View clinical trials related to Heat Stress Disorders.
Filter by:Allergic rhinitis (AR) currently affects ~25% of Canadians, and due to factors of climate change, this number is expected to increase over the coming decade. AR symptoms can significantly impact individuals' quality of life by compromising sleep, productivity, and social interactions. To alleviate AR symptoms, North Americans tend to rely on H1 antihistamine medications available over-the-counter (OTC) at most pharmacies. However, public health authorities currently suggest restraining all antihistamines during heat waves due to beliefs that M3 muscarinic receptor and H1 receptor antagonism, independent pharmacological mechanisms of H1 antihistamines, might suppress thermoregulatory responses to heat stress and increase individuals' susceptibility to heat-related illness/injury. To date, studies using supramaximal doses of antihistamines have demonstrated reductions in sweating, however these doses and administration routes are not the typical use case. Additional studies utilizing fexofenadine, a second-generation H1 antihistamine, have linked H1 receptor antagonism to reductions in skin blood flow, potentially impacting thermoregulation by reducing peripheral blood redistribution. Empirical evidence supporting OTC H1 antihistamines impacting thermoregulatory control at recommended doses is scarce. Thus, this study aims to systematically assess whether three common OTC H1 antihistamines, taken as prescribed, alter thermoregulatory responses during thermal stress.
The study explores a multi-component heat strain prevention program for older agricultural workers in response to climate change. It assesses hydration, rest breaks, reflective clothing, and shade provision. Utilizing a quasi-experimental design, it targets 120 elderly workers, evaluating core temperature, heart rate, and heat strain symptoms. The goal is to establish the program's effectiveness in safeguarding worker health and safety amidst increasing temperatures, offering evidence-based recommendations for this vulnerable group and potentially other occupations affected by climate change.
Three male and three female semi-professional athletes, ranging in age from 22 to 27, participated in a study that was done at Lund University in Sweden to examine their physiological responses. The temperature and relative humidity were adjusted at 40 degrees Celsius for hot, dry conditions and 31 degrees Celsius for hot, wet conditions, respectively. The participants were instructed to engage in physical activity on a treadmill within the chamber for 70 minutes, or until participants were able to continue their exercise without difficulty within the allotted period. Participants were instructed to walk (5 kph) and run (8 kph). Participants pulse rate, breathing rate, oxygen consumption, and subjective reactions were all recorded. On the basis of the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT), a heat stress index, the American College of Sports Medicine has made certain suggestions. The technique used to determine the temperature on a Celsius scale took into account the influences of relative humidity, air temperature, wind, and direct sunlight radiation. The American College of Sports Medicine advises delaying athletic competition when the WBGT is above 28 degrees. In the climate control chamber, the trials were carried out in high-risk circumstances (28 degrees Celsius WBGT). According to the study's findings, exercise is influenced by weather, and as air temperature rises, so do the intensity of exertion and thermal feeling.
Military personnel are called upon to serve in hot, dry or humid climates, which places great demands on their ability to tolerate heat. Induced heat stress can impair performance and lead to pathologies. Faced with the challenges of global warming, this issue is becoming increasingly important in the practice of sport. While hyperthermia is known to impair endurance performance, the underlying thermophysiological responses and regulatory mechanisms during prolonged exercise remain poorly understood. The effects of hyperthermia on mental performance raise questions about the degradation of interoceptive capacities and the deleterious impact on behavioral regulation, an important component of thermal risk management in ultra-endurance exercise. What's more, despite the muscular and hydromineral consequences (rhabdomyolysis, renal failure, dehydration) of prolonged exercise, few data are available on recovery kinetics. A better understanding of the factors conditioning recovery quality could help limit the deleterious consequences of ultra-endurance exercise.
Workplaces rely on upper heat stress limits provided by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) to manage the health and safety of workers in hot environments. This is primarily achieved by interspersing work with rest periods, the length of which is dictated by environmental conditions and work intensity, to maintain core temperature at or below 38.0°C (equivalent to a 1°C increase in body core temperature above resting levels). However, these guidelines employ a "one size fits all" approach to exposure limits that does not consider individual variation between workers. Moreover, they fail to provide direction on the safe, initial stay times before these heat-mitigation controls should be employed (i.e., rest breaks) in conditions exceeding upper heat stress limits. While recent work has generated estimates of the initial stay times for young to older men before heat-mitigation controls are required for moderate-intensity work, this information is limited to a single work bout and does not consider a second work bout preceded by an extended rest period (e.g., lunch) or next day effects. This is a key consideration, as prolonged work in the heat has been shown to cause next-day impairments in heat dissipation in older men. Further, it remains unclear if the application of the prescribed ACGIH work-rest allocations thereafter would alleviate increases in core temperature for the duration of the work period (e.g., start of shift versus post-lunch period). This project will address these knowledge gaps by determining if refinements in initial stay times for moderate-intensity work (represents the average work effort of physically demanding occupations) in the heat (26°C wet-bulb globe temperature) may be required for young and older adults for i) a second work bout that is preceded by an extended rest period such as a lunch break, and ii) a work bout performed on the next day. This includes assessing the efficacy of the prescribed ACGIH work-rest allocations to mitigate increases in core temperature beyond safe limits (>38.0°C, equivalent to a >1°C increase in body core temperature above resting levels) during these work periods. Given the known sex-differences in heat loss that can modulate core temperature regulation during an exercise-heat stress, the investigators will conduct separate analysis to identify modulating effects of biological sex on the initial stay times and effectiveness of the work-rest allocation as a heat-alleviation control.
The goal of this study is to collaborate with farmworker, community organizations, and labor contractors/employers to develop workplace- and individual-level interventions, and evaluate the efficacy of those interventions in decreasing physiological and perceived heat stress among Latinx farmworkers in Idaho.
Exertional heat stroke (EHS) is the most serious form of heat-illness that can occur during sports and exercise. If not recognized and treated immediately mortality rate of EHS is high. Early recognition and initiation of cooling are paramount. If temperature is reduced to < 40°C within 30 minutes of symptom onset, most patients recover completely. There are several strategies for cooling in EHS, including cooling with rotating in ice water soaked towels which cover the body of a patient. The aim of this research is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of treatment of EHS with ice water soaked towels to lower body temperature.
The purpose of this research study is to better understand ways that women and men differ physiologically, cognitively, physically, and cellularly to better prescribe helpful interventions that will prevent injury and risk of conditions like exertional heat illnesses or heatstroke. The main questions this project aims to answer are: 1. What is the relative stress contributing to performance differences between women and men during intense exercise in extremely hot and humid environments in response to exertional heat stress? 2. What is the relative contribution of responses in adipose tissue, cardiovascular tissue, gut microbiota, and musculoskeletal tissue on heat tolerance in women (vs. men) to exertional heat stress? 3. What is the impact of adding an antioxidant juice consumption regime and will it assist in enhancing performance during an acute bout of exercise-heat stress before and after heat acclimation? Subjects enrolled and approved for participation will perform: 1. a heat acclimation protocol which includes the completion of 5 days of prescribed exercise-heat exposure 2. two separate acute exercise-heat exposures for the assessment of thermotolerance and the investigation of potential enhancements in thermoregulatory performance that may occur after the completion of a 5-day heat acclimation protocol 3. a subset of subjects enrolled and approved for participation who opt in to antioxidant berry supplement consumption will either consume the active or placebo product throughout their participation.
• This study investigates and compares the within and in-between variances of the body responses to different heat stressors in a controlled lab-setting. The participants will be exposed to different heat sources while a variety of physiological heat strain reactions such as heartrate, sweat rate, and core body temperature are recorded using on- and in-body devices. For the participant monitoring during the study, medical grade devices such as a certified ECG and a swallowable sensor-pill to continuously monitor the core body temperature will be applied. A one-for-all wearable device is additionally applied for physiological validation. Further, sweat will be collected to assess (i) the local sweat rate and (ii) the appearance of different heat stress associated molecular markers in this non-invasively collectable biofluid. As a secondary aim, a model will be developed that will enable to predict the different heat stress sources out of the heat strain measurements.
The incidence and severity of hot weather and extreme heat events (heat waves) is increasing. As such, there is an urgent need to develop heat-alleviation strategies that can provide targeted protection for older adults who are at an elevated risk for heat-induced illnesses or death due to impaired body temperature and cardiovascular regulation. While air-conditioning provides the most effective protection from extreme heat, it is inaccessible for many individuals and cannot be used during power outages (e.g., heat-related rolling blackouts). Immersion of the lower limbs in cold water and/or the application of cold towels to the neck have been recommended as simple and sustainable alternatives to air-conditioning. However, empirical data to support the efficacy of these interventions for mitigating physiological strain and discomfort in older adults is lacking. To address this knowledge gap, this randomized crossover trial will evaluate the effect of lower limb immersion with and without application of cold towels to the neck on body core temperature, cardiovascular strain and autonomic function, dehydration, and thermal comfort in adults aged 65-85 years exposed to simulated heat wave conditions (38°C, 35% relative humidity) for 6 hours.