Hepatic Malignancies Clinical Trial
Official title:
Role of FAPI PET/MR Combined With Gadoxetate Disodium in Assessing Hepatic Malignancies
NCT number | NCT06287411 |
Other study ID # | 202436 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | December 1, 2023 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the utility of fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) combined with gadoxetate disodium in patients with clinical suspected hepatic malignancies (lesion diameter ≤ 3.0cm), with histopathological findings obtained from biopsy or resected surgical specimens, or follow-up results as reference standards.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 36 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient = 18 years of age at the time of consent; 2. Patients with suspected, newly diagnosed, or previously treated liver cancer; 3. Estimated creatinine clearance > 30ml/min; 4. Provided written informed consent authorisation before participating in the study. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Allergic to the gadoxetate disodium; 2. MRI contraindications, not limited to cardiac implantable electronic devices and claustrophobia; 3. Weight > 90Kg; 4. Pregnancy or lactation; 5. Active inflammation may affect FAPI imaging. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Department of Nuclear Medicine, Daping Hospital of Army Medical University | Chongqing | Chongqing |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Xiao Chen |
China,
Guo W, Pang Y, Yao L, Zhao L, Fan C, Ke J, Guo P, Hao B, Fu H, Xie C, Lin Q, Wu H, Sun L, Chen H. Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus MRI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 May;48(5):1604-1617. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05095-0. Epub 2020 Nov 11. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Diagnostic performance | sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values | through study completion, an average of 2 years | |
Secondary | Quantitative parameters of PET/MR | the maximum standardized uptake value and tumour-to-background ratios | completed within one week after the PET examination |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04332419 -
Comparison of Yttrium-90 Absorbed Doses Using PET/CT Versus PET/MR Imaging for Hepatic Malignancies
|
N/A |