View clinical trials related to Gastroesophageal Reflux.
Filter by:This is a single-center, randomized, open-label clinical study to assess the treatment response of high-dose rabeprazole compared with standard-dose rabeprazole in patients with extra-esophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a common problem affecting 10-20% of the population in the Western World. Surgical therapy is able to restore the EGJ barrier function against reflux of the gastric content, decreases symptoms and improves the quality of life in GERD patients. However, there remain concerns regarding postoperative adverse events and the durability of the surgical procedure. The ability to perform endoscopic full-thickness plications with Endomina-v2 will be used to assess safety and feasibility of the procedure in reducing GERD in patients suffering with chronic GERD, unsatisfied with PPIs, and/or complaining of persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI use.
This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical Study to evaluate the efficacy of DA-5204 and proton pump inhibitor combination therapy compared with proton pump inhibitor alone therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux Disease.
To explore the effects of bile reflux on gastric cancer and its precancerous lesions, so as to better prevent the occurrence and development of gastric cancer.
Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of YYD601 in NERD Patients
Introduction Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery is considered standard of care in surgical treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and is not without risks of adverse effects, most notably disruption of the fundoplication, post-fundoplication dysphagia and gas-bloat-syndrome, in some cases leading to reoperation. Non-surgical factors such as pre-existing anxiety or depression disorders can influence postoperative satisfaction and symptom relief. Previous studies have focused on short-term follow-up or only certain aspects of disease, resulting in a less than complete picture. The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term patient-satisfaction and durability of laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery in a large Danish cohort using comprehensive multimodal follow-up, and using the results of follow-up, to develop a clinically applicable scoring system usable in selecting patients for anti-reflux surgery. Methods and analysis The study is a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from patient records and follow-up with patient-reported quality of life as well as registry-based data. The study population consists of all adult patients having undergone laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery at The Department of Surgery, Kolding Hospital, a part of Lillebaelt Hospital Denmark in an 11-year period. From electronic records; patient characteristics, preoperative endoscopic findings, reflux disease characteristics and details on type of surgery, will be identified. Disease specific quality-of-life and dysphagia will be identified from patient-reported follow-up. From Danish national registries, data on comorbidity, reoperative surgery, use of pharmacological anti-reflux treatment, mortality and socioeconomic factors will be included. Primary outcome of this study is treatment success at follow-up. Ethics and dissemination For the study approval will be sought from The Danish Patient Safety Agency, The Danish Health Data Authority and Statistics Denmark, complying to Danish and EU current legislation. Inclusion in the study will require informed consent from participating subjects.
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active comparator, multi-centers, non-inferiority design clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of YYD601 in ERD patients (phase 3).
To Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of EsoDuo Tab. 20/800mg
The diagnostics of extraesophageal reflux (EER) is challenging. Currently, 24-h dual-probe esophageal pH monitoring or impedance is considered the best diagnostic method for EER. The 24-h oropharyngeal pH monitoring is a newer method aimed at detecting episodes of reflux to the oropharynx. Unfortunately, all these methods have many disadvantages. Pepsin detection in saliva would be an almost ideal diagnostic technique. However, data of its reliability is lacking. The aim of the study is to compare results of oropharyngeal pH monitoring and esophageal impedance monitoring, compared to a quantified pepsin presence in the saliva obtained immediately prior to 24-hour monitoring and to evaluate the feasibility of this technique as a routine option of diagnosing the presence of extraesophageal reflux.
This study will enroll patients with persistent reflux symptoms despite proton-pump inhibitor therapy and chronic insomnia. Participants that are eligible for the study and agree to participate will receive cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTI) delivered by a web-based approach. The goal of the treatment is to improve the participants insomnia and reflux symptoms. In addition to the cognitive behavioral therapy, participants will be asked to keep a daily diary and periodically complete questionnaires to assess their symptoms.