Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03035916
Other study ID # 3D5l4L463430
Secondary ID 3R210Z893430
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received January 13, 2017
Last updated December 20, 2017
Start date January 20, 2017
Est. completion date July 15, 2017

Study information

Verified date December 2017
Source Jilin University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study evaluates the effect of transversus abdominis plane(TAP) block combined with general anesthesia on perioperative stress response in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy. One third of participants will receive TAP block combined with general anesthesia, another one third of participants will receive epidural anesthesia combined with general anesthesia, while the rest will receive only general anesthesia.


Description:

Clinically, combining epidural with general anaesthesia may confer many advantages to patients undergoing major thoracic, abdominal or orthopaedic surgery. Epidural anaesthesia can attenuate sympathetic hyperactivity and the stress response, maintain bowel peristalsis, spare the use of opioids, and facilitate postoperative feeding and physiotherapy. However, establishing epidural anesthesia is not without risks and contraindications, including refusal by the patient, technical failure, unintentional dural puncture, waist and back pain and local anaesthetic toxicity. When neurologic complications do occur, the resulting morbidity and mortality is considerable. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, is another new regional anesthesia technique, has been introduced as an abdominal wall block capable of providing effective analgesia, reducing opioid consumption, and lessening opioid-related side effects. In addition,TAP block, somewhat as a pre-emptive analgesia approach, is a way of pain intervention before noxious stimulation which has been reported to be potent to attenuate the stress response. Although the analgesia efficiency of TAP block has been widely studied, its effectiveness to suppress stress response has little comparison with classic epidural block and general anesthesia. Unlike epidural anaesthesia, TAP block is easy to administer and lower incidence for side-effects.The investigators hypothesize that the TAP block reduces the stress response of surgery to the similar extent to epidural anaesthesia when combined with a standard general anaesthesia for abdominal surgery.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 91
Est. completion date July 15, 2017
Est. primary completion date May 31, 2017
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Consent

- ASA 1-3

- No contraindication to epidural or ropivacaine

- First time surgery for current conditions

- Not on chronic pain medications or sedative

Exclusion Criteria:

- The subject has a known or suspected allergy to opioid analgesics or ropivacaine

- Emergency patients

- The subject has know central nervous system disease or neurological impairment

- The subject has preoperative infection, and a history of immune and endocrine system disease, chemotherapy, or blood transfusion.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
Transversus abdominis plane block
Participants in this group receive ultrasound-guided TAP block under bilateral costal margin with multiple injections of 40ml 0.375% ropivacaine after the induction of general anesthesia, 30 minutes later the surgery will be started.
Epidural anesthesia
Participants in the Epidural group receive a epidural block (T8-9) with 2 mL of 1.6% lidocaine as a test dose before induction. After a successful placement of epidural catheter, the block then is established with 5 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and continous infusion of 0.375% ropivacaine(5 mL/h) during the surgery.
control
The Control group receives standard IV-inhaled general anesthesia.

Locations

Country Name City State
China China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun Jilin

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Jilin University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Physiological Parameters: Plasma Concentration of Norepinephrine (NE) Venous blood samples will be collected at certain time points. The blood samples are collected in a pre-chilled tubes in ice and are centrifuged within 90min, and then separated plasma are stored at -80°C until analysis. The NE levels are measured by ELISA kits. up to 48h after surgery
Primary Physiological Parameters: Plasma Concentration of Epinephrine (E) Venous blood samples will be collected at certain time points. The blood samples are collected in a pre-chilled tubes in ice and are centrifuged within 90min, and then separated plasma are stored at -80°C until analysis. The E levels are measured by ELISA kits. up to 48h after surgery
Primary Physiological Parameters: Plasma Concentration of Cortisol (Cor) Venous blood samples will be collected at certain time points. The blood samples are collected in a pre-chilled tubes in ice and are centrifuged within 90min, and then separated plasma are stored at -80°C until analysis. The Cor levels are measured by ELISA kits. up to 48h after surgery
Primary Physiological Parameters: Plasma Concentration of Glucose (Glu) When venous blood are collected, glucose levels are measured immediately by Glucometer. up to 48h after surgery
Primary Hemodynamic Parameters: Heart Rate. Continuous monitoring of heart rate to 48 hours after surgery. up to 48h after surgery
Primary Hemodynamic Parameters: Mean Arterial Pressure(MAP) Continuous monitoring of mean arterial pressure(MAP) to 48 hours after surgery. mean arterial pressure(MAP)= (systolic blood pressure+2×diastolic blood pressure)/3 up to 48h after surgery
Secondary Anesthetics Consumption: Sufentanil Consumption Intraoperative superaddition of sufentanil was measured. during operation
Secondary Questionnaire: Pain Scores at Rest Pain scores of the participants will be measured by the Visual Analogue Scale. Measurement of VAS: Draw a 10cm horizontal line on the paper. The VAS were anchored at 0cm(no pain) and 10cm(worst possible pain), the middle part shows varying degrees of pain, the greater of the number, the worse of the pain. 1hr, 6hr, 12hr, 24hr, and 48hr after surgery
Secondary Questionnaire: Pain Scores on Movement Pain scores of the participants will be measured by the Visual Analogue Scale. Measurement of VAS: Draw a 10cm horizontal line on the paper. The VAS were anchored at 0cm(no pain) and 10cm(worst possible pain), the middle part shows varying degrees of pain, the greater of the number, the worse of the pain. 1hr, 6hr, 12hr, 24hr, and 48hr after surgery
Secondary Anesthesia Recovery: the Time of First Flatus The time of first flatus was measured after surgery. Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Secondary Anesthesia Recovery: Number of Participants With Prolonged Hospitalization The percentage of long hospitalization were measured. More than 7 days after surgery is defined as prolonged hospitalization. Through study completion, an average of 2 weeks
Secondary Side Effects: Number of Participants With Sedation The state of sedation was evaluated after surgery during first postoperative 48 hours. up to 48h after surgery
Secondary Side Effects: Number of Participants With Nausea The state of nausea was evaluated after surgery during first postoperative 48 hours. up to 48h after surgery
Secondary Side Effects: Number of Participants With Vomiting The state of vomiting was evaluated after surgery during first postoperative 48 hours. up to 48h after surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03959878 - Feasibility of a Constant Pressure Skin Disk (CPSD) in Enteral Tubes. N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04566367 - Blue Laser Imaging (BLI) for Detection of Secondary Head and Neck Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT04110613 - RCT: Early Feeding After PEG Placement N/A
Completed NCT03319576 - Early Feeding Following Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube Placement N/A
Completed NCT03575754 - A Single-center, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Use and Safety of the Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy Technique N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT06129877 - CHAMP App Feeding Difficulties Repository
Completed NCT04183296 - The Effect of Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Volatile Anesthesia on Shedding of the Endothelial Glycocalyx in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic or Robotic Assisted Gastrectomy N/A
Recruiting NCT02909205 - a Care Protocol for Caregivers and Parents of Children Recently Gastrostomised N/A
Recruiting NCT04636099 - Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group 2001 N/A
Recruiting NCT06464978 - Stapler Reinforcement Patches Compared to Standard Staplers in Gastrojejunostomy N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05955534 - Concomitant Bedside Percutaneous Tracheostomy and Ultrasound Gastrostomy N/A
Completed NCT02869321 - Analgesic Efficacy of Transmucosal Fentanyl for Breakthrough Pain Caused by Interventional Gastrostomy Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05205343 - Trans-Pacific Multicenter Collaborative Study of Minimally Invasive Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancers
Recruiting NCT03874871 - Function Preserving Gastrectomy for T1/2 Gastric Cancer Patients
Completed NCT03252509 - Outpatient Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy in Patients With Head and Neck Tumors N/A
Completed NCT04804631 - Tube Feeding in Children Having a Bone Marrow Transplant
Terminated NCT01825564 - Comparison of RightSpot pH Indicator & RightLevel pH Detector With X-Ray Verification for FT or G-Tube Placement N/A
Completed NCT04919577 - Predictive Factors for Roux Stasis Syndrome
Completed NCT04151030 - Endoscopic Direct-PEG Placement in Patients Unable to Undergo Pull-PEG Procedure N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06431048 - No DIET Trial: Dogmatic Interruption of Enteral nuTrition N/A