Gynecologic Oncology Patient Clinical Trial
Official title:
Implementation and Evaluation of Psychological Services Integration in Gynecological Oncology Clinics
| Verified date | May 2019 |
| Source | Washington University School of Medicine |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to understand the feasibility and impact of integrated psychological care in outpatient gynecologic oncology clinics with the goal of creating a new standard of care. The investigators propose an intervention study comparing patient-centered outcomes (assessed by surveys) between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care. The investigators' objectives are to learn about the process of integration of psychological care directly into outpatient gynecologic oncology clinics and the impact of such integration on patients' well-being, presentation of symptoms, psychological functioning, coping mechanisms, awareness of support services offered, and perception of quality of care. As this is a feasibility study, aims are focused on assessing patient willingness for psychological intervention in the medical office, provider willingness to have psychologist present in clinic, and impact of psychological intervention. With such data to warrant further integration and time of psychologists in medical clinics, next steps for immediate and long-term projects may include focus on high risk populations, specific disease sites, additional provider clinics, more psychologist time spent in gynecological oncology clinics, and effectiveness of interventions with higher power. The investigators hope the results will serve as preliminary data for an integrated psychosocial care model that can be implemented in other oncology clinics.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 101 |
| Est. completion date | March 26, 2019 |
| Est. primary completion date | August 29, 2018 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Aged 18 years or older - Scheduled for an appointment in a gynecologic oncology clinic at the Siteman Cancer Center at the Center for Advanced Medicine or the Women's Tumor Clinic at the Center for Outpatient Health at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Patients may or may not have a cancer diagnosis. - All gynecologic cancer types, histologic grades, primary or recurrent disease. - Patients actively undergoing treatment or close observation - Pregnant or lactating patients - Able to speak and read English - Able to consent Inclusion criteria (correlative studies only) -Patients who are undergoing pre-operative work-up for evaluation of an adnexal mass by a Washington University gynecologic oncologist. Exclusion Criteria: -Impaired by a psychiatric or cognitive disorder that limits their ability to give consent or communicate with their medical providers about symptoms (as determined by the patient's medical team) Exclusion criteria (correlative studies only) - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy - Treatment within the past month with antidepressant medications that affect serotonin physiology - Specific histology: low malignant potential tumors, non-epithelial cancer histology. - Previous cancer diagnosis within the past five years or recurrent cancer - Regular steroid use in the last month - Presence of comorbidities with known effects on the immune system (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis), congestive heart failure, pregnancy, or stroke within the past six months - Major surgery in the past month. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Washington University School of Medicine | Saint Louis | Missouri |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Washington University School of Medicine | Barnes-Jewish Hospital |
United States,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Feasibility of integrating psychosocial care by a trained psychologist into gynecologic cancer outpatient clinics as measured by patient enrollment | -Willingness to participate with integrated care as quantified by proportion of enrolled patients from the number of approached eligible patients | Completion of patient enrollment (approximately 12 months) | |
| Secondary | Provider willingness to have a psychologist present | -5 item survey about willingness to have psychologist present in clinic | 6 months after start of study enrollment | |
| Secondary | Differences in clinic visit duration with and without a psychologist present | -Clinic visit duration is defined as the time from check-in to patient discharge | Day 1 | |
| Secondary | Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient distress between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care | NCCN Distress Thermometer: picture of thermometer that states to circle the number that best describes how much distress has been experienced in the past week (10=extreme distress and 0=no distress) Next section contains categories of Practical Problems, Family Problems, Emotional Problems, Physical Problems, Spiritual/religious concerns - participant is to mark yes or no to indicate if they have had problems in the past week The distress thermometer score of 0-10 is recorded. The problem areas endorsements are tallied within each problem area. |
Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment | |
| Secondary | Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient depression between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care | PROMIS Depression & Anxiety - asks participant in the last 7 days if they have felt worthless, helpless, depressed, hopeless, fearful, lack of focus, worrying, and uneasy. Check box choices are never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five. To find the total raw score for a short form with all questions answered, sum the values of the response to each question. Never = 1, rarely = 2, sometimes = 3, often =4, always = 5. Points are added to raw score. Raw score is converted to t-score via short form conversion table. |
Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment | |
| Secondary | Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient anxiety between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care | PROMIS Depression & Anxiety - asks participant in the last 7 days if they have felt worthless, helpless, depressed, hopeless, fearful, lack of focus, worrying, and uneasy. Check box choices are never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always Point values are as follows: never =1, rarely, rarely = 2, sometimes = 3, often =4, always = 5. Points are added to raw score. Raw score is converted to t-score via short form conversion table. |
Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment | |
| Secondary | Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient quality of life between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care | Quality of life (SF-12): 12 item survey Scores are recoded to give numerical value, with some items reverse scored. Scoring is broken down into mental health and physical health subscale scores. |
Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment | |
| Secondary | Difference in psychological correlates of daily functioning as measured by patient coping mechanisms between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care | Brief COPE: 28 item survey with answers ranging from 1=I haven't been doing this at all to 4=I've been doing this a lot Scores are on tallied based on answers to 4 point likert scale. No reverse scoring. There are 14 subscales with two questions each. |
Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment | |
| Secondary | Difference in psychological correlates of perception of psychological care as measured by patient perception of Siteman Cancer Center being highly focused on their wellbeing between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care | 4 item survey Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five. To find the total raw score for a short form with all questions answered, sum the values of the response to each question. 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree |
Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment | |
| Secondary | Difference in psychological correlates of awareness of psychological care as measured by awareness of support services offered between women who receive usual care versus integrated psychological care | 4 item survey Each question has five response options ranging in value from one to five. To find the total raw score for a short form with all questions answered, sum the values of the response to each question. 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree |
Enrollment, 3 months after enrollment, and 6 months after enrollment |