Hemiparesis Clinical Trial
Official title:
Understanding the Impact of Robot Assisted Therapy and Metacognitive Skills Training on Functional Performance for Children With Hemiparesis: A Pilot Study
Verified date | December 2023 |
Source | Boston Children's Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The Occupational Therapy Department at Boston Children's Hospital is teaming up with MGH Institute of Health Professions to explore the benefits of using robot assisted therapy (Amadeo) and a problem solving approach (Active Learning Program for Stroke) to achieving functional goals for children ages 7-17 years old that have hemiparesis. The hope is to help participants make gains in both hand/arm skills and progress in everyday activities such as self-care, play, school and work. Participation will look like regular therapy with sessions 3 times weekly for 8 weeks. Each visit will include time for games on the Amadeo and time spent problem solving current activity challenges for each child. Families are encouraged to participate.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 2 |
Est. completion date | January 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 7 Years to 17 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Child must be between 7 and 17 years of age at the start of the study. - Child must have hemiparesis with at least partial active grasp and release. - Child must be able to follow multi-step commands. - Child must have a caregiver available who can assist with implementation of home exercise program. - Child must speak English. - Child must have hemiparesis caused by cerebral vascular accident. - Child must have adequate insurance to cover evaluation, re-evaluations, and intervention, as this study will be billed to participants' insurance. Exclusion Criteria: - Child must not have received botulinum toxin or phenol injections within 4 months of and/or during intervention. - Child must have tone less than 3/4 on Modified Ashworth Scale. - Child must not be considered legally blind. - Child must not have contraindications for use of robot assisted device (ie. recent fracture or skin lesion). - Child must not be non-verbal. - Child must have not had reconstructive surgery to the affected upper extremity within the last year. - Child must not be receiving active oncology plan of care. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Boston Children's Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Boston Children's Hospital | MGH Institute of Health Professions |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Upper Extremity Full Version | Administered to all participants, completed by parent/guardian
Provides data for a participant's level of upper extremity function within a variety of functional tasks including ADLS, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), Education. Parent/Child questionnaire All items rated on scale of either 1-5 or 1-4, with higher scores signifying higher levels of independence. Administration time = ~15 minutes |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Other | Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) | All participants evaluated for subsections A (dissociated movements) and B (Grasps)
Provides data regarding dissociated movement and grasp patterns No formal score acquired within this study. QUEST will be used as a way to have universal language for grasp and pinch between providers. |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Other | Shriner's Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE) | Administered to all participants
Provides data regarding the spontaneous use of a hemiparetic upper extremity and the dynamic segmental alignment of the extremity while performing tasks on demand. Scores are calculated in percentiles. Spontaneous Functional Analysis items scored on scale of 0-5, with higher scores signifying more spontaneous use of the affected arm. Dynamic Positional Analysis items ranked on scale of 0-3, with higher scores signifying optimal alignment of the respective arm segment (elbow, forearm, wrist, finger, thumb). Grasp and Release Analysis items scored on scale of 0-3, with higher scores signifying optimal alignment of the wrist in grasp/release tasks. Administration time = ~15 minutes |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Other | Pain Scale | All participants evaluated
Provides data on participant's current pain level. Ranked using 0-10 numeric scale, with higher rankings signifying increased level of pain. Administration time = ~1 minute |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Other | Stereognosis Sensory Testing | All participants evaluated
Measures child's ability to perceive and recognize an object in hand. Scored in percentile correct. |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Other | Two-Point Discrimination Sensory Testing | All participants evaluated
Two-Point Discrimination - ability to discern that two nearby objects touching the skin are truly two distinct points, not one. Score in percentile correct. |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Other | Active and Passive Range of Motion | All participants evaluated for shoulder flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation, elbow flexion/extension, forearm supination/pronation, wrist flexion/extension and gross grasp/release measurements.
Measured with goniometer in degrees Administration time = ~15 minutes. |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Primary | Patient Recruitment | Quantitative tracking of patient recruitment - was the goal n of 15 children with hemiparesis who completed the study attained? | Determined at the conclusion of the study, approximately 2 years | |
Primary | Implementation of Intervention | Was the recommended frequency/duration of Amadeo and ALPS provided to participants? | Determined at the conclusion of the study, approximately 2 years | |
Primary | Implementation of Intervention | Did patients adhere to daily home programming? - At least 80% compliance will be deemed successful. | Determined at the conclusion of the study, approximately 2 years | |
Primary | Staff's Perceived Competency of Hemiparesis | Measured by a post-training survey. | Determined at the conclusion of the study, approximately 2 years | |
Primary | Staff's Actual Competency of Hemiparesis | Measured by routine audits. | Every 3 months until conclusion of the study, up to 2 years | |
Primary | Staff's Perceived Competency of Amadeo | Measured by post-training survey. | Determined at the conclusion of the study, approximately 2 years | |
Primary | Staff's Actual Competency of Amadeo | Measured by routine audits. | Every 3 months until conclusion of the study, up to 2 years | |
Primary | Staff's Actual Competency of Amadeo | Measured by fidelity checklist. | Determined at the conclusion of the study, approximately 2 years | |
Primary | Staff's Perceived Competency of ALPS | Measured by post-training survey. | Determined at the conclusion of the study, approximately 2 years | |
Primary | Staff's Actual Competency of ALPS | Measured by routine audits. | Every 3 months until conclusion of the study, up to 2 years | |
Primary | Staff's Actual Competency of ALPS | Measured by fidelity checklist. | Determined at the conclusion of the study, approximately 2 years | |
Secondary | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) | Administered to all participants. The parent/caregiver and child will collaboratively develop goal priority areas. Both the parent/caregiver and child will then separately score performance and satisfaction in each identified area so that both parent and child perception are obtained.
Provides data for participant's self-perceived performance capacity and satisfaction with performance on self-determined functional goal areas. Performance and Satisfaction are ranked on a scale of 1-10, with higher scores signifying higher self-perceived performance/satisfaction in personally identified meaningful activities. Parent/Child interview with performance/satisfaction score rankings completed Administration time = ~15 minutes |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Secondary | Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT): Activities of Daily Living and Social/Cognitive Domains | Administered to all participants. To be completed by child's parent/caregiver.
Provides data for a participant's level of independence with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) Parent/Child questionnaire Items in Activities of Daily Living and Social/Cognitive domains scored on scale of 1-4, with higher scores signifying increased ease in tasks. Administration time = ~15 minutes, can be completed prior to clinic evaluation. |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Secondary | Box & Blocks | Administered to all participants
Provides data regarding a child's gross manual dexterity Measures number of blocks transferred from one compartment to the next in 60 seconds. Administration time = ~10 minutes |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Secondary | Jebsen Hand Function Test | Administered to all participants
Provides data regarding the uni-manual skills required for ADLs. Scores are timed measurements Administration time = ~15-30 minutes |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). | |
Secondary | 9 Hole Peg Test | Administered to participants who are successful to pick up small manipulatives as part of Jebsen
Provides data regarding fine manual dexterity Scores are timed measurements. Participants will be allowed maximum 4 minutes for trial with hemiparetic upper extremity. Administration time = ~10 minutes |
Administered at week 1, week 10 of protocol (after completing 8 weeks of the intervention), and week 14 (1 month after week 10). |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT01662960 -
Visual Feedback Therapy for Treating Individuals With Hemiparesis Following Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03780296 -
Implementing Technology Enhanced Real Time Action Observation Therapy in Persons With Chronic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03605381 -
MORbidity PRevalence Estimate In StrokE
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05163210 -
Effectiveness of AOT Based on Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation.
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT04113525 -
Transcutaneous Spinal and Peripheral Stimulation and Wrist Robotic Therapy for Patients With Spastic Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01948739 -
Brain Machine Interface Control of an Robotic Exoskeleton in Training Upper Extremity Functions in Stroke
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03237520 -
Comparing Virtual Reality Therapy With Modified-CIMT Versus Modified-CIMT Alone in Hemiparetic Children
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03080454 -
The Role of Trans-spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS) in Treating Patients With Hand Spasticity After Stroke
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01651533 -
Mental Practice in Chronic, Stroke Induced Hemiparesis
|
N/A | |
Suspended |
NCT01519843 -
Post Stroke Motor Learning
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01106755 -
Effects of Ground Level Gait Training With Body Weight Support (BWS) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00170716 -
Safety and Effectiveness of Cortical Stimulation in the Treatment of Stroke Patients With Upper Extremity Hemiparesis
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04286997 -
VARA (Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Rehabilitation): Motor Rehabilitation Protocol With GRAIL for Patients Affected by Hemiparesis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05856669 -
The Effects of Mirror-Based Virtual Reality Systems and Recalibration Software on Upper Extremity Function in Individuals Experiencing Hemiparesis Post-Stroke
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05801874 -
Gait and Posture Analysis in Hemiparetic Patients Through Optoelectronic Systems, "Smart" Tools and Clinical Evaluation
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05590988 -
Sensorimotor Arm Rehabilitation After Stroke
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04536987 -
Robot Therapy for Rehabilitation of Hand Movement After Stroke
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04694833 -
Telerehabilitation Through Serious Games in Virtual Reality in a Stroke Population (AutoRReVi)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03965403 -
Upper Extremity Rehabilitation With the BURT Robotic Arm
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03638570 -
Altered Connections in the Spinal Cord to Reduce Hand Impairment After Stroke
|
N/A |