Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02901730
Other study ID # [2016]102-2
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received September 11, 2016
Last updated September 11, 2016
Start date September 2016
Est. completion date December 2017

Study information

Verified date September 2016
Source First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority China: Health and Family Planning Commission of Fujian Province
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Glaucoma is the second cause of blindness worldwide. Laser peripheral iridoplasty (LPI) is a simple and effective treatment for angle closure glaucoma. LPI can widen or reopen an existing angle close or angle adhesion in order to reduce the risk of attack of the angle closure glaucoma. However, there are very little research on the laser site, laser wavelengths, laser energy and laser spot intervals. The purpose of this study is to determine the optimum laser wavelengths of LPI.


Description:

Glaucoma is the second cause of blindness worldwide. Laser peripheral iridoplasty (LPI) is a simple and effective treatment for angle closure glaucoma. LPI can widen or reopen an existing angle close or angle adhesion in order to reduce the risk of attack of the angle closure glaucoma. However, there are very little research on the laser site, laser wavelengths, laser energy and laser spot intervals.Conventional LPI uses wavelength 532nm laser. However, our preclinical studies have found that the laser penetration of the laser wavelength 561nm is stronger than that of the laser wavelength 532nm. It can produce a stronger contraction effect.

The purpose of this study is to determine the optimum laser wavelengths of LPI. Baseline and 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI, the structure of anterior chamber, including angle anterior chamber depth(ACD), angle of anterior chamber (AA), anterior chamber angle opening distance 750(AOD750) are measured with ultrasound biomicroscopy. Baseline and 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI, the outflow resistance of aqueous humor are evaluated with C value. Baseline and 1hour, 1days, 3day, 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI, intraocular pressure are measured with Goldmann tonometry. Baseline and 3 months after LPI, retinal nerve layer thickness and the optic disc cup disc ratio are measure with optical coherence tomography.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 30
Est. completion date December 2017
Est. primary completion date December 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 30 Years to 65 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with primary angle closure suspect (PACS), primary angle closure (PAC) or primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG).

- PACS is diagnosed in eyes with an occludable angle but no other abnormality.

- PAC is diagnosed in eyes with an occludable angle, normal optic discs and visual fields and any of the following: raised IOP (>19 mm Hg), PAS, pigment smearing in the superior angle, or sequelae of acute angle closure (iris whirling or glaucomatous fleck).

- PACG is diagnosed in eyes with an occludable angle and glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Evidence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy is defined as a cup: disc ratio (CDR) of >0.7 or >0.2 CDR asymmetry.

- An occludable angle is defined as one in which three quarters of the posterior pigmented trabecular meshwork is not visible on viewing with a Goldmann two mirror lens in the primary position of gaze without indentation.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients with previous ocular surgery, and those with secondary angle closure, such as lens intumescence or subluxation, iris neovascularisation and a history of uveitis.

- Patients who have systemic contraindications to medical therapy (including renal impairment, sulfur allergy, asthma and heart failure), pre-existing corneal opacities obstructing laser access to more than one quadrant of the peripheral iris and single-eyed patients are also excluded.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
532nm laser group
LPI with 532nm laser.
561nm laser group
LPI with 561nm laser.

Locations

Country Name City State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University

References & Publications (8)

Fu J, Qing GP, Wang NL, Wang HZ. Efficacy of laser peripheral iridoplasty and iridotomy on medically refractory patients with acute primary angle closure: a three year outcome. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013 Jan;126(1):41-5. — View Citation

Lai J, Choy BN, Shum JW. Management of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016 Jan-Feb;5(1):59-62. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000180. — View Citation

Lee JR, Choi JY, Kim YD, Choi J. Laser peripheral iridotomy with iridoplasty in primary angle closure suspect: anterior chamber analysis by pentacam. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;25(4):252-6. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2011.25.4.252. Epub 2011 Jul 22. — View Citation

Marchini G, Chemello F, Berzaghi D, Zampieri A. New findings in the diagnosis and treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:191-212. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 30. — View Citation

Mochizuki H, Takenaka J, Sugimoto Y, Takamatsu M, Kiuchi Y. Comparison of the prevalence of plateau iris configurations between angle-closure glaucoma and open-angle glaucoma using ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Glaucoma. 2011 Jun-Jul;20(5):315-8. doi: 10.10 — View Citation

Narayanaswamy A, Baskaran M, Perera SA, Nongpiur ME, Htoon HM, Tun TA, Wong TT, Goh D, Su DH, Chew PT, Ho CL, Aung T. Argon Laser Peripheral Iridoplasty for Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016 Mar;123(3):514- — View Citation

Sng CC, Aquino MC, Liao J, Zheng C, Ang M, Chew PT. Anterior segment morphology after acute primary angle closure treatment: a randomised study comparing iridoplasty and medical therapy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;100(4):542-8. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-20 — View Citation

Wright C, Tawfik MA, Waisbourd M, Katz LJ. Primary angle-closure glaucoma: an update. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 May;94(3):217-25. doi: 10.1111/aos.12784. Epub 2015 Jun 27. Review. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change of anterior chamber angle(AA) Anterior chamber angle (AA) is measured with ultrasound biomicroscopy. Baseline and 3 months after LPI. Yes
Secondary Change of anterior chamber angle opening distance 750(AOD750) Anterior chamber angle opening distance 750(AOD750) is measured with ultrasound biomicroscopy. Baseline and 3 months after LPI. Yes
Secondary Change of anterior chamber depth(ACD) Anterior chamber depth(ACD) is measured with ultrasound biomicroscopy. Baseline and 3 months after LPI. Yes
Secondary Change of intraocular pressure (IOP) IOP is measured with Goldmann tonometry. Baseline and 1hour, 1days, 3day, 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI. Yes
Secondary Change of C value IOP is measured with Schftz tonometry. Baseline and 7days, 1 month, 3 months after LPI. Yes
Secondary Change of retinal nerve layer thickness Retinal nerve layer thickness is measured with optical coherence tomography. Baseline and 3 months after LPI. Yes
Secondary Change of optic disc cup disc ratio Optic disc cup disc ratio is measured with optical coherence tomography. Baseline and 3 months after LPI. Yes
Secondary Change of mean defect Mean defect is measured with computer perimetry. Baseline and 3 months after LPI. Yes
Secondary Change of mean sensitivity Mean sensitivity is measured with computer perimetry. Baseline and 3 months after LPI. Yes
Secondary Change of scotoma Scotoma is measured with computer perimetry. Baseline and 3 months after LPI. Yes
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06000865 - Glaucoma Rehabilitation With Action viDeo Games and Exercise - GRADE N/A
Recruiting NCT06278597 - Automatic Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Angle Width by a New Non-contact Optical Device N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04271709 - Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT) N/A
Recruiting NCT03274024 - The Asia Primary Tube Versus Trab (TVT) Study N/A
Completed NCT04552964 - Assessment of the Impact of an add-on and Its Smartphone Application on the Daily Management of Glaucoma N/A
Recruiting NCT01957267 - Functional and Structural Imaging for Glaucoma
Active, not recruiting NCT04624698 - iStent Inject New Enrollment Post-Approval Study N/A
Completed NCT04020705 - The Efficacy of Citicoline in Eyedrops (OMK1) in Reducing the Progression of Glaucoma N/A
Completed NCT03150160 - Additive Effect of Twice-daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2%Combination as an Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05581498 - Glaucoma Exercise as Medicine Study (GEMS). N/A
Recruiting NCT02921568 - Side-by-Side Comparison of P200TE and Spectral OCT/SLO on Diseased Eyes N/A
Completed NCT02955849 - A Trial of China Laser and Surgery Study Glaucoma in Rural China Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02471105 - Investigation of IOP and Tolerability of Bimatoprost 0.01% and Tafluprost Unit Dose Preservative Free 15 Microgram/ml Phase 4
Recruiting NCT02554214 - Pilot Clinical Trial on a New Adjustable Glaucoma Drainage Device N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02390284 - Stop Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction Study Phase 3
Completed NCT02628223 - 180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma N/A
Completed NCT02390245 - Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study N/A
Completed NCT02246764 - Study of Netarsudil (AR-13324) Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Phase 3
Completed NCT02520674 - Glaucoma Screening With Smartphone Ophthalmology N/A
Completed NCT02653963 - Triamcinolone for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve N/A