View clinical trials related to Heart Failure Acute.
Filter by:This is a prospective, single-center, open-label and randomized trial for evaluation of the effect of a 5-day administration of high doses of spironolactone (≥100mg daily) on diuresis, natriuresis, weight loss and levels of NT-proBNP in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are recommended as standard of care (SOC) in management of heart failure (HF) patients. However, recommended doses of MRAs (up to 50mg daily) have any impact on signs and symptoms of volume overload. Therefore, the proposed study will aim to show the impact of high doses of spironolactone to improve diuresis, natriuresis, weight loss and levels of NT-proBNP in hospitalized patients with ADHF.
Administration of loop diuretics to achieve decongestion is the current cornerstone of therapy for acute heart failure. Unfortunately, there is a lack of evidence of how to guide diuretic treatment. Recently, urinary sodium, as a response measure of diuretic response, has been proposed as a target for therapy. The hypothesis of this study is that natriuresis guided therapy in patients with acute heart failure will improve diuretic response, decongestion, and reduce length of hospital stay, as well as heart failure rehospitalisations.
"La Casa nel Parco" (CANP) Project is a multidisciplinary project funded by the European Union and Regione Piemonte aimed to explore innovative technology application in the care of older subjects. In this context, MONTEROSA is a monocentric randomized controlled open-label clinical trial evaluating the use of a telemonitoring/telemedicine (TM) suite (including a sphygmomanometer, pulse oximeter, weight scale, thermometer, glucometer, electrocardiograph) as a support to the routine clinical care of patients admitted to a Hospital at Home service for acute decompensated heart failure. The main objective of the study will be to evaluate the impact of TM on number of daily physician's visits. Secondary objectives will be to evaluate the impact of TM on number of daily nurse visits, on overall in-hospital mortality and on patient's and caregiver's quality of life.
This is a pilot randomized trial of the BAMS-HF (Balance, Aerobic capacity, Mobility and Strength in patients hospitalized for Heart Failure) Program versus usual care. The BAMS-HF Program pilot study is an initial step in eventually creating a comprehensive, patient-centered, primarily home-based rehabilitation intervention aimed at preventing worsening disability and dependence among older adults hospitalized for HF. The BAMS-HF Program will enroll patients hospitalized for HF (or with HF as an active problem during hospitalization) within the past 4 weeks and will engage patients during the vulnerable post-discharged period. The objective of this pilot study is to test the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effect of the BAMS-HF Program in older (>/= 65 years) adults hospitalized for HF. The BAMS-HF Program will begin within 4 week of hospital discharge and be administered 3 times weekly for 12 weeks in the patient's home upon discharge. Patients who are able to safely complete the program without in-person assistance will transition to telehealth (aka telerehabilitation) visits. The BAMS-HF Program is innovative because it is home-based, and will utilize rigorous, progressive exercises across multiple domains of physical function. The estimated preliminary effect size will be measured with the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), a well-validated measure that predicts incident mobility/disability and falls in the geriatric population. Aim #1: To assess the feasibility of the BAMS-HF Program by measuring 1) study enrollment rate, 2) proportion of prescribed sessions that were actually performed, 3) proportion of patients completing full baseline assessment and outcome measures Aim #2: To assess the acceptability of the BAMS-HF Program with qualitative interviews of participants in the intervention arm that will ask about their experience in the program, any aspects of the intervention they recommend changing and whether patients would recommend the program to others. Reason for declining or stopping participation in the study will also be recorded and considered in adjusting the study protocol. Aim #3: To estimate the preliminary intervention effect by investigating the difference in change in SPPB between the BAMS-HF Program arm and the usual care arm.
The readmission of Heart Failure (HF) patients for exacerbation HF within 30-day is unmet goal. The mail reason for readmission is excessive accumulation of fluid in patient's lung. According our data (1,2) around 40% of HF patient have excessive lung fluid at discharge from HF hospitalization ("unacceptable" residual congestion on discharge). In other words, around 40% patients are discharged from HF hospitalization prematurely when they are not ready to be discharged. Only 60% of HF patients are discharged from HF admission with "acceptable" level of residual pulmonary congestion (2). There are some techniques to assess "readiness" of HF patients for discharge. Pulmonary congestion (lung fluid accumulation) may be assessed non-invasively by measurement Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP), (3,4), by lung ultrasound (LUS), (5-7) and by Lung Impedance (LI) method (1,2). LUS is operator depended technique. LI and BNP techniques are most reliable methods (2) and easy to use.
The purpose of this study is to examine whether administering metolazone 60 minutes prior to furosemide increases urine output compared with administering metolazone and furosemide concomitantly. Participants will have equal chance of being assigned to each group.
The primary objective of the study is to compare efficacy of metolazone and chlorothiazide as add-on therapy in patients refractory to loop diuretics with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This will be a single-center randomized pilot study.
A single-arm study to observe NeuroTronik Cardiac Autonomic Nerve Stimulation (CANS) Therapy System hemodynamic and other physiologic effects.
STRATS-AHF (STrain for Risk Assessment and Therapeutic Strategies in patients with Acute Heart Failure) registry enrolled 4,312 patients hospitalized for acute HF from 3 tertiary university hospitals (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University Hospital, and Chungnam National University Hospital) from January 2009 through December 2016.
Nearly 80% of acute heart failure (AHF) patients admitted to the hospital are initially treated in the emergency department (ED). Once admitted, within 30 days post-discharge, 27% of patients are re-hospitalized or die. Attempts to improve outcomes with novel therapies have all failed. The evidence for existing AHF therapies are poor: No currently used AHF treatment is known to improve outcomes. ED treatment is largely the same today as 40 years ago. Congestion, such as difficulty breathing, weight gain, and leg swelling, is the primary reason why patients present to the hospital for AHF. Treating congestion is the cornerstone of AHF management. Yet half of all AHF patients leave the hospital inadequately decongested. Although it is the investigators' belief patients are often inadequately decongested in the ED, it is common teaching within emergency medicine to focus on vasodilators and avoid or minimize diuretics, especially in those patients with elevated blood pressure. This practice is largely driven by retrospective analyses or small studies suggesting vasodilators are efficacious and IV loop diuretics may be associated with harm. The evidence base to guide early ED management is poor, and the AHA/ACC guidelines provide little to no guidance for ED treatment. This reflects the lack of high quality data, a critical unmet need that the investigators will address in this study. Using clearance of LUS B-lines as the study endpoint, the investigators will study whether a diuretic intense vs. nitrate intense strategy achieves better decongestion. Although nearly two decades old, a small study of 100 patients suggested a nitrate intense strategy led to better outcomes in AHF patients with pulmonary edema when compared with a diuretic intense strategy. The investigators aim to perform a small pilot study, in hypertensive patients (SBP > 140mmHg) to test such a strategy to inform a larger, more definitive multicenter randomized trial.