Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Phase III Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Photodynamic Therapy Using Porfimer Sodium for Injection as Treatment for Unresectable Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
Verified date | August 2019 |
Source | Concordia Laboratories Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a combination of a drug, porfimer sodium (Photofrin), which is
activated by a light from a laser that emits no heat. This technique works to allow the
medical doctor to specifically target and destroy abnormal or cancer cells while limiting
damage to surrounding healthy tissue. The activation of the drug is done by lighting the
abnormal areas using a fiber optic device (very fine fiber like a fishing line that permits
light transmission) inserted into a flexible tube with a light called cholangioscope for the
bile duct. The light will activate the porfimer sodium concentrated in the abnormal tissue,
leading to its destruction.
This research study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PDT with porfimer sodium
administered with Standard Medical Care (SMC) compared to SMC alone on the overall survival
time of patients with non-operable advanced cholangiocarcinoma, a rare cancer of the bile
ducts. It will involve 200 patients across North America and Europe. Other countries may
participate if needed. Participation will last at least 18 months.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 28 |
Est. completion date | January 12, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | January 12, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Males or females aged 18 or older - Diagnosed with radiologically and biopsy or cytology confirmed inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Bismuth Tumor Stage III/IV - Non-menopausal or non-sterile female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative serum beta-HCG and use a medically acceptable form of birth control - Able to sign an informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Diagnostic of cholangiocarcinoma made more than 45 days prior to randomization - Cholangiocarcinoma with extra-hepatic metastasis or concurrent non-solid malignancy - Presence or history of other neoplasms (treated during the last five years prior to study entry) other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal carcinoma of the skin - Previously received photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma - Previously undergone surgical resection of the cholangiocarcinoma - Previously undergone chemotherapy, brachytherapy, or radiotherapy prior to entering the study - Previously undergone metal stent insertion - Porphyria or hypersensitivity to porphyrins (constituents of porfimer sodium), gemcitabine, cisplatin or other platinum-containing compounds - Presence of infection other than the infection of the bile duct (cholangitis) - Acute or chronic medical or psychological illnesses that prevent endoscopy procedures - Abnormal blood test results - Severe impairment of your kidney or liver function - Decompensated cirrhosis - Pregnant or intend to become pregnant, breastfeeding or intend to breast-feed during this study - Participated in another drug study within 90 days before this one - Unable or unwilling to complete the follow-up evaluations required for the study |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | CHUM Hôpital St-Luc | Montreal | Quebec |
Canada | St. Michael's Hospital | Toronto | Ontario |
Germany | Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR) | Essen | Nordrhein Westfalen |
Germany | Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe Universität Frankfurt | Frankfurt | Hessen |
Germany | Medizinische Hochschule Hannover | Hannover | Niedersachsen |
Germany | Klinikum Ludwigsburg | Ludwigsburg | Baden Wuerttemberg |
Germany | Klinikum Mannheim GmbH | Mannheim | Baden Wuerttemberg |
Korea, Republic of | Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital | Bucheon City | Gyeonggi-do |
Korea, Republic of | Seoul National University Bundang Hospital | Seongnam-si | Gyeonggi-do |
Korea, Republic of | Konkuk University Medical Center | Seoul | Gwangjin-gu |
Korea, Republic of | Seoul National University Hospital | Seoul | |
Korea, Republic of | Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System | Seoul | Seodaemun-gu |
Switzerland | UniversitätsSpital Zürich | Zürich | |
United States | University of Colorado Denver | Aurora | Colorado |
United States | SUNY Downstate Medical Center | Brooklyn | New York |
United States | Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Buffalo | New York |
United States | Methodist Dallas Medical Center | Dallas | Texas |
United States | Henry Ford Health System | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | Western Regional Medical Center, Inc. | Goodyear | Arizona |
United States | Oschner Medical Center | Kenner | Louisiana |
United States | University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York |
United States | Weill Cornell Medical College | New York | New York |
United States | Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania |
United States | Allegheny Center for Digestive Health - AHN ASRI | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | UC Davis Medical Center | Sacramento | California |
United States | Mayo Clinic Cancer Center | Scottsdale | Arizona |
United States | Virginia Mason Medical Center | Seattle | Washington |
United States | Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Children's Hospital | Spokane | Washington |
United States | Southwestern Regional Medical Center, Inc. | Tulsa | Oklahoma |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Concordia Laboratories Inc. |
United States, Canada, Germany, Korea, Republic of, Switzerland,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Overall Survival Time | Time from the date of randomization until the date of death or the last date the subject was known to be alive | Up to 26 months | |
Secondary | Time-to-bilirubin Response | From the date of randomization until the date of first documented bilirubin response | Up to 30 days | |
Secondary | Best Overall Tumor Response as Measured by the RECIST 1.1 Criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) | From the start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence the RECIST 1.1 criteria are applied (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) | Up to 26 months | |
Secondary | Time-to-tumor Progression | From the date of first documented response until the date that tumor progression was assessed | Up to 26 months | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline on Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. | Baseline, 7 days | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death. | Baseline, up to 4 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death. | Baseline, 13 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death. | Baseline, 16 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. | Baseline, 29 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. | Baseline, 41 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. | Baseline, 54 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. | Baseline, 66 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) | The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. | Baseline, 78 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. | Baseline, 7 days | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. | Baseline, up to 4 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. | Baseline, 13 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. | Baseline, 16 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. | Baseline, 29 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. | Baseline, 41 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. | Baseline, 54 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. | Baseline, 66 weeks | |
Secondary | Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 | Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. | Baseline, 78 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05678218 -
Preoperative Evaluation of Lymph Nodes of Cholangiocarcinoma
|
||
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT01715402 -
Optimization of Health Expenditure in Liver Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03320980 -
RALPPS in Patients With Hilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00721175 -
Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Plastic Stent Compare to Metallic Stent in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05626127 -
MRI-based Clinico-radiomics Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis Status of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05239169 -
Immunotherapy With Durva and Treme With or Without Capecitabine in Adjuvant Treatment for Biliary Tract Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02178280 -
Safety Study of Liver Transplantation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT02955771 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of PDT Using Deuteporfin for Unresectable Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03132649 -
Impact of Three-dimensional Visualization on Operation Strategy and Complications for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04561453 -
Feasibility Study of Multi-Platform Profiling of Resected Biliary Tract Cancer
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02108145 -
Percutaneous Bilateral Versus Unilateral Metal Stent for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03739164 -
Tampa Associating Microwave Liver Ablation With Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (TAMLAPS)
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02801500 -
Superior Bilioenteric Anastomosis by Magnetic Compressive Technique
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01549795 -
Liver Transplantation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma in Association With Neoadjuvant Radio- and Chemo-therapy
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06106750 -
Endoscopic Scissors Cutting Nasobiliary Duct VS Bilateral Plastic Stent
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02042443 -
Trametinib or Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Refractory or Advanced Biliary or Gallbladder Cancer or That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05551299 -
Treatment of Non-resectable Bile Duct Cancer With Radiofrequency Ablation or Photodynamic Therapy
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01093222 -
Sorafenib Tosylate and Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Gallbladder Cancer or Cholangiocarcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04779788 -
I-125 Seeds Loaded Stent Insertion for Inoperable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04611100 -
Efficacy of Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation in Combination With Metallic Biliary Stenting in Advanced Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
|
N/A |