Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02082522
Other study ID # PIN-PHO1201
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date November 12, 2014
Est. completion date January 12, 2017

Study information

Verified date August 2019
Source Concordia Laboratories Inc.
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a combination of a drug, porfimer sodium (Photofrin), which is activated by a light from a laser that emits no heat. This technique works to allow the medical doctor to specifically target and destroy abnormal or cancer cells while limiting damage to surrounding healthy tissue. The activation of the drug is done by lighting the abnormal areas using a fiber optic device (very fine fiber like a fishing line that permits light transmission) inserted into a flexible tube with a light called cholangioscope for the bile duct. The light will activate the porfimer sodium concentrated in the abnormal tissue, leading to its destruction.

This research study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PDT with porfimer sodium administered with Standard Medical Care (SMC) compared to SMC alone on the overall survival time of patients with non-operable advanced cholangiocarcinoma, a rare cancer of the bile ducts. It will involve 200 patients across North America and Europe. Other countries may participate if needed. Participation will last at least 18 months.


Description:

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a combination of a drug, porfimer sodium (Photofrin), which is activated by a light from a laser that emits no heat. This technique works to allow the medical doctor to specifically target and destroy abnormal or cancer cells while limiting damage to surrounding healthy tissue. The activation of the drug is done by lighting the abnormal areas using a fiber optic device (very fine fiber like a fishing line that permits light transmission) inserted into a flexible tube with a light called cholangioscope for the bile duct. The light will activate the porfimer sodium concentrated in the abnormal tissue, leading to its destruction.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is defined as primary malignant tumors of the bile ducts. The exact etiology remains unknown. These cancerous tumors block the bile flow and can be intrahepatic (IH) or extrahepatic (EH). The distinction between IH- and EH-CCA has become increasingly important, as the epidemiological features (i.e., incidence and risk factors), the biologic and pathologic characteristics and the clinical course are largely different. Unfortunately, most subjects are found to have metastases or unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis. Median survival for subjects with unresectable perihilar-CCA varies between five and eight months. The one-year survival is 50%, with 20% surviving at two years and 10% at three years. Unresected CCA is a rapidly fatal process with cholangitis being a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in these subjects.

This study was designed to confirm the efficacy of PHOPDT + standard medical care (SMC) defined as stents plus gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy regimen on the overall survival of subjects with unresectable cholestasis perihilar Bismuth type III or IV - tumor TNM stage III or IVa CCA.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 28
Est. completion date January 12, 2017
Est. primary completion date January 12, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Males or females aged 18 or older

- Diagnosed with radiologically and biopsy or cytology confirmed inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Bismuth Tumor Stage III/IV

- Non-menopausal or non-sterile female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative serum beta-HCG and use a medically acceptable form of birth control

- Able to sign an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- Diagnostic of cholangiocarcinoma made more than 45 days prior to randomization

- Cholangiocarcinoma with extra-hepatic metastasis or concurrent non-solid malignancy

- Presence or history of other neoplasms (treated during the last five years prior to study entry) other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or basal carcinoma of the skin

- Previously received photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma

- Previously undergone surgical resection of the cholangiocarcinoma

- Previously undergone chemotherapy, brachytherapy, or radiotherapy prior to entering the study

- Previously undergone metal stent insertion

- Porphyria or hypersensitivity to porphyrins (constituents of porfimer sodium), gemcitabine, cisplatin or other platinum-containing compounds

- Presence of infection other than the infection of the bile duct (cholangitis)

- Acute or chronic medical or psychological illnesses that prevent endoscopy procedures

- Abnormal blood test results

- Severe impairment of your kidney or liver function

- Decompensated cirrhosis

- Pregnant or intend to become pregnant, breastfeeding or intend to breast-feed during this study

- Participated in another drug study within 90 days before this one

- Unable or unwilling to complete the follow-up evaluations required for the study

Study Design


Intervention

Drug:
Photodynamic therapy-Photofrin
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the i.v. injection of Photofrin (2 mg/kg) followed by the illumination of the tumor using a fiber optic device during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC). Two days after the injection, a laser light (180 J/cm(2)) will be applied to the tumor. A second light application will be given 96-120 hours after Photofrin injection if PDT could not initially be performed on all sides of the tumor. Post illumination, all patients will undergo stenting as part of standard medical care procedure. Up to 3 additional courses of PDT using a light dose of 120 J/cm(2) may be given at 3-month intervals.
Procedure:
Stenting procedure
As per standard medical procedures, stenting procedure consists in the placement of stents above the main tumors of the right and left hepatic bile ducts via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) when the ERCP approach has been unsuccessful.
Drug:
Chemotherapy regimen
The regimen will comprise gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2)) followed by cisplatin (25 mg/m(2)), each administered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (21 day-cycle) for four cycles. An additional 12 weeks of the same chemotherapy regimen may be administered if there is no disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada CHUM Hôpital St-Luc Montreal Quebec
Canada St. Michael's Hospital Toronto Ontario
Germany Universitätsklinikum Essen (AöR) Essen Nordrhein Westfalen
Germany Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe Universität Frankfurt Frankfurt Hessen
Germany Medizinische Hochschule Hannover Hannover Niedersachsen
Germany Klinikum Ludwigsburg Ludwigsburg Baden Wuerttemberg
Germany Klinikum Mannheim GmbH Mannheim Baden Wuerttemberg
Korea, Republic of Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital Bucheon City Gyeonggi-do
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam-si Gyeonggi-do
Korea, Republic of Konkuk University Medical Center Seoul Gwangjin-gu
Korea, Republic of Seoul National University Hospital Seoul
Korea, Republic of Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System Seoul Seodaemun-gu
Switzerland UniversitätsSpital Zürich Zürich
United States University of Colorado Denver Aurora Colorado
United States SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn New York
United States Roswell Park Cancer Institute Buffalo New York
United States Methodist Dallas Medical Center Dallas Texas
United States Henry Ford Health System Detroit Michigan
United States Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina
United States Western Regional Medical Center, Inc. Goodyear Arizona
United States Oschner Medical Center Kenner Louisiana
United States University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles California
United States Columbia University Medical Center New York New York
United States Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York
United States Thomas Jefferson University Philadelphia Pennsylvania
United States Allegheny Center for Digestive Health - AHN ASRI Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento California
United States Mayo Clinic Cancer Center Scottsdale Arizona
United States Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle Washington
United States Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center and Children's Hospital Spokane Washington
United States Southwestern Regional Medical Center, Inc. Tulsa Oklahoma

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Concordia Laboratories Inc.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Canada,  Germany,  Korea, Republic of,  Switzerland, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Overall Survival Time Time from the date of randomization until the date of death or the last date the subject was known to be alive Up to 26 months
Secondary Time-to-bilirubin Response From the date of randomization until the date of first documented bilirubin response Up to 30 days
Secondary Best Overall Tumor Response as Measured by the RECIST 1.1 Criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) From the start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence the RECIST 1.1 criteria are applied (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) Up to 26 months
Secondary Time-to-tumor Progression From the date of first documented response until the date that tumor progression was assessed Up to 26 months
Secondary Change From Baseline on Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. Baseline, 7 days
Secondary Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death. Baseline, up to 4 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death. Baseline, 13 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. A score of 100% means there are no complaints and no evidence of disease. A score of 80% means there is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. A score of 0% means death. Baseline, 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. Baseline, 29 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. Baseline, 41 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. Baseline, 54 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. Baseline, 66 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Performance Status on the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) The Karnofsky Performance Scale scores range from 0% to 100%. The lower the Karnofsky score, the worse likelihood of survival. However, the premature termination of the study does not allow for a meaningful analysis of the scale where 100% means no complaints with no evidence of disease, 80% is normal activity with effort and some signs or symptoms of disease. Baseline, 78 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. Baseline, 7 days
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. Baseline, up to 4 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. Baseline, 13 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. Baseline, 16 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. Baseline, 29 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. Baseline, 41 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. Baseline, 54 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. Baseline, 66 weeks
Secondary Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life on the 4- and 7-point EORTC QLQ-C30 Final European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scores for multi-item scales and single-item measures will range from 0 to 100. This questionnaire assesses the quality of life of cancer patients. A high score represents a high/healthy level of functioning, basically a high Quality of Life. Baseline, 78 weeks
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05678218 - Preoperative Evaluation of Lymph Nodes of Cholangiocarcinoma
Enrolling by invitation NCT01715402 - Optimization of Health Expenditure in Liver Surgery N/A
Completed NCT03320980 - RALPPS in Patients With Hilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma N/A
Completed NCT00721175 - Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Plastic Stent Compare to Metallic Stent in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05626127 - MRI-based Clinico-radiomics Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis Status of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
Active, not recruiting NCT05239169 - Immunotherapy With Durva and Treme With or Without Capecitabine in Adjuvant Treatment for Biliary Tract Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT02178280 - Safety Study of Liver Transplantation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT02955771 - Efficacy and Safety Study of PDT Using Deuteporfin for Unresectable Advanced Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03132649 - Impact of Three-dimensional Visualization on Operation Strategy and Complications for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
Recruiting NCT04561453 - Feasibility Study of Multi-Platform Profiling of Resected Biliary Tract Cancer
Recruiting NCT02108145 - Percutaneous Bilateral Versus Unilateral Metal Stent for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Phase 2/Phase 3
Enrolling by invitation NCT03739164 - Tampa Associating Microwave Liver Ablation With Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (TAMLAPS)
Recruiting NCT02801500 - Superior Bilioenteric Anastomosis by Magnetic Compressive Technique N/A
Recruiting NCT01549795 - Liver Transplantation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma in Association With Neoadjuvant Radio- and Chemo-therapy N/A
Recruiting NCT06106750 - Endoscopic Scissors Cutting Nasobiliary Duct VS Bilateral Plastic Stent N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02042443 - Trametinib or Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Refractory or Advanced Biliary or Gallbladder Cancer or That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05551299 - Treatment of Non-resectable Bile Duct Cancer With Radiofrequency Ablation or Photodynamic Therapy Phase 4
Completed NCT01093222 - Sorafenib Tosylate and Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Gallbladder Cancer or Cholangiocarcinoma Phase 2
Enrolling by invitation NCT04779788 - I-125 Seeds Loaded Stent Insertion for Inoperable Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma N/A
Completed NCT04611100 - Efficacy of Intraductal Radiofrequency Ablation in Combination With Metallic Biliary Stenting in Advanced Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma N/A