Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04882527
Other study ID # 2019-01599
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 28, 2021
Est. completion date October 31, 2023

Study information

Verified date December 2023
Source University of Bern
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Prospective memory is the ability to remember to carry out intentions with a certain delay (e.g. remember to buy stamps when passing a postal office). Prospective memory tasks require a large degree of self-initiated retrieval and in the absence of a prompt to recall, people must 'remember to remember' by their own volition. Thus, prospective memory is a challenge - especially in old age with increasing health-related prospective memory demands. Previous studies reported links between neural activity in specific brain regions and prospective memory performance. Yet, the mere occurrence of a change in brain activity in concomitance with performance of a behavioral task is not sufficient to confirm a causal relationship between the two phenomena. Therefore, this study aims to apply non-invasive brain stimulation to facilitate or inhibit activity in different brain regions presumed to be functionally associated with prospective memory. Additional to the prospective memory tasks, the investigators will implement control tasks (i.e., attention) to assess whether stimulation will specifically enhance prospective memory performance or whether other cognitive functions will be modulated additionally. It is hypothesized that stimulation will lead to changes in prospective memory functioning. Further, the investigators expect that facilitation of attentional processes might be linked to prospective memory improvements.


Description:

This study aims to modulate neural activity in the left and right inferior frontal lobe as well as in the right superior parietal lobe via high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) in older adults. There is evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies that these areas are involved in prospective memory performance in younger and older adults but a causal relation between activity in these areas and responses in prospective memory tasks has not been established so far. A double blind, sham-controlled, parallel group design will be applied. Healthy older adults (n=105) will participate in two separate sessions: During the first baseline session, no stimulation is applied. For the second session, participants will then be randomly assigned to one of seven experimental groups (cathodal vs. anodal right inferior frontal lobe (rIFL); cathodal vs. anodal left inferior frontal lobe (lIFL); cathodal vs. anodal right superior parietal lobe (rSPL); or sham). Real stimulation will be applied during 20 minutes with one Milliamp (mA). In case of sham stimulation (i.e., control intervention), the electrode positions and the attachment procedures correspond to those of real tDCS but the electrical current will only be ramped up to one mA and switched off completely after 30 s of stimulation. The primary objective of this study is the modulation of prospective memory performance in a computer-based task via tDCS. Further, this study aims to clarify the role of attentional control for prospective memory performance, as both processes seem to recruit similar neural structures. Additionally, naturalistic and self-rated prospective memory performance will be assessed. It is hypothesized that stimulation of the right inferior frontal lobe will lead to changes in prospective memory performance and attentional processes. Whether cathodal or anodal stimulation will enhance performance is not clear yet, since previous fMRI studies were inconsistent about activity changes in older adults. Further, the investigators expect that anodal stimulation of the left inferior frontal cortex may lead to faster responses to prospective memory stimuli, whereas cathodal stimulation of the same area may lead to prolonged reaction times. It is hypothesized that attentional control will not be affected by stimulation of the left inferior frontal lobe. Finally, the investigators expect that anodal stimulation of the right superior parietal cortex will lead to better prospective memory and attentional control performance, whereas cathodal stimulation will have detrimental effects on both functions.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 106
Est. completion date October 31, 2023
Est. primary completion date October 31, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 60 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - No cognitive impairments - Fluent in German - Right-handed - Normal or corrected-to-normal vision - Non-smokers - Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Current/lifetime severe psychiatric or neurological disorder - Metal implants in the head area - Psychotropic medication - Dermatosis - Current/lifetime alcohol abuse - Magnetisable implants

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Non-invasive brain stimulation
Stimulation will be applied once per subject with one mA for 20 minutes over either the left inferior frontal lobe, the right inferior frontal lobe or the right superior parietal lobe.
Sham stimulation
The electrode positions and the attachment procedures correspond to those of real tDCS but the electrical current will only be ramped up to 1 mA and switched off completely after 30 s of stimulation.

Locations

Country Name City State
Switzerland Universitätsklinik für Alterspsychiatrie und Psychotherapie Bern

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Bern

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Switzerland, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Self-rated prospective memory Assessed with a questionnaire (PRMQ - Prospective Retrospective Memory Questionnaire).
Comparison to performance in other tasks.
Only at baseline session, after computer-based tasks, 10 minutes
Other Self-rated metacognitive prospective memory Assessed with a questionnaire (MPMI - Metacognitive Prospective Memory Inventory).
Comparison to performance in other tasks.
Only at stimulation session, after intervention, 10 minutes
Other Stimulation Side-Effects Self-rating about adverse side effects during and after stimulation are assessed with a questionnaire. Only at stimulation session, after intervention, 3 minutes
Other Naturalistic prospective memory Assessed with a behavioral task. Number of correctly retrieved naturalistic prospective memory intentions.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
5 minutes per session; retrieval within five days after each session
Other Inhibition intra-individual coefficient of variation Assessed with a go/no-go computer task (TAP -Test of Attentional Performance). Variability of response times (i.e., within-person fluctuation in response latency) to go-stimuli.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: directly after intervention), 2 minutes
Other Flexibility intra-individual coefficient of variation Assessed with flexibility computer task (TAP -Test of Attentional Performance). Variability of response times (i.e., within-person fluctuation in response latency).
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: directly after intervention), 3 minutes
Other Divided attention intra-individual coefficient of variation Assessed with a computer-based task (Test of Attentional Performance). Variability of response times (i.e., within-person fluctuation in response latency).
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: directly after stimulation), 3 minutes 30 seconds
Primary Prospective memory performance Assessed with a computer task. Number of correct answers given to prospective memory stimuli.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: during intervention), fixed to 14 minutes
Primary Prospective memory reaction time Assessed with a computer task. Reaction times of answers given to prospective memory stimuli.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: during intervention), fixed to 14 minutes
Primary Executive controlling functioning Assessed with a computer task (ANT - Attentional Network Task). Interference between answers given to congruent and incongruent stimuli.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: during intervention), task fixed to 6 minutes
Primary Flexibility performance Assessed with a computer task (TAP- Test of Attentional Performance). Number of correct answers.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: directly after intervention), 3 minutes
Primary Inhibition errors Assessed with a computer task (Test of Attentional Performance). Sum of incorrect responses to no-go stimuli.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: directly after intervention), 2 minutes
Primary Divided attention misses Assessed with a computer task (TAP - Test of Attentional Performance). Sum of missed target stimuli.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: directly after intervention), 3 minutes 30 seconds
Primary Flexibility reaction-time Assessed with a computer task (TAP - Test of Attentional Performance). Mean/ median of reactions times of correct responses.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: directly after intervention), 3 minutes
Primary Inhibition reaction time Assessed with a go/no-go computer task (TAP -Test of Attentional Performance). Mean/ median of reactions times to correct responses.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: directly after intervention), 2 minutes
Primary Divided attention reaction time Assessed with a computer-based task (Test of Attentional Performance). Median reaction time of correct answers.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: directly after stimulation), 3 minutes 30 seconds
Secondary Alerting network functioning Assessed with a computer task (ANT - Attentional Network Task). Contrasting reaction times of answers given to stimuli with alerting cues to those without alerting cues.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: during intervention), task fixed to 6 minutes
Secondary Orienting network functioning Assessed with a computer task (ANT - Attentional Network Task). Contrasting reaction times of answers given to stimuli with reliable spatial cues to those without spatial cues.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: during intervention), task fixed to 6 minutes
Secondary Ongoing-task performance Assessed with a computer task. Number of correctly answered ongoing task stimuli in the course of the prospective memory task.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: during intervention), fixed to 14 minutes
Secondary Ongoing-task reaction time Assessed with a computer task. Mean/median response time of correct ongoing task answers in the course of the prospective memory task.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: during intervention), fixed to 14 minutes
Secondary Ongoing-task intra-individual coefficient of variation Assessed with a computer task. Variability of response times (i.e., within-person fluctuation in response latency) to ongoing task stimuli in the course of the prospective memory task.
Change from baseline to intervention session, difference between intervention groups.
During both sessions (for stimulation session: during intervention), fixed to 14 minutes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05596474 - Effect of Beet-root Juice and PBM Treatments on Muscle Fatigue N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05203848 - Community Dance Program (CDP) for Older Adults Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT06455982 - Reduced Carbohydrates + Ketogenic Supplement on Energy Metabolism N/A
Completed NCT04084457 - Investigating the Effects of Daily Consumption of Blueberry (Poly)Phenols on Vascular Function and Cognitive Performance N/A
Recruiting NCT05006261 - A Mobile Tai Chi Platform for Fall Prevention in Older Adults - Phase II N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04262674 - Non-invasive, Wearable Multi-parameter System for the Early Prediction of Cognitive Decline and Dementia in Older Adults N/A
Completed NCT02218411 - Video-supported Group-based Otago Exercise Programme on Physical Performance in Older Adults. Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT05961319 - Smart Home Technologies for Assessing and Monitoring Frailty in Older Adults
Completed NCT05213091 - The Effect of Otago Exercises in the Elderly N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04904068 - Functional Neuroimaging in Parkinson's Disease
Completed NCT04348162 - Food Anthocyanins and Flavanols as a Strategy for a Healthy Ageing: Cardiovascular Health and Cognitive Performance N/A
Completed NCT05941143 - Effect of Mindfulness on EEG Brain Activity for Cognitive and Psychological Well-being in the Elderly N/A
Completed NCT06022094 - Effect of a Two-month Carbohydrate-restricted Diet on Energy Metabolism in a Seniors' Residence N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06162871 - Social Participation and Healthy Aging N/A
Completed NCT05207501 - Effects of Different Moderate-intensity Exercise Methods on Health in the Elderly N/A
Recruiting NCT04986787 - Novel, Individualized Brain Stimulation, Network-based Approaches to Improve Cognition N/A
Completed NCT05933798 - China Pilot of ICOPE (Integrated Care for Older People) in Chaoyang N/A
Recruiting NCT05394363 - Generation Victoria Cohort 2020s: A Statewide Longitudinal Cohort Study of Victorian Children and Their Parents
Completed NCT04786665 - Strawberries, Cognition, and Vascular Health N/A
Completed NCT05290571 - Modified Otago Exercise Program on Balance Performance N/A