View clinical trials related to Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.
Filter by:The EUS-guided combined therapy of coilingand 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate in patients with gastric varices reduced rebleeding and need for reintervention in comparison to EUS-guided coiling alone.The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of the primary prophylaxis of GOV II and IGV I with the EUS combined therapy versus beta blocker therapy in patients GOV II and IGV that have never bleed.
Hp infection is closely related to upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who need dual-antiplatelet after PCI. Taking anti-Hp treatment has the effect of reducing bleeding risk. Thus, we propose a scientific hypothesis: the C13 breath test may be used to assess the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients who need dual- antiplatelet after PCI.
Problem statement GI bleeding can arise from peptic ulcers, malignancy, angiodysplasia or during endoscopic resection procedures such as endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. This is conventionally treated using heat therapy or clips. These methods carry a risk of thermal injury or perforation. Purastat® is a novel synthetic haemostatic agent licensed as a CE marked device for use in GI bleeding. It also has the potential to enhance endoscopic mucosal wound healing and may play a role in preventing delayed bleeding. However, clinical data on its effectiveness in the GI tract is limited. Prospective data collection on the range of indications for Purastat® use and outcome data related to clinical effectiveness, safety and feasibility is required to inform clinicians about the best use for this agent. Research question / hypothesis To establish a prospective registry study to collect outcome data related to the use of Purastat® for the clinical management of GI bleeding or prevention of bleeding Study Design Prospective multicentre cohort study Study Participants Adults with GI bleeding or a high risk of bleeding during endoscopic procedures where Purastat® has been used Follow-up duration All patients will be followed up as per standard clinical care where applicable Planned Study Period 2 years Primary Objective To assess the effectiveness of Purastat® as a haemostatic agent when used in the treatment of GI bleeding Secondary Objectives To assess the incidence of delayed bleeding after use of Purastat®, defined as procedure related bleeding up to 28 days following endoscopic resection To evaluate the rate of rebleeding following primary application of Purastat® for haemostasis To assess the technical feasibility and ease of use of Purastat® when used in the treatment or prevention of GI bleeding To monitor any unexpected reactions that may be attributed to the use of Purastat® To describe utilisation patterns in different clinical centres (indication, patient characteristics etc) and to observe trends in utilisation over time
The aim of the study is to identify the best method of omeprazole (OME) application with respect to intragastric pH, cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genotype and phenotype.
This study will evaluate the use of the Olympus EndoCapsule EC-10 video capsule compared with the standard of care workup for patients in the Clinical Decision Unit who have symptoms of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Patients will be eligible if they have any symptoms of GI bleeding, either vomiting blood or symptoms without vomiting blood. Patients randomized to the early capsule arm will have an immediate video capsule endoscopy. Patients randomized to the standard of care arm will have no study intervention and will follow the treating physician's diagnostic workup. The primary goal of the study is to compare how often a source of bleeding is identified in patients in the two groups.
Upper Gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a medical emergency and the most common cause of hospitalization associated with digestive disease. Proper initial resuscitation is the first step in the management of UGIB patients. Today, modern pulmonary ultrasound is used in different clinical settings, such as intensive care, emergency medicine and/or traumatology. In the last years, the use of this has been standardized both in internal medicine and in pulmonary medicine. The primary objective is to describe the findings of pulmonary ultrasound and its relationship with severity in patients with UGIB. The investigators will include all patients with UGIB. A pulmonary and vena cava ultrasound will be performed on admission to the emergency room, 10 minutes prior to endoscopy and 24 hours after having performed the endoscopy. The use of thoracic point-of-care ultrasound (TPOCUS) has been standardized in both internal and pulmonary medicine. There is a concern about the role of TPOCUS useful as a severity prognostic tool in patients with UGIB. The team proposes that TPOCUS is a severity prognostic tool in UGIB patients. Main Outcome: To describe the findings of TPOCUS in patients with variceal and non-variceal UGIB. Secondary Objectives: 1. Correlate the presence of B-type lines on TPOCUS with mean arterial pressure in UGIB patients. 2. Correlate the inferior vena cava diameter with the Model for End-stage Liver Disease scale in UGIB patients. 3. Correlate the inferior vena cava diameter with the 48 hours post-admission mortality of UGIB patients. Authors design a prospective, longitudinal, descriptive study to identify the findings of TPOCUS in patients with variceal and non-variceal UGIB. Patients will be included in the study since May 15th through October 30th 2019, admitted to the University Hospital, "Dr. José E. González", Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.
This is an ambispective single-center cohort study of pediatric patients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices. The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of primary prophylaxis with endoscopic variceal ligation to prevent upper gastrointestinal bleeding compared to non-selected beta-blockers prophylaxis.
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common presentation in the Emergency Room. It can deteriorate into severe adverse event. However some are discharged before these events occur. The Oakland-Jairath score was developed to help determine which patients can be safely discharged and which should be admitted from the ER to the hospital. The score did well in its development, but now needs to be externally validated by other independent cohorts. The limitations of the first study will be addressed in our study. The goal of this study is to perform the first prospective, multi-centered, external validation of the Oakland-Jairath risk score on an independent and diverse population who present to the emergency room with LGIB.
The purpose of this study to improve methods of monitoring and diagnosing gastrointestinal bleeding via the E4 wristband, a biosensor watch.
Title: The efficacy of hemostatic powder TC-325 versus standard endoscopic treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding from malignancy; a multi-center randomized trial Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding arising from malignant tumors is increasingly recognized as a result of oncological advances and improved detection methods. However, conventional endoscopic hemostatic methods are not reliable to control bleeding. It has a trend to be an effective hemostasis method for active GI bleeding from tumor, however, in view of the lack of RCTs and large-scale studies, the efficacy of TC-325 is still inconclusive. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of TC325 in endoscopic hemostasis treatment for malignant gastrointestinal hemorrhage.The 24-hour, 72-hour, 30-day, 90-day and 180-day rebleeding rate were assessed as the outcomes of treatment as well as 6-month mortality. Study design: Single-blinded, multi-center, randomized-control trial study The intervention (experimental) arm: TC-325 alone (define failure if continued bleeding despite application of 1 syringes) The control arm: Standard of (traditional) endoscopic treatments ** Crossover is possible. Inclusion criteria: Patients with acute upper or lower GIB from a lesion that is actively bleeding at index endoscopy (spurting or oozing) and is suspected to be malignant or diagnosed as malignancy from previous tissue diagnosis. Exclusion criteria: Patients less than 18 years old, previously included in the trial, ECOG score 3 or 4, pregnancy/lactation, and/or bleeding from GI sources suspected of not being malignant. If an endoscopist is unsure of the malignant likelihood of the lesion, he/she will not be enrolled. Sample size: 112 in total Duration of participation for each volunteer: 180 days