Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00436969
Other study ID # 06-OV-01
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received February 16, 2007
Last updated January 27, 2017
Start date December 2006
Est. completion date August 2011

Study information

Verified date November 2016
Source DePuy Mitek
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

A comparison of Orthovisc to corticosteroid injections in the shoulder for pain due to osteoarthritis.


Description:

This multicenter, prospective double-blinded, randomized trial will study two treatment groups. Subjects will be randomized to receive either Orthovisc or corticosteroids/anesthetic injection into the shoulder in a 2:1 schema. The trial will assess safety and efficacy of pain relief in the osteoarthritic shoulder.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 274
Est. completion date August 2011
Est. primary completion date February 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 25 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- A candidate for unilateral treatment of osteoarthritis of the shoulder

- Have failed conservative treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

- Presence of full thickness Rotator Cuff tear and/or significantly compromised rotator cuff function

- No active instability or acute dislocation episodes within the previous 12 months

- Known allergy to hyaluronate preparations

- Pregnant or breast feeding

- Is receiving prescription pain medication for conditions unrelated to the index shoulder condition

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
Orthovisc
Orthovisc injection
Drug:
Control
Celestone (betamethasone sodium phosphate and acetate) - 2 mL

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia
United States UHZ Sports Medicine Coral Gables Florida
United States CORE Orthopedics Encinitas California
United States Sierra Pacific Orthopaedic Center Medical Group Fresno California
United States Andrews Research Institute Gulf Breeze Florida
United States The Methodist Houston Texas
United States Ochsner Clinic Foundation New Orleans Louisiana
United States Insall Scott Kelly Institute New York New York
United States Shores Rheumatology St Clair Shores Michigan
United States University Orthopedics Center State College Pennsylvania
United States Madigan Army Medical Center Tacoma Washington
United States Tulsa Bone and Joint Tulsa Oklahoma
United States University of Massachusetts Merdical School - Worcester Worcester Massachusetts

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
DePuy Mitek

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score (Per Protocol) Scores are measured on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain. 6 Months
Primary Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score (As Treated) Scores are measured on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain. 6 Months
Secondary Percentage of Responders Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score (Per Protocol) Scores are measured on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain.
A responder was defined as a 20 mm or greater reduction in VAS pain score from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary Percentage of Responders Using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score (As Treated) Scores are measured on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain.
A responder was defined as a 20 mm or greater reduction in VAS pain score from baseline to 6 months.
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (Per Protocol) The difference in pain was calculated as visit score - baseline score. Scores are measured on a 100 mm visual analogy scale. Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (As Treated) Scores are measured on a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS scale ranges from 0 to 100 mm with the lower score indicating less pain and the higher score indicating greater pain.
The difference in pain was calculated as visit score - baseline score.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES) Patient Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (Per Protocol) The difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES) Patient score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The ASES was designed to provide a standard method for evaluation of the shoulder through assessment of pain and activities of daily living (ie, function). The ASES is derived from an equation that incorporates a visual analog pain scale and functional ability questions. Both components have a maximum score of 50. Pain is calculated by subtracting the visual analog score from 10 and then multiplying by 5 for a total of 50 points. The function component is calculated by adding the points and multiplying by five thirds for a maximum of 50 points. The subscores for pain and function are then added for the total score. The maximum possible total score is 100, representing less pain and greater function.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES) Patient Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (As Treated) The difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES) Patient score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The ASES was designed to provide a standard method for evaluation of the shoulder through assessment of pain and activities of daily living (ie, function). The ASES is derived from an equation that incorporates a visual analog pain scale and functional ability questions. Both components have a maximum score of 50. Pain is calculated by subtracting the visual analog score from 10 and then multiplying by 5 for a total of 50 points. The function component is calculated by adding the points and multiplying by five thirds for a maximum of 50 points. The subscores for pain and function are then added for the total score. The maximum possible total score is 100, representing less pain and greater function.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES) Patient Score Change From Baseline and 6 Months (Per Protocol) The difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES) Patient score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The ASES was designed to provide a standard method for evaluation of the shoulder through assessment of pain and activities of daily living (ie, function). The ASES is derived from an equation that incorporates a visual analog pain scale and functional ability questions. Both components have a maximum score of 50. Pain is calculated by subtracting the visual analog score from 10 and then multiplying by 5 for a total of 50 points. The function component is calculated by adding the points and multiplying by five thirds for a maximum of 50 points. The subscores for pain and function are then added for the total score. The maximum possible total score is 100, representing less pain and greater function.
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES) Patient Score Change From Baseline and 6 Months (As Treated) The difference in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Evaluation Form (ASES) Patient score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The ASES was designed to provide a standard method for evaluation of the shoulder through assessment of pain and activities of daily living (ie, function). The ASES is derived from an equation that incorporates a visual analog pain scale and functional ability questions. Both components have a maximum score of 50. Pain is calculated by subtracting the visual analog score from 10 and then multiplying by 5 for a total of 50 points. The function component is calculated by adding the points and multiplying by five thirds for a maximum of 50 points. The subscores for pain and function are then added for the total score. The maximum possible total score is 100, representing less pain and greater function.
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Total Disability Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (Per Protocol) The difference in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Total Disability score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain, where: 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use, where: 0 = no difficulty and 10 = so difficult it requires help.
Scoring instructions: The scores from both dimensions are averaged to derive a total score.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Total Disability Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (As Treated) The difference in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Total Disability score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain, where: 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use, where: 0 = no difficulty and 10 = so difficult it requires help.
Scoring instructions: The scores from both dimensions are averaged to derive a total score.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Total Disability Score Change From Baseline and 6 Months (Per Protocol) The difference in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Total Disability score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain, where: 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use, where: 0 = no difficulty and 10 = so difficult it requires help.
Scoring instructions: The scores from both dimensions are averaged to derive a total score.
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Total Disability Score Change From Baseline and 6 Months (As Treated) The difference in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Total Disability score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a self-administered questionnaire that consists of two dimensions, one for pain and the other for functional activities. The pain dimension consists of five questions regarding the severity of an individual's pain, where: 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable. Functional activities are assessed with eight questions designed to measure the degree of difficulty an individual has with various activities of daily living that require upper-extremity use, where: 0 = no difficulty and 10 = so difficult it requires help.
Scoring instructions: The scores from both dimensions are averaged to derive a total score.
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (Per Protocol) The difference in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The SF-12 is a generic measure and does not target a specific age or disease group. It has been developed to provide a shorter, yet valid alternative to the SF-36, which has been seen by many health researchers as too long to administer to studies with large samples. The SF-12 is weighted and summed to provide easily interpretable scales for physical and mental health.
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (As Treated) The difference in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The SF-12 is a generic measure and does not target a specific age or disease group. It has been developed to provide a shorter, yet valid alternative to the SF-36, which has been seen by many health researchers as too long to administer to studies with large samples. The SF-12 is weighted and summed to provide easily interpretable scales for physical and mental health.
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Score Change From Baseline and 6 Months (Per Protocol) The difference in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The SF-12 is a generic measure and does not target a specific age or disease group. It has been developed to provide a shorter, yet valid alternative to the SF-36, which has been seen by many health researchers as too long to administer to studies with large samples. The SF-12 is weighted and summed to provide easily interpretable scales for physical and mental health.
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical Score Change From Baseline and 6 Months (As Treated) The difference in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Physical score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The SF-12 is a generic measure and does not target a specific age or disease group. It has been developed to provide a shorter, yet valid alternative to the SF-36, which has been seen by many health researchers as too long to administer to studies with large samples. The SF-12 is weighted and summed to provide easily interpretable scales for physical and mental health.
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Mental Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (Per Protocol) The difference in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Mental score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The SF-12 is a generic measure and does not target a specific age or disease group. It has been developed to provide a shorter, yet valid alternative to the SF-36, which has been seen by many health researchers as too long to administer to studies with large samples. The SF-12 is weighted and summed to provide easily interpretable scales for physical and mental health.
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Mental Score Change From Baseline and 12 Weeks (As Treated) The difference in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Mental score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The SF-12 is a generic measure and does not target a specific age or disease group. It has been developed to provide a shorter, yet valid alternative to the SF-36, which has been seen by many health researchers as too long to administer to studies with large samples. The SF-12 is weighted and summed to provide easily interpretable scales for physical and mental health.
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Mental Score Change From Baseline and 6 Months (Per Protocol) The difference in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Mental score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The SF-12 is a generic measure and does not target a specific age or disease group. It has been developed to provide a shorter, yet valid alternative to the SF-36, which has been seen by many health researchers as too long to administer to studies with large samples. The SF-12 is weighted and summed to provide easily interpretable scales for physical and mental health.
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Mental Score Change From Baseline and 6 Months (As Treated) The difference in 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) Mental score calculated as visit score - baseline score.
The SF-12 is a generic measure and does not target a specific age or disease group. It has been developed to provide a shorter, yet valid alternative to the SF-36, which has been seen by many health researchers as too long to administer to studies with large samples. The SF-12 is weighted and summed to provide easily interpretable scales for physical and mental health.
Physical and Mental Health Composite Scores (PCS & MCS) are computed using the scores of twelve questions and range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health measured by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health.
Baseline and 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT01726972 - A Retrospective Review of FloSeal Use in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Completed NCT06043544 - Hymovis® Intra-articular Injections vs Corticosteroids Intra-articular Injections in Patients Affected by Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis: Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05847062 - Clinical Trial to Analyze Lateralized Models and Medializations of Inverted Arthroplasty. N/A
Recruiting NCT04105478 - Comparison of Stemless and Stemmed Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT03866330 - Wharton's Jelly-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Osteoarthritis Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04845074 - Prosthesis Versus Active Exercise Program in Patients With Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis N/A
Terminated NCT03586687 - Osteoarthritis Shoulder Injection Study Phase 4
Completed NCT03379545 - 3D MR Versus 3D CT for Glenohumeral Arthritis N/A
Recruiting NCT06269705 - ZILRETTA in Subjects With Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT06171542 - Efficacy of a Single Image Guided Injection of CTM for Glenohumeral Arthritis Phase 1
Recruiting NCT03869229 - Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Osteoarthritis Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT00500630 - Objective Evaluation of Shoulder Pathology and Surgery N/A