Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Dyspepsia Symptoms Clinical Trial
— LEGENDOfficial title:
Takepron Specified Drug-use Survey "Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Dyspepsia Symptoms"
Verified date | September 2016 |
Source | Takeda |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Japan: Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare |
Study type | Observational |
To evaluate the efficacy of 4-week lansoprazole (Takepron) therapy for subjective symptomatic improvement in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with dyspepsia symptoms
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 14965 |
Est. completion date | December 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | N/A and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with heartburn or acid regurgitation at the start of Takepron administration* , or patients without heartburn and acid regurgitation, but with endoscopic findings classified as Los Angeles grade A-D at the start of Takepron therapy. 2. Patients with symptoms of dyspepsia (i.e., postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, epigastric burning, upper abdominal bloating, nausea/vomiting, or belching) at the start of Takepron administration* *These patients must have answered "never, " "sometimes/mild," "often/moderate," or "frequent/severe" on a 4-point scale questionnaire about subjective symptoms. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who have taken any proton pump inhibitors (including Takepron) within 4 weeks before the start of Takepron administration 2. Patients taking antidepressants |
Observational Model: Cohort, Time Perspective: Prospective
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
n/a |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Takeda |
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Subjective Symptom Improvement Rate | Subjective symptoms were evaluated as "Disappeared," "Improved," "No change," "Worsened," or "Unclear." These categories were based on investigator's definitions. At Week 4, the rate of improvement (i.e. the frequency of an evaluation of "Disappeared" + "Improved") was calculated for each symptom. The percentage of participants with Improvement by symptom was reported. | Start of treatment and Week 4 | No |
Secondary | Frequency of Adverse Events (Adverse Drug Reactions) | Adverse events observed during the observation period were collected by symptom. For adverse drug reactions, frequencies were tabulated by type and seriousness. Adverse events were defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with administration of lansoprazole whether or not it was considered related to treatment. Among these, events that were considered as having a causal relationship with lansoprazole were defined as adverse drug reactions. The rate of participants with adverse events (adverse drug reactions) was reported. | 4 Weeks | Yes |