Clinical Trials Logo

Glenohumeral Arthritis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Glenohumeral Arthritis.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04309344 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Glenohumeral Arthritis

Biological Effects of a Bipolar Radiofrequency-based Device Over Shoulder Cartilage

Alexsen
Start date: November 19, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In the non-weight bearing glenohumeral joint, focal chondral defects are encountered infrequently and are usually found in association with other pathologies, such as glenohumeral instability, postoperative chondrolysis, focal osteonecrosis, septic arthritis, osteochondritis dissecans, and rotator cuff tears. Several studies revealed that approximately one-third of patients with rotator cuff disease have concomitant articular cartilage lesions. Because the glenohumeral articular cartilage is one of the thinnest in the body, the overall accuracy of non-contrast MRI in detecting glenohumeral articular cartilage lesions is moderate and it is difficult to have an accurate characterization of a lesion my MRI. So, currently, arthroscopy is considered the ''gold standard'' for glenohumeral cartilage assessment. Even if the literature lacks high-quality evidence regarding the nonsurgical and surgical treatment options for patients with shoulder chondral defects, in these scenarios, where, in our experience, the most of the lesions are small, diffuse and of ICRS grade 2 or 3 (non-full thickness), arthroscopic debridement is a good option for addressing glenohumeral chondropathy. The main drawbacks with this type of procedure are the removal of underlying healthy cartilage and the potential lack of chondral surface smoothing. Alternatives used to perform arthroscopic chondral debridement is thermal application, carried out by the use of laser devices or the application of monopolar or bipolar radiofrequency (RF). As regards the glenohumeral joint, there are several studies that underlined the potential benefit of arthroscopic debridement in glenohumeral chondropathy and early stage of osteoarthritis, but the type of debridement used in all these studies was mechanical or not specified. Because recent studies showed that Compared to conventional MD, 50° RF treatment appears to be a superior method based on short- and medium-term clinical outcomes and the progression of knee osteoarthritis [11], we want to specifically evaluate the effects of RF in patients with grade II or III chondropathy found during arthroscopy for rotator cuff disorders.

NCT ID: NCT03958227 Completed - Clinical trials for Glenohumeral Arthritis

Investigation The Efficacy of Manual Therapy and Exercise in Patients With Glenohumeral Arthritis

Start date: May 20, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the investigator's study is to compare the efficacy of manual therapy and exercise practices compared to exercise practice in patients with Glenohumeral Arthritis. Thirty volunteer patients will include into the study.

NCT ID: NCT03219983 Terminated - Clinical trials for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Pain Management After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Start date: November 2016
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the study is to determine if pain management after total shoulder arthroplasty is more efficacious with ultrasound guided, continuous Interscalene block or with local tissue infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine. Traditionally, general anesthesia followed by narcotics has been the primary management of pain control. However, regional anesthesia in the form of an interscalene block (ISB), a perineural local anesthetic infusion, is commonly used and may more effectively control pain during and after shoulder arthroplasty, with fewer side effects than narcotics. Intraoperative benefits include better control of blood pressure and reduced need for general anesthesia and narcotics. Depending on the type of block (single shot vs. continuous) and the type of local anesthetic administered, pain relief may persist for 12-96 hours postoperatively. However, not all patients are candidates for peripheral nerve blocks. Pre-existing pulmonary disease, previous neck surgery, cervical arthritis, neurologic disorders and obesity may preclude ISB placement. As well, interscalene blocks are not completely benign procedures. Systemic complications include clinically significant intraoperative hypotension, pneumothorax, vascular injury, cardiac arrest, respiratory failure, seizure and death. Phrenic nerve paralysis is common, although transient. Peripheral nerve injuries related to mechanical injury, medication neurotoxicity, compression or ischemia are infrequent but may be devastating. The experience and number of blocks performed by the anesthesiologist in addition to adjunctive tools, such as ultrasound and/or nerve stimulators, impacts the success of the procedure. Continuous indwelling interscalene blocks (CISB) may provide substantial and longer pain relief, precluding the need for perioperative narcotics. Earlier discharge post procedure and better early range of motion are other purported benefits. However, premature catheter failure, catheter breakage, infection, over administration of medication and extended diaphragmatic paresis are concerns. In addition, there is a cost associated with these procedures. The anesthesiologist fee, catheter with or without elastomeric pump, local anesthetic, perioperative patient evaluation and treatment of any associated complications all must be considered. . The development of new, long acting local anesthetics, such as liposomal bupivacaine, is potentially important in the management of perioperative pain. Liposomal bupivacaine has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for local infiltration for pain relief after bunionectomy and hemorrhoidectomy. This preparation increases the duration of local anesthetic action by slow release from the liposome and delays the peak plasma concentration when compared to plain bupivacaine administration. Studies have shown it to be an effective tool for postoperative pain relief with opioid sparing effects and it has also been found to have an acceptable adverse effect profile.

NCT ID: NCT00765037 Completed - Clinical trials for Glenohumeral Arthritis

Retrospective Encore Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis Study

Start date: August 2008
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the survivorship and efficacy of the Encore Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis in a group of no more than 50 subjects for whom data collection has already begun.