View clinical trials related to Hernia, Ventral.
Filter by:Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Study group: Patients with incisional hernia post liver transplantation Control group: Patients with incisional hernia post any other laparotomy in the upper quadrant. Primary study outcome parameter: Risk of hernia recurrence. Secondary study outcome parameters: - Hernia repair-related infection rate - Postoperative morbidity Statistical analysis: Comparison of study versus control group, univariate and multivariate analysis, Chi² and Mann-Whitney-U tests. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.
Background: Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias has gained popularity, since many studies and a recent meta-analysis have reported encouraging results and recurrence rates similar to open repair. The choice of the mesh and fixation methods is of paramount importance during laparoscopic approach, and nowadays, lightweight macropore meshes specifically designed for laparoscopic approach represent the first choice in several studies, due to the biomechanical properties and the optimal integration into the abdominal wall. No data with statistical relevance exist on the choice of fixation methods. Primary end point of the present Italian multicentric prospective randomized trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two different tacks to fix the lightweight polypropylene mesh (Physiomesh™) during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: metallic spiral tacks (Protack™) vs absorbable "U" shaped tacks (Securestrap™) Design of the Study: 200 patients with ventral hernia will be randomized into two groups: Group A patients will be submitted to laparoscopic repair by Physiomesh fixed by Protack; Group B patients will be submitted to laparoscopic repair by Physiomesh fixed by Securestrap. Blind randomization will be guaranteed by an on-line software with specific key access for every surgical unit participating in the study. Patients demographics and characteristics, preoperative studies, intraoperative and postoperative results and complications, as well as scheduled follow-up will be recorded and uploaded to the database. Data represented by continuous variables will be expressed as arithmetic mean +/- standard deviation. Other data will be expressed as geometric mean +/- 95% confidence interval. Data representing low incidence events will be expressed as number and percentage of occurrence for each group. Statistical significance for all analyses will be indicated by a p value of 0.05 or less.
Collect data on safety, performance, and effectiveness of Phasix Mesh in subject requiring primary ventral and incisional hernias.
Hernias are often treated using a prosthetic mesh to add support to the healing wound. Prosthetic meshes have been used for decades to repair ventral hernias, level 1 data regarding which type of mesh to use is limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects, good and/or bad, of two types of prosthetic meshes: one that is made from pig skin (called a "biologic prosthetic"), and one that is made in a laboratory (called a "synthetic prosthetic"). This study will include some patients who have an infection in/near the hernia, and other patients who do not have an infection. We expect the synthetic mesh to be associated with a higher rate of early post-operative surgical site infection and fluid collections (seromas), while we expect the biologic mesh to be associated with a higher rate of recurrence.
The purpose of this study is to determine if a Transabdominal Plane Block will decrease patient pain and pain medication use after a laparoscopic ventral (ventral, umbilical, incisional) hernia repair with mesh.
The primary objective of this study is to examine and compare the outcomes associated with the use of Flex HD®, a human acellular dermal matrix (HADM), and Strattice™, a porcine acellular dermal matrix, (PADM) when used as a reinforcing material in the repair of large complicated abdominal wall hernias.
Prospective, multi center, single arm, clinical study to obtain clinical experience with the use of SERI® Surgical Scaffold for soft tissue support in ventral hernia repair.
Introduction: Closure of the hernia gap in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair before mesh reinforcement has gained increasing acceptance among surgeons despite creating a tension-based repair. Beneficial effects of this technique have sporadically been reported but no evidence is available from randomized controlled trials. The primary purpose is to compare early postoperative activity-related pain in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair with closure of the gap with patients undergoing standard laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (non-closure of the gap). Secondary outcomes are cosmesis and hernia-related quality of life (QoL) at 30-days and clinical or radiological recurrence and chronic pain after 2 years. Material and Methods: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded study is planned. Based on power calculation we will include 40 patients in each arm. Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic umbilical, epigastric, or umbilical trocar-site hernia repair at Hvidovre Hospital, Herlev Hospital, or Køge Hospital, who meet the inclusion criteria, are invited to participate. Conclusion: The technique with closure of the gap may induce more postoperative pain, but may be superior with regard to other important surgical outcomes. No studies have previously investigated closure of the gap in the setting of a randomised controlled trial.
Single-arm study of Phasix Mesh in High Risk patients looking at SSI and recurrence rates.
Ventral hernias, primary and recurrent, are major surgical challenge. We aim to investigate efficacy of modified technique of ventral hernias repair: an "open intraperitoneal mesh" technique.