View clinical trials related to Hallux Abductovalgus.
Filter by:Hallux Valgus (HV) is a lateral deviation of the big toe. HV is a deformity of the forefoot centered on the 1st radius (1st metatarsal and big toe). This deformation is characterized by: - a big toe (hallux) deviated outwards (valgus greater than 12 °) - a first metatarsal moved medially (varus) (angle M1 / M2> 10 °). We also note the existence of an exostosis formed by the apex of the angle between the 1st metatarsal deviated inwards and the big toe deported outwards. This exostosis corresponds to the head of the 1st metatarsal. In addition to the pain and the unaesthetic nature induced by this deviation, the modifications of the skeletal axes of the foot cause disorders of its function but also of the joints of the lower limb during standing, walking and running. Axis defects of the lower limbs in varum or valgum also cause deformities in the rearfoot, midfoot and forefoot. There is no non-surgical curative treatment for this deformity. Different conservative treatment options have been offered for first-line treatment, including different types of physiotherapy, wearing rigid insoles or splints. Wearing rigid insoles is indicated to "counter" the valgic pressure, thereby reducing pain and high plantar pressure, in patients with HV. Their hardness, expressed in SHORE units, must be greater than 65. By countering the valgic pressure (rearfoot and midfoot), the rigid soles make it possible to contain the development of deformation and stabilize the axis of the first spoke. The speed of hallux deformation is therefore greatly reduced if the soles are worn diligently. But there is little or no impact on the correction of the deformity, but it is stabilized as it is without rapid and major worsening. Indeed, soles with a hardness greater than or equal to 65 SHORE make it possible to avoid the valgum of the hindfoot and midfoot under load and when walking. Wearing a dynamic splint was studied in a recently published prospective randomized study conducted between 2011 and 2013. This study, concluding that the dynamic splint is not effective in reducing the angle of deformation of the HV, nevertheless shows the reduction in pain during walking and running. The limits of the study lie in the pace of wearing the splint, left to the discretion of patients, during their rest period, and in the duration of the operation, which is not precisely described.
This study will have implications for any healthcare professionals who routinely manage ingrown toenails. Although different conservative and surgical treatment have been suggested, the recurrent rate is still high ranging from 20% to 30%. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of ingrown toenail (IGTN) with flat foot, hallux abducto valgus (HAV) and hallux limitus (HL), and to provide directions for addressing biomechanical risk factors in the prevention of recurrent ingrown toenails. This was the first study to investigate the association of IGTN with flat foot, and the first study in Chinese community to investigate the association of IGTN with HAV or HL. Participants with ingrown toenails (IGTN) were recruited to this study and compared with control participants with no history of ingrown toenails. The inclusion criteria for the IGTN group were: (1) history of ingrown toenails on hallux within 1 year and (2) dorso-plantar standing view of foot x-ray taken or to be taken. The exclusion criteria for the IGTN group were: (1) paediatrics (Age<18), (2) pincer nails / fungal nails, (3) prior existence of osteoarticular surgery in the foot, (4) severe trauma that changes foot morphology, (5) uncontrolled systemic disease, (6) pre-existing neurological diseases and (7) lower limb paralysis or paresis. The inclusion criterion for the control group was dorso-plantar standing view of foot x-ray taken or to be taken. The exclusion criteria for the control group were: (1) all the exclusion criteria of IGTN group, (2) history of IGTN in his or her lifetime and (3) flatfoot / first metatarsophalangeal joint pathology as the chief complaint. The symptomatic foot (or the more symptomatic foot in the case of bilateral involvement) in the IGTN group was examined. The left or right foot of the control group was randomly selected such that the ratio of the left or the right foot in the IGTN and control group was the same. Their foot posture index-6 components, Staheli's index, radiological hallux valgus angle and active maximum dorsiflexion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint on weight-bearing were measured and compared. For dependent variables with significant correlation, a one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was carried out to determine if there was a significant difference on the combined dependent variables. For dependent variables without significant correlation, separate independent sample t-tests / welch t-tests were performed.