Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04454138
Other study ID # 955
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date June 25, 2019
Est. completion date April 20, 2020

Study information

Verified date August 2020
Source Prism Eye Institute
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The Xen-45 gelatin microstent is a novel, bleb-forming microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Despite demonstrating similar efficacy and safety to trabeculectomy (traditional surgery), the Xen-45 gelatin microstent continues to suffer from occasional surgical failure due to fibrosis of the filtering bleb, and obstruction of the stent. During surgery, placement in a surgery known as supra-tenon's space is believed to maximize aqueous outflow, while preventing obstruction, limiting fibrosis of the bleb, and promoting long-term patency. Despite the theoretical merits, long-term data of outcomes after targeted supra-tenon's placement is needed to fully assess its potential in improving Xen-45 microstent outcomes.


Description:

The Xen-45 gelatin microstent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) is a novel, bleb-forming microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). Creation of a filtering bleb through the gel stent and under the conjunctiva lowers intraocular pressure (IOP) by bypassing the natural outflow pathway of aqueous. A recent retrospective cohort study showed comparable safety and risk of failure to trabeculectomy. Amongst the main advantages of this device is the ability to create a bleb without dissecting and disrupting tissue, thus decreasing the amount of wound healing and potentially limiting bleb failure. However, despite demonstrating similar efficacy and safety to trabeculectomy,2 the Xen-45 gelatin microstent continues to suffer from occasional surgical failure due to fibrosis of the filtering bleb, and obstruction of the stent. Although antimetabolites, such as mitomycin C, have decreased reactionary wound healing that can result following surgery, fibrosis may still occur, especially when the components of the Xen-45 gelatin microstent are in close proximity to the fibroblastic structures of tenon's fascia.Tenon's capsule resembles a sponge-like layer with multiple adhesions to the overlying conjunctiva and underlying episclera. Implantation of the XEN within this space creates a higher risk of obstruction and subsequent failure. To ensure the lowest potential for occlusion, bleb scarring, and failure, one must ensure careful placement of the device in the subconjunctival space, avoiding intra-tenon's placement. Placement in the supra-tenon's space is believed to maximize aqueous outflow, while preventing obstruction, limiting fibrosis of the bleb, and promoting long-term patency. Despite the theoretical merits, long-term data of outcomes after targeted supra-tenon's placement is needed to fully assess its potential in improving Xen-45 microstent outcomes.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 142
Est. completion date April 20, 2020
Est. primary completion date April 20, 2020
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 30 Years to 90 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients aged 30-90 with primary or pigmentary/pseudoexfolliative open angle, primary closed angle, or combined mechanism glaucoma with IOP of 18-40 mmHg on maximum tolerated medical therapy who received a gelatin stent with MMC at Prism Eye Institute from June 2012 to August 2019.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Other forms of glaucoma

- Prior incisional glaucoma surgery

- CPC

- Prior corneal graft (PKP, DALK, DSAEK, DMEK).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Device:
XEN-45 gelatin microstent
Placement either in the subconjunctival space or supratenon's area

Locations

Country Name City State
Canada Prism Eye Institute Oakville Ontario

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Prism Eye Institute Allergan

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Canada, 

References & Publications (4)

Conlon R, Saheb H, Ahmed II. Glaucoma treatment trends: a review. Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;52(1):114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Nov 17. Review. — View Citation

Fea AM, Spinetta R, Cannizzo PML, Consolandi G, Lavia C, Aragno V, Germinetti F, Rolle T. Evaluation of Bleb Morphology and Reduction in IOP and Glaucoma Medication following Implantation of a Novel Gel Stent. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:9364910. doi: 10.1155/2017/9364910. Epub 2017 Jun 20. — View Citation

Schlenker MB, Gulamhusein H, Conrad-Hengerer I, Somers A, Lenzhofer M, Stalmans I, Reitsamer H, Hengerer FH, Ahmed IIK. Efficacy, Safety, and Risk Factors for Failure of Standalone Ab Interno Gelatin Microstent Implantation versus Standalone Trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 2017 Nov;124(11):1579-1588. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 7. Erratum in: Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):463. — View Citation

Sng CC, Wang J, Hau S, Htoon HM, Barton K. XEN-45 collagen implant for the treatment of uveitic glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 May;46(4):339-345. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13087. Epub 2017 Nov 29. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement. Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of =6 and =14 (mmHg) on no medications Post op year 1
Primary Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 2. Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of =6 and =14 (mmHg) +/- Medications Post op Year 1
Primary Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 3. Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of =6 and =17 (mmHg) on no medications Post op year 1
Primary Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 4. Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of =6 and =17 (mmHg) +/- medication Post op Year 1
Primary Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 5. Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of =6 and =21 (mmHg) on no medications Post op Year 1
Primary Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Changes Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Nontargeted Placement 6. Mean change in IOP from baseline, IOP thresholds of =6 and =14 (mmHg) +/- medications Post op year 1
Secondary Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement. Presence or absence of the following complications:
i. Starting after POM1: shallow AC w/ iridocorneal touch, any hyphema, corneal edema, wound leak/dehiscience, choroidal effusion, malignant glaucoma, dellen/non-healing epithelial defect, ptosis, diplopia.
ii. At any point: additional glaucoma surgery, loss of light perception vision, vitreous hemorrhage, =2mm hyphema, hypotony maculopathy, implant migration/blockage/exposure/extrusion, macular edema, choroidal effusion/hemorrhage requiring drainage, suprachoroidal hemorrhage, retinal detachment, suture abscess/blebitis/endophthalmitis
Post op year 1
Secondary Number of Participants With Postoperative Interventions Between Targeted Supratenon's Placement of XEN-45 Gelatin Stent and Non-targeted Placement. Presence or absence of the following management interventions (not considered complications): bleb needling, AC reformation, suture release, digital ocular compression, use of glaucoma medications, or laser/tpa to blocked ostomy or lumen. Post op year 1
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06000865 - Glaucoma Rehabilitation With Action viDeo Games and Exercise - GRADE N/A
Recruiting NCT06278597 - Automatic Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Angle Width by a New Non-contact Optical Device N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04271709 - Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT) N/A
Recruiting NCT03274024 - The Asia Primary Tube Versus Trab (TVT) Study N/A
Completed NCT04552964 - Assessment of the Impact of an add-on and Its Smartphone Application on the Daily Management of Glaucoma N/A
Recruiting NCT01957267 - Functional and Structural Imaging for Glaucoma
Active, not recruiting NCT04624698 - iStent Inject New Enrollment Post-Approval Study N/A
Completed NCT04020705 - The Efficacy of Citicoline in Eyedrops (OMK1) in Reducing the Progression of Glaucoma N/A
Completed NCT03150160 - Additive Effect of Twice-daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2%Combination as an Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05581498 - Glaucoma Exercise as Medicine Study (GEMS). N/A
Recruiting NCT02921568 - Side-by-Side Comparison of P200TE and Spectral OCT/SLO on Diseased Eyes N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02901730 - Clinical Study of LPI With Different Laser Wavelengths N/A
Completed NCT02955849 - A Trial of China Laser and Surgery Study Glaucoma in Rural China Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02554214 - Pilot Clinical Trial on a New Adjustable Glaucoma Drainage Device N/A
Recruiting NCT02471105 - Investigation of IOP and Tolerability of Bimatoprost 0.01% and Tafluprost Unit Dose Preservative Free 15 Microgram/ml Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT02390284 - Stop Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction Study Phase 3
Completed NCT02246764 - Study of Netarsudil (AR-13324) Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Phase 3
Completed NCT02520674 - Glaucoma Screening With Smartphone Ophthalmology N/A
Completed NCT02390245 - Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study N/A
Completed NCT02628223 - 180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma N/A