View clinical trials related to Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.
Filter by:Unlike upper GI bleeding, for LGIB there is still a paucity of data on clinical presentation, patient characteristics, pathways of care and outcomes for LGIB patients. In-hospital mortality ranges from 1.2% to 8.8% (2-4), according to retrospective studies, but data from prospective series are still limited (5). Present multicentre, prospective, observational study was designed to explore these areas, to assess variations in practice management and to identify factors associated with patient outcomes.
The investigators studied the renal function index level in terlipressin treated cirrhotic patients with upper-gastrointestinal bleeding at different time point.
This project aims to evaluate the data on all patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding(AUGIB) is a common emergency. The NaviCam (ANKON) is a miniaturised wireless endoscope in a single use capsule. It can be remotely controlled with the patient in a magnetic console.. In patients with AUGIB, NaviCam has been compared to conventional esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD) in their diagnostic yields. NaviCam has been shown to detect more lesions including those in the small bowel. There are therefore several theoretical advantages to the use of NaviCam in the management of patients with AUGIB.An initial NaviCam examination allows triaging of patients. Those with low risk lesions can be discharged without EGD and hospital admission. These represent substantial reduction in resource utilisation. In the diagnosis of small bowel lesions, the yield from a video capsule examination is higher closer to the time of index bleed. The primary objective of the study is to determine the diagnostic yield of NaviCam in patients who present with overt signs of AUGIB. In addition, the investigators aim to determine if NaviCam examinations can reduce hospital resource utilisation and compare the use of NaviCam as a triage tool to the use of risk scores such as the Glasgow Blatchford Score (GBS). The investigators hypothesize that early NaviCam examination can allow safe discharge of more patients when compared to GBS.
Pre-market, multi-center, international, double-blind, randomized, controlled, prospective, first-in-human clinical investigation of a Class IIb Investigational Medical Device, in which Patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (AUGIH) and due to undergo a plasma transfusion, will be randomized to receive a one-time infusion (up to 8 hours) of up to two 250 mL units of plasminogen-depleted plasma (PDP) or fresh-frozen plasma (FFP). In case of transfusions needing more than two units, the third unit and above will consist in regular plasma for both treatment groups. Patients will be continuously monitored for 8 hours following the transfusion, and will be assessed between 8-12 hours after plasma transfusion or the following morning (the earlier of the two options), between 24-48 hours after plasma transfusion or at discharge (the earlier of the two options) and after 30+/-3 days after transfusion.
A prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial to evaluate safety and effectiveness of endoscopic hemostatic powder, 'Nexpowder' for hemostatic treatments of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. This study is a prospective, multi-center, single blind (for patients), controlled investigation planned to evaluate safety and effectiveness of Nexpowder with 352 subject patients.
Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a common emergency with significant morbidity, mortality, and cost. Appropriate risk stratification of patients presenting with acute gastrointestinal bleeding aids in the triage of patients to determine need for hospital admission and the need for emergency endoscopic intervention. Increased blood lactate levels are common in critically ill patients. Our study will evaluate the usefulness of lactate measurements on resources utilisation ( intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stay) and other patient-oriented outcomes ( need for transfusion and endoscopy) in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding.
Problem statement GI bleeding can arise from peptic ulcers, malignancy, angiodysplasia or during endoscopic resection procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. This is conventionally treated using heat therapy or clips. These methods carry a risk of thermal injury or perforation. Purastat® is a novel synthetic haemostatic agent licensed as a CE marked device for use in GI bleeding. It also has the potential to enhance endoscopic mucosal wound healing and may play a role in preventing delayed bleeding. However, clinical data on its effectiveness in the GI tract is limited. Prospective data collection on the range of indications for Purastat® use and outcome data related to clinical effectiveness, safety and feasibility is required to inform clinicians about the best use for this agent. Research question / hypothesis To establish a prospective registry study to collect outcome data related to the use of Purastat® for the clinical management of GI bleeding or prevention of bleeding Study Design Prospective multicentre cohort study Study Participants Adults with GI bleeding or a high risk of bleeding during endoscopic procedures where Purastat® has been used Follow-up duration All patients will be followed up as per standard clinical care where applicable Planned Study Period 2 years Primary Objective To assess the effectiveness of Purastat® as a haemostatic agent when used in the treatment of GI bleeding Secondary Objectives To assess the incidence of delayed bleeding after use of Purastat®, defined as procedure related bleeding up to 28 days following endoscopic resection To evaluate the rate of rebleeding following primary application of Purastat® for haemostasis To assess the technical feasibility and ease of use of Purastat® when used in the treatment or prevention of GI bleeding To monitor any unexpected reactions that may be attributed to the use of Purastat® To describe utilisation patterns in different clinical centres (indication, patient characteristics etc) and to observe trends in utilisation over time
The aim of the study is to identify the best method of omeprazole (OME) application with respect to intragastric pH, cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype and phenotype.
This study will evaluate the use of the Olympus EndoCapsule EC-10 video capsule compared with the standard of care workup for patients in the Clinical Decision Unit who have symptoms of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Patients will be eligible if they have any symptoms of GI bleeding, either vomiting blood or symptoms without vomiting blood. Patients randomized to the early capsule arm will have an immediate video capsule endoscopy. Patients randomized to the standard of care arm will have no study intervention and will follow the treating physician's diagnostic workup. The primary goal of the study is to compare how often a source of bleeding is identified in patients in the two groups.