View clinical trials related to Hand Injuries.
Filter by:This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial comparing two different techniques for digital blocks. Participants will be physicians who perform digital blocks as part of their everyday duty. Each participant will undergo two digital blocks and will have the opportunity to perform a digital block on another participant. This study follows a two-period cross-over design with four groups that are defined by the sequence of treatments within each group. Participants will receive two digital blocks, one using the traditional dorsal technique and one using the volar technique. Of the two injections, one of the syringes will contain 1% lidocaine without epinephrine and the other will contain sterile normal saline. The injections will be to the index finger on each hand. The hand injected first will be up to the participant. The order in which the dorsal technique versus the volar technique is performed will be randomized. Participants will not be told one of the syringes contains normal saline. Injection pain will be measured by visual analog score and recorded after each injection. Sensation in each of the 12 zones of the finger will be recorded at each minute mark until loss of sensation in all 12 zones is achieved or 15 minutes has passed, whichever comes first.
Bier block , or intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA), is a method of anesthesia for upper extremity surgeries. IVRA was first described by August Bier in 1908, and after a period of latency, it began to gain widespread use after Holmes reemphasized its use in 1963. Bier blocks are technically easy to perform, and the rates for successful anesthesia approach 98%. Furthermore, when compared with brachial plexus blocks for outpatient hand and upper extremity surgery, IVRA may realize lower costs and faster postanesthesia recovery. Although a reliable source of anesthesia, IVRA has been associated with some disadvantages. Some patients cannot tolerate the tourniquet-mediated arm pain, and there are also reports of neurologic injury and compartment syndrome caused by the tourniquet. Perhaps the most serious complications associated with IVRA relate to the potential systemic toxicity of the local anesthetics used. If the local anesthetic gains access to a patient's systemic circulation, the central nervous system (CNS) and cardiovascular system can be affected. The CNS is usually affected first, with symptoms including dizziness, tinnitus, perioral paresthesia, and seizures. Anesthetic-induced toxicity of the cardiovascular system may manifest as hypotension, bradycardia, arrhythmias, or cardiac arrest. Historically, the tourniquet used in IVRA is left inflated for a minimum of 20 minutes. Theoretically, this allows time for the local anesthetic to bind to the tissues and, consequently, prevent a large bolus of drug from entering the systemic circulation. However, this tourniquet time appears to be arbitrary, and no safe time interval between anesthetic drug injection and tourniquet deflation has been established.
This study will be done to evaluate effect of applying LED before hand exercise on hand grip strength. Sixty male patients with subacute partial thickness burn of hand will be randomly allocated into two equal groups of 30 patients. The following equipment and tools will be used Measurement equipments: - For total active motion of fingers (TAM): Goniometer. - For hand grip strength: Hand grip dynamometer. Therapeutic equipment: Light emitting diode therapy (LED) device.
The usual treatment for stuck rings includes a variety of techniques including use of ice to reduce swelling, use of lubricants, and sometimes the use of string or ring cutters. The success rate of these techniques is variable and cutting the ring is usually reserved as a last resort. Sometimes removal of a ring can take time, and can cause some small injury to the patient. Because of this, it is important to consider other methods for ring removal. This study is looking at using a device that uses compression to reduce swelling of the finger causing the ring to be stuck. This device has been approved for use in Canada. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how effective a compression device is at removing stuck rings. The study question is: how effective is a compression device at removing stuck rings? A Compression Device (CD) is a device that uses circumferential compression to reduce swelling around a stuck ring. The device is used by placing it near, but not over-top, the offending ring, and then is inflated compressing the finger. The device is applied, and the hand elevated, for approximately five minutes. The device is then removed, and with a small amount of lubricant, the ring is removed. All patients requiring ring removal at the QEII emergency department, if a compression device can be used safely, will be asked if they would like to be included in the study and have their ring removal attempted by a compression device. Following removal attempt, the clinician will document information about the ring removal. This will include some questions regarding the patient's experience with the removal. No identifying information or personal health information will be recorded. The investigators plan to collect information about use of the compression device for a period of one year. Following this time, the data will be analyzed to determine how effective the compression device is at removing rings including statements regarding patient experience. This information will be documented in a manuscript intended for publication and may be presented at academic conferences or other continuing education events. The investigators will be measuring the success rate of ring removal with the compression device. In addition, the investigators will record information on any side effects of use of the compression device, as well as patient experience including pain and satisfaction.