct superior posterolateral approach (sperimental approach) to the hip articulation which entirely spares i.e. avoids the sacrifice of the fascia lata might elicit a better outcome in terms of gait, balance, strengths recovery, clinical performance, patient reported outcome measurement (Short Form-12(SF-12); Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)) and overall recovery time in patients undergoing TotalHipArthroplasty with the aid of dedicated, modified instrumentation in order to properly access this modified route. The investigators expect an improvement on selected gait analysis parameters in sperimental approach in order of 2% of range of motion (ROM) recorded 1 month after surgery. Based on this assumption sample size calculation will be conducted.
Periprosthetic bone-loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA), detected as an early migration of the prosthesis, may predict later loosening. The investigators hypothesized that by reducing bone resorption after THA with bisphosphonates, it might be possible to achieve better early fixation of the implant. Nineteen patients suffering arthrosis were recruited to a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical pilot trial. Patients were operated with an uncemented Bimetric stem with tantalum markers, the acetabular cup and liner were chosen by the surgeon. The femoral proximal intramedullary canal was rinsed with 1mM (millimole) clodronate, that was done by adding the clodronate to the 1000 ml 0.9% NaCl (sodium chloride) in nine patients and rinsing solution was the pure 0.9% NaCl for 10 patients. These rinsing packages were labeled only with the code from the pharmacy of the hospital. These patients were followed for two years using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the Harris hip score (HHS). The purpose of the investigator's study was to examine whether the local intraoperative administration of clodronate could reduce periprosthetic bone loss and further stem migration after primary THA.
The study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of a home-based rehabilitation program using a novel digital biofeedback system against conventional home-based rehabilitation after total hip replacement This system allows the patients to perform independent rehabilitation sessions at home, under remote monitoring from the clinical team. The investigators hypothesise that the clinical outcomes of a home-based rehabilitation program will be at least similar to the outcomes of a traditional home-based rehabilitation with face-to-face sessions. This is a single-center, prospective, parallel-group pilot study with active comparator. Patients will be enrolled pre-operatively and then divided into 2 groups: experimental group and conventional rehabilitation group. Both groups will perform an 8-week rehabilitation program starting between day 7 and 10 after surgery. The experimental group will perform daily exercise sessions at home using the system, under remote monitoring from a physical therapist. The conventional rehabilitation group will perform 3 home-based rehabilitation sessions per week, each with 1h duration, given by a physical therapist. Outcomes will be measured at weeks 4 and 8 and then at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome is the change in patient performance measured by the Timed-up-and-Go (TUG) test between in comparison with the pre-operative score. Secondary outcomes will be measured in terms of: a) Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS); b) range of motion of the hip joint (lying flexion/abduction; standing flexion/adbuction/hyperextension)
In this prospective, randomized study, investigators will look at the outcome of total hip arthroplasty through the anterior approach in regard to the surgical treatment of the anterior hip capsule. At this time, there are 2 different techniques: one is excising this capsule and the second one is cutting the capsule and repairing it at the end of the procedure. The investigators set out to determine whether incising or repairing the capsule will benefit the patients in terms of postoperative pain level, range of motion of the hip joint, joint stability, surgical time and blood loss. Both preserving and excising the joint capsule are accepted techniques in performing total hip arthroplasty. The Investigators hypothesize that capsulectomy may allow for reduction in operative time, provide superior surgical exposure, and increased range of motion after surgery. The influence on post operative pain and dislocation rate is unknown.
The investigators want to examine if specific acetabular liner designs can be a contributing factor to audible squeaking associated with CoC bearings. The aim of the present study is to compare two different designed and well documented acetabular component systems with reference to squeaking and other noises from the hip.