View clinical trials related to Heart Arrest.
Filter by:This is a clinical study based on the analysis of video-clip data of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and clinical data for out of hospital cardiac arrest patients between 2011 and 2015. Aim of study is to compare the endotracheal intubation performance and CPR outcomes between videolaryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) users.
Cardiac arrest is one of the most stressful situations to be managed. Our first study (MAX, accepted for publication BJA) clearly showed that it could not be compared to other urgent and stressful situations (malignant hyperthermia, anaphylactic shock, acute toxicity of local anesthetics, severe and symptomatic hyperkaliemia) whose management was significantly improved with the help of a digital cognitive aid. The present study exclusively deals with the management of cardiac arrest (recovery ward, or in the delivery room.) with the second generation of our digital cognitive aid, and explores new insights on how to better manage cardiac arrest with a digital cognitive aid in the hand of the leader.
This is a clinical study based on collected video-clip data of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with suspected neck injury in multiple trauma between 2011 and 2015. The study aimed to compare all possible factors relating to ETI performance during CPR for truma patients between experienced video-laryngoscopy and direct- laryngoscopy users.
Post-resuscitation neurological impairment is associated with morbidity and especially with late mortality. Thus, because good neurological outcome is vital for a successful resuscitation, it is essential to have sufficient cerebral tissue perfusion and oxygenation during its application. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) is used to evaluate such conditions. NIRS is a non-invasive technique which provides real-time, continuous information about regional cerebral tissue oxygen saturation levels (regional SO2/rSO2). Research on NIRS has been done in many studies including cardiovascular surgery, neurosurgery and their intensive care processes and its effectiveness has been approved. However, there is limited data on its use in cardiac arrests. As stated in the current guidelines, sufficient speed and depth of chest compressions, few interruptions of compressions are key to a successful outcome of resuscitation. The studies with the mechanical chest compression devices showed that the earlier it was applied in out-of-hospital cases, the higher the rates of survival until hospitalization. There is not sufficient number of studies on the routine use of mechanical chest compression devices for in-hospital cases. In case the application of manual resuscitation is not convenient (during patient relocation, procedure at the angiography laboratory, and rush hours of emergency services when staff might fall short), alternative methods will be required. The aim of our study is to compare rSO2 levels measured during resuscitation with manual and mechanical devices in in-hospital (at the emergency department) witnessed cardiac arrest cases and to analyze the impact of both application method and perfusion levels on survival and neurological outcome.
AMSA trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled study in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. The purpose of the study is to test the hypothesis that a real time AMSA analysis during CPR may predict the success of defibrillation and optimize the timing of defibrillation delivery. The primary end-point is the efficacy of the AMSA-CPR: termination of VF/VT with achievement of ROSC for an AMSA ≥ 15.5 mV-Hz All patients meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria and receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation are randomized into two groups: AMSA-guided CPR or standard CPR. In the AMSA-CPR group, AMSA value suggests when the rescuer should deliver the defibrillation attempt; In the Standard-CPR group, the defibrillation is delivered based on the 2015 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) CPR guidelines.
The overall aim of this thesis is to identify the factors that may affect 13 year old students' acquisition of CPR skills and their willingness to act. The primary hypothesis is that the training method (intervention) influences the participants' acquisition of practical CPR skills and willingness to intervene. The study used a cluster randomized design, based on a randomization list generated by an independent statistician. The school classes were randomly assigned to different CPR training interventions. A strategic sample, where invitation to participate in the study was sent to the headmasters of all council schools, with seventh grade students, in two Swedish municipalities (140,000). Thus, the sample consists of participants with different cultural as well as socio-economic background. Eighteen of 24 schools agreed to participate. Four schools did not respond and two schools had a routine to offer CPR education only for grade nine (all six schools from the same municipality). The eighteen schools who agreed to participate consisted of sixty-eight classes with 1547 students. Prior to study participation, students and their guardians obtained a letter with study information. Study participation of the individual students was voluntary and all participants gave an oral informed consent. Inclusion criteria: seventh grade student in one of the participating schools. Exclusion criteria: student does not want to participate, student with a physical handicap that limited the physical performance, classes of students with development disabilities (these classes are age-integrated and have fewer students per class).
Survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is time critical and diminishes rapidly without appropriate intervention. Bystander CPR at least doubles the chances of survival and the additional use of a public access defibrillator (PAD) can again double overall survival rates. PADs are designed to be easy and simple to use, but whether untrained bystanders can use them safely and effectively is unknown. This study will aim to assess the ability of untrained bystanders to deploy a PAD in a simulated cardiac arrest.
Optimal chest compression depth during CPR is 4.56cm which is at variance with the current guidelines of 5.0-6.0cm. A change in guidelines is only worthwhile if healthcare professionals can accurately judge a subtle reduction in chest compression depth during CPR by a relatively small amount.
Every year, efforts are made to resuscitate about 30,000 people when their hearts stop outside of the hospital environment ('out-of-hospital cardiac arrest'). Early damage to the brain due to 'oxygen starvation' (seemingly paradoxically) gets worse when blood flow is restored. Of the 6,350 survivors admitted to intensive care units, 46% die from brain damage, and half of those who survive suffer long-term brain damage. Apart from avoiding a high temperature, nothing has been found which can protect the brain or improve outcome. 'Ketones' are chemicals naturally produced in the body from fat during starvation. They act as an energy source, but also as regulators of metabolism, and appear to protect cells from damage when oxygen supplies are scarce, or when blood flow is restored. The investigators want to see whether a ketone drink will protect the brain after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The investigators will study 10 cardiac arrest patients, and participants will be given the ketone drink via a feeding tube (which is routinely passed into the stomach in such cases). The investigators shall check that the drink is absorbed, and measure the ketone levels in the blood. The investigators will also measure important aspects of blood chemistry (including pH and blood sugar) and collect data on brain (electrical recordings called 'EEG' and 'SSEP') and heart function (ultrasound scans or 'echocardiographs') - both of which it is hoped might improve - in order to demonstrate that this is possible if it is to be included in a subsequent large trial. The study will be scrutinised by world experts in the field, who have also helped design the study. If this pilot study is a success, the investigators will apply to a major grant body to fund an appropriately-powered randomised controlled trial to determine whether ketones improve neurological outcome and survival in these patients. Results will also allow similar studies to be planned in heart attack, stroke and traumatic brain injury.
This study will evaluated the epidemiology and the outcomes of patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with presumed cardiac etiology in Korea.