Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.

Gingival Recession Clinical Trial

Official title:

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Procedure Using VISTA Technique Compared to Modified Coronally Advanced Flap Technique in Conjunction With Platelet Rich Fibrin-membrane.

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03328442
• Other study ID #: CEBD-CU-2017-10-30
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• First received: October 29, 2017
• Last updated: January 14, 2018
• Start date: March 2018
• Est. completion date: March 2020

Study information

• Verified date: January 2018
• Source: Cairo University
• Contact: Mohamed S Saleh, Master
• Phone: 01001628350
• Email: mssaleh213[@]yahoo.com
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession

Description:

Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects.

Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively.

Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 16
• Est. completion date: March 2020
• Est. primary completion date: February 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 55 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age (18-55) Miller's classI and II multiple GR width of KG>2 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

• Systemic diseases Poor oral hygiene Smoking Patient allergy Miller's class III and IV

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Gingival Recession

Intervention

Procedure:
• VISTA Technique
VISTA with PRF membrane includes Treatment of recession class I and II using autologous PRF membrane
• modified coronally advanced flap
modified coronally advanced flap with PRF membrane for Treatment of recession class I and II

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Cairo University

References & Publications (3)

Zadeh HH. Minimally invasive treatment of maxillary anterior gingival recession defects by vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access and platelet-derived growth factor BB. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):653-60. — View Citation

Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1506-14. — View Citation

Zuhr O, Rebele SF, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part I. Clinical and patient-centred outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jun;41(6):582-92. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12178. Epub 2013 Nov 10. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Patient satisfaction	Using a questionnaire which are designed in a dichotomous fashion (yes or no ) and calculated by percentage of answering yes.; it not a scale, the following questions will be asked to the patients; did you feel pain in spite of the medication prescribed?; did you perceive the course of healing unexpected restriction?; did you experience any remaining symptoms of parasethesia?; would you described the under taken effort as reasonable?; have your expectations been fulfilled?	after 6 months