View clinical trials related to Glioblastoma Multiforme.
Filter by:Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM IV WHO) is the most common, primary neoplasm of brain in the adults. Simultanously it is the most agressive one of all primary brain tumors. Despite the treatment the outcome in that group of patients is poor. In case of the optimal therapy the estimated median of survival ranges between 12 and 16 months. The present standard of treatment embraces the gross total resection with the preserved neurological functions and the posoperative management according to the Stupp's protocol (fractionated radiotherapy of 60 Gy dose and the chemotherapy with Temozolamide). Annually the incidence rate of GBM is 5/100.000 of population. According to the National Tumor Registry 2494 people went down to the malignant neoplasmatic disease of brain classified as C71 (ICD-10) in 2020. The evaluation indicates that it is 600 new patients with the diagnosis of GBM. The disease becomes the 9th cause of death among males and the 13th one among females. The peak of incidence appears in the 5th decade of life and concerns the most productive population. Routinely the management embraces the planning of the resection surgery based on the preoperative magnetic resonance investigation (MRI) with contrast. The common image of the tumor allows to put the preliminary diagnosis with the high probability rate. The GBM occurs as the enhanced tumor with the central necrosis and the circumferential brain edema visible in T2 and Flair sequences of MRI. Commonly the border of tumor becomes the line of contrast enhancement. The enhances area is the aim of surgical treatment. The lack of the preoperative enhanced area in the postoperative MRI is assumed as the gross total resection (GTR). It has been proved that the range of the resection translates into the overall survival (OS) and the progression free survival (PFS). Despite the resection classified as GTR the relapse in the operated area often occurs. It can be explained by the presence of the glioma stem cells in the surrounding neuronal tissue. They are responsible for the early relapse of GBM. Notably, it is evident that the MRI with contrast becomes the method which does not reveal the proper range of resection with the relevant sensitivity so as to extend PFS and OS. The positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the diagnostic methods having been clinically evaluated. PET assesses the metabolic demand of the neoplasm for the biochemical substrates. That methodology is commonly used in case of severity of the solid tumors. The fluorodeoxyglucose (18-FDG) is the most frequently used. However the high metabolism of glucose within the brain, particularly in the grey matter, 18-FDG has the limitation in the process of planning of the tumor resection. The higher specificity and sensitivity are elicited among the markers including aminoacids, praticularly 11-C methionine (11C-MET). Within the gliomas the higher uptake is observed than in the healthy brain. The range of the contrast enhancement in the MRI covers only 58% of the higher 11C-MET metabolism. Comparing these results with a tumor resection beyond the enhancement area, indicates the necessity of the precise assessment of the proposed method in the routine planning of the glioma resection. Current body of literature lacks in high quality research concerning that issue. The articles regarding the glioma resection beyond the GTR may be found instead. The surgery is limited to the resection of brain area with the incorrect signal in the FLAIR sequence, suspected of the presence of glioma stem cells. The described technique allows to extend PFS by for about 2 months. In that case the resection is based mainly on the FLAIR sequence which does not determine the presence of the neoplasm therein. The fusion of the MRI and the MET-PET images would allow to plan the resection so as to cover the area of incorrectly increased marker uptake.
GBM represent the most common primary brain malignancy and prognosis remains poor. The most common subtype is glioblastoma which has a 5-year survival rate of approximately 5%. Despite advances in MRI techniques, accurately determining total extent of tumor remains a challenge. The result is incomplete treatment resulting in reduced survival or overtreatment resulting in avoidable treatment related morbidity. A more accurate means of assessing tumor extent is needed to guide management to improve patient survival and quality of life.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in the surgical resection of glioblastoma (GBM). The main questions it aims to answer are: - What is the safety profile of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in terms of neurological deficit, radionecrosis, edema, headache, wound dehiscence, infection, and cerebrospinal fluid fistula? - What is the efficacy of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, cognitive function, and quality of life? Participants will undergo the following tasks and treatments: - Stereotactic biopsy and diagnosis confirmation. - Conformal hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide. - Supramarginal resection guided by 5-ALA under intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. - Maintenance temozolomide administration for 6 months. Researchers will compare the group receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy to the control group following the standard Stupp protocol to assess safety and efficacy outcomes.
The objective of this program is to provide GaM for compassionate use in patients with relapsed/refractory histologic or molecular glioblastoma who have exhausted available treatments. The population of this program is adult patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years with a diagnosis of relapsed/refractory histologic or molecular glioblastoma, according to the WHO 2021 diagnostic criteria. Molecular glioblastoma is characterized as an IDH-wildtype diffuse and astrocytic glioma in adults if there is microvascular proliferation or necrosis or TERT promoter mutation or EGFR gene amplification or +7/-10 chromosome copy number changes
The standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) treatment involves maximal resection followed by concomitant radiotherapy and temozolomide. Progression-free survival (PFS) with this treatment is only 6.9 months and relapse is inevitable. At relapse, there is no consensus regarding the optimal therapeutic strategy. The rationale behind the fact that limited chemotherapy agents are available in the treatment of malignant gliomas is related to the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which impedes drug entry to the brain. Intraarterial (IA) chemotherapy allows to circumvent this. Using IA delivery of carboplatin, can produce responses in 70% of patients for a median PFS of 5 months. Median survival from study entry was 11 months, whereas the overall survival (OS) 23 months. How can the OS and PFS be improved? By combining chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action. Study design: In this phase II trial, treatment will be offered at relapse. Surgery will be performed for cytoreduction if it is warranted, followed with a combination IA carboplatin + IA Cealyx (liposomal doxorubicin) or IA carboplatin + IA etoposide phosphate. Toxicity will be assessed according to the NCIC common toxicity criteria. Treatment will consist in either IA carboplatin (400 mg/m^2) + IA Cealyx (30 mg/m^2) or IA carboplatin (400 mg/m^2) + IA etoposide phosphate (400 mg/m^2) every 4-6 weeks (1 cycle). Up to twelve cycles will be offered. Outcome measurements: Tumor response will be evaluated using the RANO criteria by magnetic resonance imaging monthly. Primary outcome will PFS and tumor response. Secondary outcome will include median OS, toxicity, quality of life (QOL), neurocognition (NC). Putting together these data will allow to correlate clinical and radiological response to QOL and NC.
The goal of this clinical trial is To investigate the safety and efficacy of Tumor-Treating Fields (TTFields) in combined with temozolomide (TMZ) and tislelizumab in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the effectiveness of Optune® (Tumor Treating Fields) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) in China. The main question it aims to answer are: - The efficacy of Optune® as an concomitant/adjuvant to radiation therapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) alone in the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM patients. - The effectiveness of Optune® given concomitantly with RT and TMZ in newly diagnosed GBM patients, compared to RT and TMZ alone. Participants will: - Receive or not receive TTFields. - Concomitantly or adjuvantly receive TTFields.
The goal of this study is to determine the response of the study drug loratinib in treating children who are newly diagnosed high-grade glioma with a fusion in ALK or ROS1. It will also evaluate the safety of lorlatinib when given with chemotherapy or after radiation therapy.
This will be a prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study to investigate the safety and efficacy of Bevacizumab (BEV) in combination with microbubble (MB)-mediated FUS in patients with recurrent GBM. BEV represents the physician's best choice for the standard of care (SoC) in rGBM after previous treatment with surgery (if appropriate), standard radiotherapy with temozolomide chemotherapy, and with adjuvant temozolomide.
Previous evidence has indicated that resection for recurrent glioblastoma might benefit the prognosis of these patients in terms of overall survival. However, the demonstrated safety profile of this approach is contradictory in the literature and the specific benefits in distinct clinical and molecular patient subgroups remains ill-defined. The aim of this study, therefore, is to compare the effects of resection and best oncological treatment for recurrent glioblastoma as a whole and in clinically important subgroups. This study is an international, multicenter, prospective observational cohort study. Recurrent glioblastoma patients will undergo tumor resection or best oncological treatment at a 1:1 ratio as decided by the tumor board. Primary endpoints are: 1) proportion of patients with NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) deterioration at 6 weeks after surgery and 2) overall survival. Secondary endpoints are: 1) progression-free survival (PFS), 2) NIHSS deterioration at 3 months and 6 months after surgery, 3) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery, and 4) frequency and severity of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in each arm. Estimated total duration of the study is 5 years. Patient inclusion is 4 years, follow-up is 1 year. The study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee (METC Zuid-West Holland/Erasmus Medical Center; MEC-2020-0812). The results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media.