ACCLAIM - Advanced Chronic Heart Failure CLinical Assessment of Immune Modulation Therapy

Heart Failure, Congestive Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Effects of the Celacade™ System on Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00111969
• Other study ID #: 0202
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 3
• First received: May 26, 2005
• Last updated: June 28, 2006
• Start date: June 2003
• Est. completion date: November 2005

Study information

• Verified date: June 2006
• Source: Vasogen
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Food and Drug AdministrationCanada: Health CanadaGermany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical DevicesNorway: Norwegian Medicines AgencyDenmark: Danish Medicines AgencyPoland: Ministry of HealthIsrael: Israeli Health Ministry Pharmaceutical Administration
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to test the safety and efficacy of the Celacade™ system in reducing the risk of mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.

Description:

Evidence continues to accumulate on the importance of inflammation in the development and progression of heart failure (HF). The Celacade™ system may reduce chronic inflammation by stimulating the immune system’s physiological anti-inflammatory response. The ACCLAIM study is an international, approximately 2,000-patient, Phase III clinical research study designed to test the safety and efficacy of the Celacade™ system in reducing the risk of mortality and cardiovascular hospitalizations in patients with chronic systolic HF.

Other known NCT identifiers

• NCT00386295

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 2016
• Est. completion date: November 2005
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male or female aged 18 or older.

• New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II to IV.

• Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ? 30%, measured within the past six months (by any technique), unless there was a cardiovascular event that could have modified the LVEF during that period (e.g., coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], myocardial infarction [MI]). If the patient was started on a beta-blocker or biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronization therapy, or CRT), the LVEF measurement must have been at least three months after starting the therapy.

• Hospitalized for heart failure; OR, received intravenous (IV) administration of an inotropic agent (therapeutic dose for HF), human B-natriuretic peptide, or IV diuretic (minimum 40 mg of furosemide or equivalent) in a clinic, outpatient or emergency department within the past 12 months (stable for at least 2 weeks). Exceptions: patients in NYHA Class III or IV who have a LVEF of < 25%.

• On standard therapy for congestive heart failure (CHF), which must include angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) (unless contraindicated or patient is intolerant), with or without other appropriate agents. If on a beta-blocker, patient must have been on a beta-blocker for at least three months.

• No changes in active cardiac medications for heart failure during the two weeks prior to randomization.

• Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability to comply with the conditions of the protocol.

• Presence of a transplanted tissue or organ or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (or the expectation of the same within the next 12 months).

• Planned Automatic Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (AICD) or CRT within the next 12 months.

• Acute MI, or CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), AICD, or CRT within the past three months.

• Need for chronic intermittent inotropic therapy.

• Malignancy: evidence of disease within the previous five years. Exceptions: basal cell carcinoma, provided that it is neither infiltrating nor sclerosing, and carcinoma in situ of the cervix.

• Active myocarditis or early postpartum cardiomyopathy (within the first six months of delivery).

• Systemic corticosteroids, cytostatics, immunosuppressive drug therapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, cyclosporine, azathioprine, etc.), and DNA depleting or cytotoxic drugs taken within four weeks prior to study treatment.

• Pregnancy, or patients of childbearing potential not using adequate contraceptive methods.

• Porphyria.

• Allergy to sodium citrate or any “caine” type of local anesthetic.

• Previous Celacade™ treatment.

• Patient scheduled for hospice care.

• Clinically relevant abnormal findings in the clinical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), or laboratory tests at the screening assessment that would interfere with the objectives of the study or that would, in the investigator’s opinion, preclude safe completion of the study. Abnormal findings could include: known HIV infection or other immunodeficiency state, chronic active viral infection (such as hepatitis B or C), acute systemic infections (defined as patients undergoing treatment with antibiotics), gastrointestinal tract bleeding, or any severe or acute concomitant illness or injury.

• Any other medical, social, or geographical factor that would make it unlikely that the patient could comply with study procedures (e.g., alcohol abuse, lack of permanent residence, severe depression, disorientation, distant location, or a history of noncompliance).

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double-Blind, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Heart Failure
• Heart Failure, Congestive

Intervention

Device:
• Celacade™ system

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Vasogen

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Mortality
Primary	Cardiovascular hospitalization
Secondary	Clinical status
Secondary	Health-related patient quality
Secondary	Healthcare resource utilization