Gingival Recession Clinical Trial
Official title:
Tuberosity Versus Palatal Donor Site for Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in Root Coverage Therapy: a Randomized Clinical Trial (TOPGRAFT)
Gingival recessions are characterized by the apical migration of the marginal gingivae toward
the cemento-enamel junction. Our team in France reported that 84,6% of the population
exhibited gingival recession. Other epidemiologic data report that 25% of an american
population exhibit recessions deeper than 3mm.
Recessions may be associated with thermic or mecanic related pains and increased wear of the
roots. It may causes aesthetic prejudice on smiling. It may also complicate prosthetic
reconstruction when the volume of tissue are insufficient. A study on a Brazilian population
reported that recessions negatively impacted the quality of life in terms of esthetics and
root sensitivity.
Many surgical procedures have been created to treat these recessions. Most of them include a
gingival graft by mean of a sub-epithelial connective tissue graft. Usually it is harvested
in the hard palate. However, the early healing of the palate may be associated with important
pain and discomfort. Another harvesting site is the retromolar tuberosity. It seems to be of
higher tissular quality and lower healing complications. However its limited volume prevent
the harvesting of large graft.
Almost no studies have compared the clinical outcome between palatal and tuberosity graft. A
retrospective study of our team reported higher rate of complet root coverage with tuberosity
graft versus palatal graft (OR=3,78 IC95%). After this observational study, our work
introduce a interventional comparison between the two harvesting sites.
Recruitment and inclusion:
Patients will be recruited from the consultation of the service of periodontology at
Rothschild hospital, Paris, France. All eligible willing participant is included between 2 to
8 weeks before intervention. At that time, data are collected, including periodontal
parameters and standardized photographs.
Randomization:
It is performed right before intervention by the operator via CleanWEB. Surgical protocol
Both test and control groups will be treated with the same flap design. Patient will receive
local anaesthesia at the recession and donor site (articaine hydrochloride 7200 mg/1.8 ml,
adrenalin 1800 mcg/1.8 ml).
Envelope technique:
By means of a blade (Bard-Parker 15C; Beckton Dickinson) incision stars in the sulcus of the
treated teeth, as tissue thickness permits, sharp dissection is used to form a
partial-thickness supraperiosteal envelope extending 3 fo 5 mm internally and apically to
areas of recession, undermining intermediate papillae. The supra-periosteal dissection will
extend well into the mucosal tissues in order to gain flap mobility. The adjacent papillary
tissues will be carefully detached by a full-thickness preparation in their buccal aspect,
thus to allow for a coronal displacement of the mobilized buccal soft tissue complex.
In accord with the randomization process, one of the following techniques could be employed.
The donor area in the palate anesthetized by block anesthesia of the grater palatine and
nasopalatine nerves with a local anesthetic agent containing epinephrine.
Palate : Single-incision technique In this technique, only a single incision parallel 2mm
from the gingival margin is use to access to the donor site for graft harvesting. The angle
of the blade is 90 degrees to the bone. After the first incision the blade is angle to
approximately 135 degrees, and an undermining preparation toward the median is started within
the first incision. With each new movement of the scalpel along the incision line, the angle
is further flattened until the blade reaches a nearly parallel position to the bone surface.
No vertical incisions are to be made, the goal of this procedure is to create a
partial-thickness mucosal flap with a uniform thickness of 1 to 1.5 mm depending in the needs
for the recipient site. The underlying CTG is separated from the surrounding connective
tissue by making incisions to bone on the mesial, distal sides of the graft. The graft can
then be removed by detaching it from the bony surface with a periosteal elevator. Suture of
the donor site: crossed and parallel horizontal suspension sutures secure the incision and
the donor site.
Tuberosity : Distal wedge technique The procedure starts with two converging incisions
perpendicular to the tissue surface and 1.0-1.5 mm deep as far distal to the last molar as
possible while remaining within the masticatory mucosa. Then, an undermining
partial-thickness incision buccal and palatal up to the mesial surface of the last molar is
made. The scalpel is guided successively parallel to the buccal or palatal soft tissue
surfaces to yield a partial-thickness flap of uniform thickness throughout. After a
supraperiosteal incision is made the wedge-shaped graft is removed from he donor site by
sharp dissection. The covering epithelium on the upper part of the graft is consequently
removed extraorally. The donor site is closed with an external horizontal mattress suture
anchored to the periosteum. Additional single interrupted sutures can be used to completely
close the wound.
Graft considerations Care should be taken to avoid graft dehydration from the moment when the
graft is taken until the wound from the donor site is closed, so it should be store in a
gauze soaked in physiologic saline until further use.
Extra oral modifications in SCTGs is often necessary, a fresh scalpel blade could be used to
cut the graft to the desired size and shape and to thin the SCTG as needed, also fat and
glandular tissue remnants detected on the graft should be removed.
Graft positioning and suturing The connective tissue graft is place in the created envelope,
small parts of the CTG could be left uncovered when necessary to achieve a harmonious line of
the gingival margin.
Prior to suturing, the contact points of the affected teeth need to be temporarily splinted
with a flowable, light-curing resin material.
Suturing material is a non resorbable suture (Prolène 5.0: Ethicon - Cornelia, Georgia, USA).
Starting at the buccal aspect, the needle is guided through the buccal soft tissue complex
approximately 5 mm apical to the tip of the papilla. so the needle will reappear in the base
of the palatal papilla area. Consecutively, the needle will be wrapped around the splinted
contact region and slid underneath the contact point to re-appear at the palatal side again
without pinching any soft tissue. The same procedure is repeated once again, now starting
from the palatal aspect.
Thereon the needle will be led over and placed underneath the contact point to re-appear at
the buccal aspect again without pinching any soft tissue
Post-surgical protocol Patients have to avoid mechanical trauma or tooth brushing in the
surgical sites for two weeks. Chlorhexidine rises are prescribed three times per day for two
weeks. Two weeks after the surgery patients are instructed to mechanical tooth cleaning with
a soft brush.
Following this, regular tooth brushing habits are resumed and chlorhexidine rinses
discontinued.
Standardized photograph are also performed.
Follow up visit Supportive care are provided at 6 and 12 months. Data including periodontal
parameters and standardized photographs are collected at the 6 months visit and at the12
months visit by an investigator different from the operator.
This is the last visit of the study. Further supportive care are normally provided at the
hospital.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04462237 -
Recombinant Human Platelet-derived Growth Factor in Combination With Collagen Matrix
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05591326 -
The Effect of Using Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin on Root Surface Closure in Patients With Gingival Recession.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06118177 -
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Palatal Wound Healing
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06044870 -
Clinical Evaluation of the Modified Laterally Stretched Technique (RT2) Gingival Recession vs Tunneling With CT Grafting
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02995070 -
Low Intensity Laser Therapy in Connective Tissue Graft for Root Coverage in Smokers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03204565 -
Effectiveness of Adjunctive Hyaluronic Acid Application in Coronally Advanced Flap in Single Gingival Recession Sites
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01440426 -
Connective Tissue Graft Versus Mucograft Collagen Matrix for Coverage of Multiple Gingival Recession Defects
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02129504 -
Two Techniques for Root Coverage With a Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01547962 -
A Pilot Clinical Trial of Gintuit (TM)in Establishing a Functional Zone of Attached Gingiva
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04043039 -
Platelet Rich Fibrin in the Treatment of Full Thickness Palatal Wounds
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04920136 -
Gain of Keratinized Mucosa Around Teeth and Dental Implants Using a Combination of Strip Gingival Graft and Acellular Dermal Matrix
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03570333 -
Progenitor Potential of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Palatal Tissue Harvested From Molar and Premolar Sites
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05045586 -
MCAT With HA and sCTG Compared With sCTG Alone for Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession: Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05101642 -
Guided Creeping Technique (GCT) in Treating Gingival Recession
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04813302 -
Influence of Anatomical Factors Upon Root Coverage
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06006780 -
Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix for the Treatment of Localized Gingival Recessions A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06044727 -
MINST Versus Conventional Subgingival Instrumentation In RT1 Gingival Recession
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06330662 -
Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid on Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions Using a Coronally Advanced Flap
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05472233 -
Effect of Suturing Protocols on Coronally Advanced Flap for Root Coverage Outcomes
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05563428 -
Free Gingival Graft Versus Connective Tissue Graft
|
N/A |