View clinical trials related to Hepatitis.
Filter by:Rationale: Currently, there is no curative therapy available for patients that are chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Especially the presence of a viral reservoir of stable episomal, covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in the nucleus of infected hepatocytes poses a great challenge for the development of curative therapies. HBV cccDNA acts as the template for production of viral proteins and HBV genomes. In a preclinical study, terbinafine (an antifungal agent) was identified as a potent and specific suppressor of HBx-mediated cccDNA transcription. HBx is an accessory viral protein of HBV which has been proven to be essential for HBV replication and enhances replication at the transcriptional level in vivo. The suppression of cccDNA transcription results in a strong reduction of the production of viral genomes (RNA and DNA) as well as viral proteins. This will allow recovery of the immune system, increase viral clearance and prevent replenishment of the cccDNA pool in the hepatocyte, all contributing to cure chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Objective: to provide proof of concept for the inhibition of HBx mediated cccDNA transcription by terbinafine, both as monotherapy and add-on therapy next to tenofovir. Secondary outcomes will be the safety and tolerability of terbinafine in this specific group. Study design: This pilot study is a stratified, single center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ascending proof of concept clinical trial. Study population: patients chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus with a normal liver function and no signs of liver damage, who do not use any antiviral medication (group A, n=16) or are treated with tenofovir > 6 months (group B, n=16). Intervention: Patients will be randomly allocated to daily oral treatment with terbinafine or a matched placebo, either as monotherapy (group A) or as add-on therapy to tenofovir (group B). Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcomes: decline in level of serum HBsAg >0.32log10 IU/mL in both groups A and B and decline in serum HBV DNA >0.86log10 in group A at the end of study treatment (week 10 vs baseline). Secondary outcomes: 1) Safety and tolerability of terbinafine as mono- or combination therapy; 2) level of serum HBsAg and HBV DNA at 3 months follow-up; 3) decline of HBsAg levels over time (all visits); 4) HBV RNA, large HBsAg (LHBs) HBcrAg levels, and HBeAg status at baseline and end of study 4). Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients participating in this study will undergo physical examinations and blood sample collections (13 samples and in total 467.5 mL). They will also be asked to fill in the HBQOL and EQ5D5L quality of life questionnaires and a medicine diary. In total there will be 13 visits in the hospital of which 7 will be for blood collection only. Terbinafine can induce liver damage 1 of 50,000 to 120,000 prescriptions (LiverTox), a weekly safety laboratory control is implemented in the visits to detect possible liver toxicity in an early stage and prevent liver damage.
The study aimed to evaluate the relationship between hepatitis B virus genotype and treatment response in children with chronic hepatitis B with specific treatment indications. This is a prospective cohort study, with a follow-up period of at least 12 months, conducted at Children's Hospital 1 and City Children's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The patient's blood was taken to be tested for hepatitis B virus genotyping using Sanger sequencing at the Center for Molecular Biomedicine Ho Chi Minh City. The research hypothesis is that genotype is related to treatment response.
The hepatitis A virus (HAV) is a significant global public health concern. The hepatitis A virus is transmitted primarily by the faecal-oral route, leading to acute hepatitis. Symptoms include low-grade fever, anorexia, jaundice, and typically resolve without complications. However, HAV infection in patients with chronic liver disease, especially those over 50 years old, may result in more severe outcomes, including fulminant hepatitis, with a higher mortality rate compared to the general population HAV vaccination is a cornerstone of prevention, especially in high-risk groups. Currently, there is a recommendation to vaccinate patients with chronic liver disease against HAV infection. However, these patients often have compromised immune responses, leading to lower vaccine efficacy compared to the general population. The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of the standard 2-dose (0, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen with an intensive 3-dose (0, 1, 6 months) schedule in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Compared the seroconversion rate of the standard 2-dose (0, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen versus the intensive 3-dose (0, 1, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. - Compared the antibody levels against the hepatitis A virus (Anti-HAV IgG) of the standard 2-dose (0, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen versus the intensive 3-dose (0, 1, 6 months) hepatitis A vaccination regimen in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.
The goal of this observational study is to expound the population and characteristics of pathogenic microorganisms with co-infection, draw the pedigree of pathogenic microorganisms, and evaluate its influence on disease outcome in patients with severe hepatitis (liver failure). The main questions it aims to answer are: - Mapping of infectious agents in patients with severe hepatitis (liver failure) - Constructing early warning predictive models to explore how to give an individualized regimen of integrated immune function.
The aim of this project is to set up a cross-sectional cohort study (France, Germany, The Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Switzerland, Italy, United Kingdom and Portugal) to assess the implementation of EACS guidelines for HDV-testing among PLWH with positive HbsAg and thereby evaluate the prevalence of HDV infection among HIV/HBV-coinfected in 2023, as well as corresponding risk factors. In addition to the testing itself, this study will also set up a cohort and databasee for future HDV studies among PLWH, including clinical, virological und laboratory parameters. 1. Analyze the rate of HDV-testing and evaluate the prevalence of HDV-infection by testing. 1. Evaluation of former screening of HDV by assessing existing data at study sites. 2. Determination of the HDV prevalence in European PLWH and HBV coinfection. 2. Setting up a database of all PLWH with HBV/HDV coinfection 1. Analysis of transmission risk factors for HDV coinfection 2. Asses the rate of HDV positive patients with ongoing HDV replication. 3. Define the liver disease state by APRI score, fibroscan, ultrasound and routine laboratory test results.
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase IIa clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of GST-HG131 tablets in patients with chronic hepatitis B
This is a single-center, proof-of-concept pilot study which uses a cross-over design to compare two dietary interventions/treatments: Western Diet (WD) vs Mediterranean (MD) and impact on quality-of-life parameters in AIH. Participants will receive both treatments through two phases and will be divided into two groups.
The aim of these study to determine the prevalence of hepatitis Delta virus (HDV) infections and the prognosis of HDV patients in Turkey's southeast. The investigators intend to arrange training sessions for 250 family physicians in Diyarbakir, Batman, Mardin, and Sanliurfa in order to determine those goals. The investigators will talk about diagnosing hepatitis B virus (HBV), HDV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections during these events. To ensure that patients with simultaneous HDV infection are evaluated for HIV/HCV and to detect liver fibrosis with a non-invasive method.
Capillary blood sample results are compared to venous blood results
his clinical trial was conducted to determine the non-inferiority and safety of prophylactic antiviral treatment of Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) compared to Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in patients with malignant hematological diseases requiring prophylactic hepatitis B antiviral treatment. Confirm. In the case of TAF, domestic evidence when used as a first-line treatment is insufficient, so in this clinical trial, the virus suppression effect compared to TDF during the first administration of TAF to patients with malignant hematological diseases requiring prophylactic hepatitis B antiviral treatment was investigated. We aim to secure non-inferiority and additionally confirm the safety of TAF's known advantages of reducing renal function damage and protecting bone function.