The Role of Bacterial Overgrowth and Delayed Intestinal Transit in Hepatic Encephalopathy

Hepatitis C Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Role of Bacterial Overgrowth and Delayed Intestinal Transit in Hepatic Encephalopathy. Phase A: Breath Testing and Colonic Transit in Hepatic Encephalopathy. Phase B: A Randomized Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial of Rifaximin for Hepatic Encephalopathy

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00281502
• Other study ID #: Salix-RifaxPSE-BactOvrGrwth-01
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: Phase 2
• First received: January 20, 2006
• Last updated: November 4, 2010
• Start date: December 2005
• Est. completion date: December 2012

Study information

• Verified date: November 2010
• Source: Weill Medical College of Cornell University
• Contact: Sam Sigal, M.D.
• Phone: 646 962-5483
• Email: shs2015[@]med.cornell.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Food and Drug Administration
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study will be conducted in two phases. Phase A will evaluate the contribution of bacterial overgrowth and colonic inertia to development of Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE)in 50 ambulatory subjects with HE and hepatitis C cirrhosis. This phase will include a Screening and Evaluation Visit.

Phase B will evaluate the effect of rifaximin on bacterial outgrowth and severity of HE in 20 of the subjects enrolled in Phase A who have a somewhat greater degree of encephalopathy.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the following:

1. the relationship between bacterial overgrowth and the presence and severity of HE in patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis;

2. the effectiveness and tolerability of rifaximin relative to placebo in treatment of HE associated with hepatitis C cirrhosis;

3. the relationship between bacterial overgrowth and the presence and severity of HE before and after rifaximin treatment.

Description:

Hepatic encephalopathy is a frequent and occasionally refractory complication of cirrhosis and is associated with impaired quality of life. Its severity may not correlate with other parameters of liver dysfunction. Although multiple pathogenic mechanisms for the condition have been proposed, most include the participation of bacterial toxins, especially ammonia, produced in the gastrointestinal tract. Treatment options for hepatic encephalopathy at this time are limited to lactulose and neomycin. Lactulose is frequently poorly tolerated, and many patients are non-compliant with its use. In patients with renal insufficiency in whom hepatic encephalopathy is frequently problematic, use of neomycin is contraindicated due to ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity.

Autonomic dysfunction is common in patients with cirrhosis and could contribute to the development of hepatic encephalopathy by impairment of intestinal motility, leading to bacterial overgrowth and colonic inertia.

The following questions will be addressed:

A. Is impaired intestinal transit and bacterial overgrowth associated with the presence and severity of hepatic encephalopathy?

50 patients will undergo a detailed clinical evaluation for severity of liver disease, hepatic encephalopathy and assessment of intestinal transit and bacterial overgrowth with radiographic marker study and breath test analysis. Multivariate analysis will then be performed to determine the relationship of intestinal transit and evidence of bacterial overgrowth with the presence and severity of hepatic encephalopathy.

B. Does treatment with rifaximin improve bacterial overgrowth and hepatic encephalopathy?

20 patients from the above population with significant encephalopathy will be randomized to receive either rifaximin or placebo. Post-treatment evaluation for severity of hepatic encephalopathy and breath test analysis for bacterial overgrowth will then be performed. The effect of treatment on changes in hepatic encephalopathy and bacterial overgrowth and the relationship between changes in bacterial overgrowth and severity of hepatic encephalopathy will also be assessed.

Phase A Endpoints: Degree of bacterial overgrowth and its correlation with the grade of hepatic encephalopathy (if present).

Phase B Endpoints: To demonstrate improvement in degree of HE with treatment of Rifaximin

Efficacy Endpoints The primary efficacy endpoint for Phase B of the study will be the change from baseline in the proportion of patients with no HE, minimal HE (no symptoms, abnormal psychometric testing), mild persistent HE (mild symptoms), and persistent Stage II HE (presence of asterixis, history of hospitalization for spontaneous Stage III or IV HE).

Secondary efficacy endpoints for Phase B will be the following:

To demonstrate improvement in intestinal transit time for patients (based on Lactulose Hydrogen Breath Test) To demonstrate improvement in bacterial overgrowth, improved insomnia, flatulence, and quality of life.

To demonstrate that rifaximin improved patients' symptoms of insomnia, flatulence, and quality of life measure with the degree of bacterial overload and the impaired intestinal transit time.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 50
• Est. completion date: December 2012
• Est. primary completion date: December 2012
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Phase A Inclusion Criteria:

• Subject is 18 to 70 years of age, inclusive.

• Subject has cirrhosis due to chronic HCV infection as documented by:

• Subject has evidence of hepatic encephalopathy as evidenced by:

• Neuro-psychometric Testing (Number Connection Test, Trails Test, etc.)

• Subject is non-azotemic (creatinine <1.5mg/dL) and ambulatory at screening.

• Subject has cirrhosis due to chronic HCV as documented by: pathologic or clinical and radiographic evidence of cirrhosis with a positive HCV RNA PCR level.

Phase A Exclusion Criteria:

• Subject has received active interferon therapy within 2 weeks of enrollment.

• Subject is pregnant or lactating.

• Subject has a life expectancy of less than 100 days.

• Subject has a history of alcohol abuse within 6 months of enrollment.

• Subject has active gastrointestinal bleeding at time of enrollment.

• Subject has used an agent that alters intestinal motility, eg, methadone, cholestyramine, tricyclic antidepressants.

• Subject is unable to take oral medication.

• Subject has used neomycin or other antibiotic within 2 weeks of enrollment or is actively using lactulose at time of enrollment.

• Subject is taking or has hypersensitivity or allergy to rifaximin or rifampin.

• Subject requires long term antibiotic therapy (eg, Lyme Disease, tuberculosis).

• Subject has known or suspected alcohol abuse or illicit drug use within 1 year of enrollment.

• Subject has participated in an investigational drug or device study within the 30 days prior to randomization.

• Subject has received rifaximin within the last 30 days.

• Subject has concomitant disease or condition that could interfere with, or for which treatment could interfere with the conduct of the study, or could in the opinion of the investigator increase the risk of AEs for the subject's participation in the study.

• Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with the study protocol for any other reason.

• Subject has been diagnosed with other forms of liver disease, including those with HIV and HBV co-infection, as determined by history, serological parameters, and histology when available.

• Subject has been diagnosed with a major psychiatric illness, chronic renal and/or respiratory insufficiency, intercurrent infections, treatment with sedatives within 7 days of enrollment.

• Subject shows presence of intestinal obstruction or inflammatory bowel disease, antacids or cathartics within the 12h before study start; antibiotics during 7 days before start of dosing; or treated with encephalopathy-causing agents.

• Subjects with bad vision or neurological diseases since they could have difficulty completing the neuropsychological assessments.

Phase B Inclusion Criteria

• Subject successfully participated in and continues to meet all eligibility criteria required in Phase A of the study based on completion of tests, Breath Tests, and Radiological Marker.

• Subject has a Number Connection Test score >50 sec at time of enrollment.

Phase B Exclusion Criteria

• A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in Phase B if (s)he meets any of the exclusion criteria for Phase A of the study.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Brain Diseases
• Hepatic Encephalopathy
• Hepatitis C
• Liver Cirrhosis

Intervention

Drug:
• Rifaximin (drug)
Rifaximin 400mg three (3) times daily

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	New York Presbyterian Hospital: Weill Medical College of Cornell University	New York	New York

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Weill Medical College of Cornell University	Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (6)

Amodio P, Del Piccolo F, Marchetti P, Angeli P, Iemmolo R, Caregaro L, Merkel C, Gerunda G, Gatta A. Clinical features and survivial of cirrhotic patients with subclinical cognitive alterations detected by the number connection test and computerized psychometric tests. Hepatology. 1999 Jun;29(6):1662-7. — View Citation

Arguedas MR, DeLawrence TG, McGuire BM. Influence of hepatic encephalopathy on health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Aug;48(8):1622-6. — View Citation

Bustamante J, Rimola A, Ventura PJ, Navasa M, Cirera I, Reggiardo V, Rodés J. Prognostic significance of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1999 May;30(5):890-5. — View Citation

Ferenci P, Lockwood A, Mullen K, Tarter R, Weissenborn K, Blei AT. Hepatic encephalopathy--definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification: final report of the working party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998. Hepatology. 2002 Mar;35(3):716-21. — View Citation

Groeneweg M, Moerland W, Quero JC, Hop WC, Krabbe PF, Schalm SW. Screening of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy. J Hepatol. 2000 May;32(5):748-53. — View Citation

Groeneweg M, Quero JC, De Bruijn I, Hartmann IJ, Essink-bot ML, Hop WC, Schalm SW. Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy impairs daily functioning. Hepatology. 1998 Jul;28(1):45-9. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Phase A: Degree of bacterial overgrowth and its correlation with the grade of hepatic encephalopathy (if present)		3 months	No
Primary	Phase B: Improvement in the psychometric scores and proportion of patients who change of HE stage		3 months	No
Secondary	Improved Intestinal transit time		3 months	No
Secondary	Improvement in bacterial overgrowth		3 months	Yes
Secondary	Improved insomnia		3 months	No
Secondary	Improved flatulence		3 months	No
Secondary	Improved quality of life.		3 months	No