View clinical trials related to Heart Arrest.
Filter by:Even in patients with successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), outcome after cardiac arrest remains poor. The overall in-hospital survival rate widely varies both worldwide and across communities, from 1 to 4 folds according to circumstances of arrest and post-resuscitation interventions. Several studies have already shown that early interventions performed after ROSC, such as treatment of the cause, targeted temperature management, optimal hemodynamic management and extra-corporeal life support in selected patients, could improve the outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients. However, the decision process regarding the allocation of these resources, in parallel with the management of patients' proxies, remains a complex challenge for physicians facing these situations. Consequently, several prediction models and scores have been developed in order to stratify the risk of unfavorable outcome and to discriminate the best candidates for post-resuscitation interventions. Overall, several scores exist, but external validation are lacking and direct comparisons are needed to assess relative interest of scoring systems. Indeed, establishing the optimal scoring system is crucial, for optimal treatment allocation and appropriate information to relatives.
This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group, double-blind, superiority trial of calcium during adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. 430 adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving at least one dose of adrenaline will be enrolled. The primary outcome is sustained return of spontaneous circulation and key secondary outcomes include survival at 30 days and survival at 30 days with a favorable neurological outcome.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the quality of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation(CPR) delivered by EMS professionals and whether this quality can be improved by implementing real-time feedback during the event and an oral post-event debriefing procedure based on the actual event performance data.
This is a prospective observational study at St. Olavs hospital in Norway. Data are gathered from defibrillators that have been in use during resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Aim is to investigate the changes in electrocardiograms (ECG) during resuscitation from pulseless electrical activity (PEA), which is a type of cardiac arrest. ECG changes may be useful as a prognostic marker during resuscitation from PEA. In addition the researchers will describe the effect of adrenaline and chest compressions on clinical state transitions during resuscitation from pulseless electrical activity. Clinical state transitions are changes between different types of cardiac arrest. This study is expected to increase our understanding of the dynamics during treatment of cardiac arrest.
Overall survival of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (*OHCA*) is less than 10% worldwide and in Taiwan. Interventions provided by the emergency medical system (*EMS*) before arrival at the hospital are of paramount importance to patient outcomes after OHCA. Among those interventions, the pros-and-cons of different vascular accesses, including intraosseous (*IO*) access or intravenous (*IV*) access, remained the issue of most under debate. The objective of this study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of IO access vs IV access in patients with OHCA by a randomized controlled trial (*RCT*) in Taipei EMS. To name in short, the investigators called it a "*VICTOR* trial" standing for "Venous Injection Compared To intraOsseous injection during Resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest".
More people are surviving a cardiac arrest due to improvements in bystander resuscitation and acute hospital care. However, many survivors of cardiac arrest are left with physical, mental and social problems impacting negatively on their quality of life. At present there are no specialist interventions for survivors of cardiac arrest in Denmark and very few have been evaluated internationally. Rehabilitation for people after cardiac events or brain injury have shown significant physical and mental well-being benefits, indicating the same may be true for survivors of cardiac arrest. This pilot study will test the feasibility and acceptability of a residential rehabilitation intervention focused on fatigue, and the physical, mental and social consequences of cardiac arrest. In addition, the pilot study will discover if the intervention has any effect on self-report measures, including fatigue, mental well-being and activity of the survivors of cardiac arrest who participate, and on the mental well-being of relatives of these survivors.
This is a clinical study based on analysis of video-clip data of endotracheal intubation (ETI) using videolaryngoscope (VL) and clinical data for cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients between 2012.03.01.-2015.02.28. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the appropriate numbers of VL usages for successful ETI at first attempt during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
PEACE study retrospectively evaluate patients who suffered an out-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and who underwent a coronary angiography, enrolled in the registry of the Province of Pavia (Italy), Ticino Region (Switzerland), Wien region (Austria) and Nicosia area (Cyprus) to comprehend the best timing for post-ROSC ECG acquisition in order to reduce the number of false positive and to select the best candidates for emergency coronary angiography.
Clear, concise, yes, and no answers can be challenging to achieve in the assessment of consciousness and breathing in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) calls. Often callers will provide an unclear response, and this can lead to hesitation on the part of the Emergency Medical Dispatcher (EMD). Further, the relatively small proportion OHCA calls represent might demand the need for simulation training in the dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) guiding itself. Therefore, the investigators investigate whether low-dose, high-frequency (LDHF) simulation-based training of EMDs can increase the quality of DA-CPR in a simulation setting. Additionally, the investigators measure whether the effect of the training will be transferred to real OHCA calls. The study is a randomised controlled trial comparing LDHF simulation-based training to standard quality improvement of the EMD in a single centre. The study protocol is structured according to the SPIRIT 2013 statement, and the study will be reported in compliance with the CONSORT 2010 Statement. The investigators chose EMDs receiving standard quality improvement as the comparator group, to reflect a representative cohort of the EMDs not exposed to the LDHF simulation-based training program. The aims of this study are: 1. To measure the effect of LDHF simulation-based training on the quality of DA-CPR in a simulation setting. 2. To measure the effect of LDHF simulation-based training on the quality of DA-CPR in real OHCA calls. The investigators hypothesise that LDHF simulation-based training will increase the quality of DA-CPR in the intervention group in a simulation setting and that this improvement is transferred to real OHCA calls - although the effect in real OHCA calls might be smaller due to the complexity of some calls. The investigators hypothesise that this improvement can be detected as a decrease in time to first bystander compression (TTFC), an increase in clarification of consciousness and breathing without asking additional questions, a decrease in time to recognition of cardiac arrest, and an increase in calls where the EMD provide DA-CPR instructions on patients in cardiac arrest.
In 2014, the authors conducted a survey of key opinion leaders on ethical resuscitation practices in 31 European Countries. The authors administered a comprehensive questionnaire to 1-2 ʺexpertsʺ from each country; subjectivity-related bias could not be excluded; however, the questionnaire was actually administered twice over a 6-month period to all participants, in order to confirm results' reproducibility. The questionnaire spanned across the following 4 domains: A: ethical practices (41 questions); B: access to best available care (39 questions); C: death diagnosis and organ donation (22 questions); and D: emergency care organization (40 questions). Accordingly, a 142-point scoring system of the responses of the participants was developed. Country-specific scores varied widely [e.g. score range of 1-41 for the ethical practices (domain A), and of 9-32 for emergency care organization (domain D)]. The authors also found a significant association between domain A and domain D scores (r2 = 0.42, P < 0.001). The results of the 2014 survey highlighted variability across European countries in their approach to the ethics of resuscitation/end-of-life care. Results also indicated the presence of substantial need for improvements in all the aforementioned domains of practice and emergency care organization On the other hand, such evolution should be substantially augmented and accelerated by the above-described combination of new guidelines, RCT-based support of ACP, legislation / governmental policies, and educational activities. With this study the authors undertake a methodologically improved version of the 2014 survey, in order to test the following hypotheses: 1) compared to 2014, there may be significant improvements in overall domain A to D scores for 2019, reflecting improved quality of ethical practice in the field of resuscitation/end-of-life care; 2) such progress, may be more marked in countries with ʺlowʺ (i.e. below-average) domain A to D scores for 2014.