Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05916469 |
Other study ID # |
LNG-IUD BD Study |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 2024 |
Est. completion date |
June 2029 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2023 |
Source |
Oregon Health and Science University |
Contact |
OHSU Women's Health Research Unit |
Phone |
5034943666 |
Email |
whru[@]ohsu.edu |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational [Patient Registry]
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The goal of this multicenter prospective observational study and registry of U.S. adolescents
and young adults with heritable bleeding disorders is to determine the bleeding outcomes,
satisfaction, hemostatic parameter changes, and patient reported quality of life after 6
months of use of either of two commonly used hormonal treatments for menstrual suppression -
levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) and norethindrone acetate (NETA). Under this
application we will compare the two treatments and compare outcomes after LNG-IUD treatment
results to a control group without a bleeding disorder, with the goal of determining the
benefits and expected outcomes of these treatment options for this population.
Description:
Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is common among adolescents and young adults with an inherited
bleeding disorder (BD) and negatively impacts health-related quality of life and physical and
mental health status. Effective treatment options are available that decrease bleeding and
improve quality of life, but were not studied in those with BD, so we do not know if there is
similar effectiveness in this condition. We also do not know the impact of treatment on
diagnostic testing for BD or on improvement of iron deficiency. Given these gaps in
knowledge, the primary objective of the Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Progestin Treatment in
Bleeding Disorders Study is to conduct a multicenter prospective observational cohort study
and registry, enrolling adolescents and young adults with heavy menstrual bleeding cared for
at collaborating interdisciplinary menstrual clinic sites nationally who are choosing to
start use of either of two commonly used progestin menstrual treatment options:
levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUD) or oral norethindrone acetate 5 mg
daily (NETA) (N=300). In Aim 1, we will compare outcomes related to (a) bleeding management,
(b) quality of life, and (c) repletion of iron storage levels after six months of treatment
with either option in those with a diagnosed inherited bleeding disorder. The primary outcome
will be treatment success with a Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) score <50
points by six months. Secondary objectives to assess bleeding management will include need
for adjuvant management, change in PBAC from baseline to 6 months, and self-reported
treatment success. Quality of life outcomes will include change in validated scales to assess
health-related quality of life which are specific to adolescents and young adults in the
setting of heavy menstrual bleeding. We will compare ferritin levels at six months compared
to baseline to determine the relative amount of benefit obtained from either treatment
option. In Aim 2, we will compare outcomes after LNG-IUD in those with and without a bleeding
disorder, assessing rates of expulsion and method continuation between the two groups in
addition to the outcomes assessed for Aim 1. In Aim 3, we will improve our understanding of
the impact of physiological stress on BD diagnostic studies by comparing change in hemostatic
parameters before and after successful treatment in those with HMB without a previously
diagnosed bleeding disorder. This study will demonstrate the relative benefits of menstrual
suppression treatment options for adolescents and young adults with heavy menstrual bleeding
and inherited bleeding disorders, will provide population-specific estimates for expected
benefit that can be used in treatment counseling, and will highlight the impact of treatment
status on diagnostic test results.