Glaucoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
EFFECTS OF IMMEDIATE ARGON LASER PERIPHERAL IRIDOPLASTY Versus CONVENTIONAL SYSTEMIC MEDICAL THERAPY ON OPTIC NERVE HEAD STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION OF ACUTE PRIMARY ANGLE CLOSURE EYES
The aim is to determine which approach, immediate argon laser peripheral iridoplasty or conventional systemic medical treatment efficiently breaks acute angle closure attack without consequent visual morbidities. The specific objectives are to see whether sudden intraocular pressure(IOP) lowering brought about by laser iridoplasty or medical treatment affects optic nerve head structure and function and identify if immediate decompression is associated with greater incidence of ocular problems like corneal endothelial compromise, optic disc edema, macular edema, decompression retinopathy, cataract formation, progression to chronic angle closure.
Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (PACG) continues to be a major concern in Asia. It is a major
cause of visual morbidity in the region1 being the most prevalent type of glaucoma
especially in Chinese and Mongoloid descent.2,3 During the acute stage of the disease,
prompt institution of measures to break the attack is necessary. Two recognized approaches
are utilized in practice in lowering intraocular pressure and preparing for the definitive
treatment of laser peripheral iridotomy. These are conventional topical and systemic medical
therapy and immediate peripheral iridoplasty using either argon or diode lasers.
In the study of Lim, Tan, Chew, Seah et al., laser iridoplasty was noted to have a useful
role in the management of medically unresponsive acute angle closure, particularly in those
cases where laser peripheral iridotomy (PI) could not be successfully performed4 .
Randomized controlled trials of Lam, Lai, Tham et al. comparing immediate laser peripheral
iridoplasty plus topical medications and topical and systemic medical treatment found no
significant difference in the eventual mean IOP and requirement for glaucoma medications 5 .
However, significant difference in efficacy was observed between the two treatment arms
within the first two hours of treatment with argon laser peripheral iridoplasty and topical
medications lowering IOP faster than conventional medications6. In all the trials cited,
there was no mention of sudden IOP lowering effects of either argon laser iridoplasty or
conventional medications on the optic nerve head and visual field status, as well as its
effect on other ocular structures like the cornea, lens and retina . In our literature
search, two papers studied the optic nerve head structure and function in angle closure
glaucoma, but not in the immediate period of sudden IOP lowering. Ang, Aung, Chua, Yip and
Chew made a comparative assessment of the visual field loss between symptomatic and
asymptomatic PACG, with 50% of asymptomatic PACG subjects presenting with end stage visual
field loss in contrast to just 7% of symptomatic PACG.7 Lai, Tham, Lam et al. compared the
retinal nerve fiber layer measurements of attack eyes and their fellow eyes after a single
unilateral attack of acute primary angle closure (APAC) using scanning laser polarimetry six
months after the acute attack8. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage was documented in eyes
where the duration of the APAC attack lasted more than 48 hours8. Decompression retinopathy
following laser peripheral iridoplasty for acute primary angle closure was reported in two
cases reported by Lai, Lee, Leung and Chung.9 In order to compare the efficiency of laser
peripheral iridoplasty and medical treatment, as well as to identify any morbidity that may
come from sudden decompression of the eye, we undertake this randomized controlled trial.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06000865 -
Glaucoma Rehabilitation With Action viDeo Games and Exercise - GRADE
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06278597 -
Automatic Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Angle Width by a New Non-contact Optical Device
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04271709 -
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03274024 -
The Asia Primary Tube Versus Trab (TVT) Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04552964 -
Assessment of the Impact of an add-on and Its Smartphone Application on the Daily Management of Glaucoma
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01957267 -
Functional and Structural Imaging for Glaucoma
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04624698 -
iStent Inject New Enrollment Post-Approval Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04020705 -
The Efficacy of Citicoline in Eyedrops (OMK1) in Reducing the Progression of Glaucoma
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03150160 -
Additive Effect of Twice-daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2%Combination as an Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05581498 -
Glaucoma Exercise as Medicine Study (GEMS).
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02921568 -
Side-by-Side Comparison of P200TE and Spectral OCT/SLO on Diseased Eyes
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02901730 -
Clinical Study of LPI With Different Laser Wavelengths
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02955849 -
A Trial of China Laser and Surgery Study Glaucoma in Rural China
|
Early Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02471105 -
Investigation of IOP and Tolerability of Bimatoprost 0.01% and Tafluprost Unit Dose Preservative Free 15 Microgram/ml
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02554214 -
Pilot Clinical Trial on a New Adjustable Glaucoma Drainage Device
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02390284 -
Stop Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction Study
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02390245 -
Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Detection and Follow-Up Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02246764 -
Study of Netarsudil (AR-13324) Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02520674 -
Glaucoma Screening With Smartphone Ophthalmology
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02628223 -
180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma
|
N/A |