View clinical trials related to Head and Neck Neoplasms.
Filter by:Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) is a common and potentially life-threatening toxicity of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). HNC survivors have a 20-24 percent lifetime risk of pneumonia after RT, which is associated with a 42 percent excess risk of death in survivorship. Moreover, dysphagia predisposes individuals to malnutrition, and at least half of HNC patients require feeding tubes during RT. Patients are commonly referred for swallowing therapy with a speech pathologist. Some patients receive early intervention, before a swallowing problem begins-PRO-ACTIVE therapy. Other patients are monitored and prescribed dysphagia interventions only if and when a swallowing problem occurs-RE-ACTIVE therapy. Thus, REACTIVE therapy aims to reverse an already impaired swallowing ability, whereas PRO-ACTIVE therapy aims to prevent or reduce severity of dysphagia. These two broad categories of therapy represent the most common types of intervention offered to HNC patients across North America. Although there is single-institution evidence to support each practice, it is yet unknown which is most effective. To address this gap, the primary aim of this international, multi-site 3-arm pragmatic randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of PRO-ACTIVE (high and low intensity) versus RE-ACTIVE swallowing therapy among 952 patients with HNC planning to undergo RT, using duration of feeding tube dependence after RT as the primary outcome. Our secondary aim proposes to compare the relative benefit or harm of these swallowing interventions on secondary outcomes considered relevant to our stakeholder partners.
The main objective of this national, open-label, non-randomized phase II trial is to evaluate severe late toxicity of postoperative hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of early stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer with high risk margins.
The purpose of this research study is to test the safety and efficacy of nivolumab after salvage resection in head and neck cancer in patients that have previously received definitive radiation with or without chemotherapy.
This phase II/III trial studies how well radiation therapy works with durvalumab or cetuximab in treating patients with head and neck cancer that has spread to a local and/or regional area of the body who cannot take cisplatin. Radiation therapy uses high energy x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab, may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Cetuximab is a monoclonal antibody that may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. It is not known if radiation therapy with durvalumab will work better than the usual therapy of radiation therapy with cetuximab in treating patients with head and neck cancer.
The purpose of this study is to test the safety of neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy as a safe means of down-staging Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) prior to surgical resection.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the tumor control and the side effects of using proton therapy for head and neck cancer that has come back.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of hypofractionated radiation therapy and concomitant chemotherapy with cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck cancer in a high volume brazilian center.
Anti-EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) therapies, namely cetuximab and panitumumab, have become standards in the management of metastatic colorectal and head and neck cancers. These therapies are used in daily practice, that requiring to manage their skin and digestive toxicities. However, anti-EGFR are also frequently responsible for hypomagnesemia often neglected and under-treated. Hypomagnesemia may manifest as asthenia, cramps, muscle weakness, mood disorders. She is often underestimated because they are difficult to identify and accountable by clinicians in the context of cancer under chemotherapy. There is currently no national or international recommendation on the management of hypomagnesaemia in oncology and medicine in general. There are, however, on the market many nutritional supplements rich in magnesium in the form of tablets or oral solution, in multiple dosages. These food supplements rich in magnesium are sold without proof of effectiveness. Moreover, the prescription of oral magnesium supplementation adds to the oncology patient an over-medicalization, which can be poorly tolerated at the digestive level, and responsible for diarrhea and a lack of compliance. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommends in its opinion on "Dietary reference values for water" to consume 2 liters for women and 2.5 liters for men every day, all sources combined (food and beverages). The drink represent 80% of the water intake, that is about 1.5 Liter per day excluding food. However, there are multiple water marketed or distributed freely, with different compositions. Thus the quantity and quality of the mineral water consumed can influence the metabolism. Rozana® mineral water, has the double advantage of being the French water the most concentrated in magnesium (160 mg / L) and of being lowly concentrated in sulphate, responsible of the laxative power of certain waters. Instead of adding magnesium supplements with a poor digestive tolerance, to patients with metastatic cancer and often with a heavy treatment , the aim of this study is to evaluate whether a change in oral hydration in quantitative and qualitative terms can decrease the rate of hypomagnesemia in patients treated with anti-EGFR.
Objectives: Primary Aim: Examine the feasibility of a dyadic yoga program in 40 Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) and their family caregivers. Secondary Aims: 1. Establish the initial efficacy of the yoga program in patients and their caregivers regarding quality of life (QOL) outcomes (i.e., fatigue, sleep disturbance, depressive symptoms, and overall QOL) and objective performance outcomes (i.e, sit to stand test and grip strength).
This is a non-randomized, phase II, open label study of apatinib mesylate tablets plus tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsules in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of apatinib mesylate tablets plus tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsules in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck