Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Indocyanine Green Tracing in 3D Fluorescent Laparoscopic Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer

Gastric Cancer Clinical Trial

Official title: Clinical Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Submucosal Injection of Indocyanine Green Tracer in 3D Fluorescent Laparoscopic Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer: a Prospective, a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study Clinical Trial

Status Not yet recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Purpose of the study To evaluate whether the clinical efficacy of submucosal injection of indocyanine green tracer laparoscopic gastric cancer lymph node dissection is superior to that of laparoscopic gastric cancer lymph node dissection without indocyanine green tracer in 3D fluorescence laparoscopic mode in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4a, N-/+, M0). To observe the role of submucosal injection of ICG for tumor localization in fluorescence 3D fluorescence laparoscopic surgery and the application of lymph node dissection in laparoscopic radical surgery for gastric cancer.

Study design. Multicenter, randomized, open, parallel-controlled, superiority design. Subgroups Group A (experimental group): indocyanine green tracer 3D laparoscopic gastric cancer lymph node dissection group Group B (control group): no indocyanine green tracer 3D laparoscopic gastric cancer lymph node dissection group.

Study population Patients who met all the inclusion criteria and did not fall into any of the exclusion criteria were eligible to enter this study.

Randomization Patients were first evaluated preoperatively to determine that they could receive laparoscopic radical gastric cancer treatment and receive endoscopic indocyanine green labeling. Once the enrolled cases were determined to meet the admission criteria after laparoscopic exploration, they could be enrolled in this study for randomization. The central dynamic, stratified zone randomization method was used in this study, and the control factors considered were age, tumor site, and preoperative stage. Given the number of seeds and the length of the zones, SAS 9.2 programming was applied to generate the treatment allocation corresponding to the running number 484, which was deposited in the data center. A person at the participating research center was responsible for sending the enrolled case information (age, tumor site, and preoperative stage) to the randomization implementation department at the data center by email, phone, or SMS, and the contact person at each respective research center confirmed that the patient met the enrollment criteria, contacted the contact person for the assigned case in this study, and determined the enrollment of the case by further analyzing the case information, and at the same time, notified the contact person at the research center where the case was located The contact person of the research center where the case is located will be notified at the same time. Competitive enrollment was used in this study.

Blinding.

Clinical Trial Description

Case enrollment period: complete enrollment of the required cases within 2 years.

Follow-up period: The 1st case enrollment is the starting point for follow-up, and the last case enrollment to the time of return of the postoperative pathology report (usually 2 weeks postoperatively) is the endpoint of follow-up for secondary study purposes except for the 2-year recurrence type. 2 years after the last 1 case enrollment is the follow-up endpoint for the primary study purpose.

Estimated time: 2024.5-2026.4 (completion of enrollment) - 2028.4 (completion of follow-up) Standardization of Surgical Procedures. Commonly followed principles of handling in both groups Anesthesia All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation; the use of epidural-assisted anesthesia depended on the anesthesiologist and was not prescribed in this study.

Obtaining cytologic specimens for abdominal lavage After entering the abdominal cavity, firstly, the cytology specimen of abdominal lavage was retained for postoperative examination (Specific method: ascites was taken directly when ascites was found to be present. If there is no ascites, 100 ml of saline is slowly injected into the abdominal cavity, and the washings are collected and sampled in the Douglas fossa for examination.) Intraoperative exploration After obtaining cytologic specimens from abdominal lavage, the abdominal cavity is explored to check for metastases to the liver, peritoneum, mesentery, and pelvis, and invasion of the gastric plasma membrane.

Provisions for lymph node dissection Gastric cancer D2 lymph node dissection is performed according to the Japanese Guidelines for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer (5th ed.) Lymph node dissection is performed in patients in group A. After lymph node dissection, the NIR mode is used to check for the presence of missing lymph nodes, and if there are any, remedial dissection is performed.

The rules about off-site lymph node dissection: when the tumor is located in the greater curvature of the stomach, or the splenic hilar lymph nodes are enlarged on preoperative imaging, or the lymph nodes in group 10 are visualized intraoperatively, selective splenic preservation and splenic hilar lymph node dissection will be performed for the lymph nodes in group 10; group 14 lymph nodes will also be selectively disseminated when they are visualized intraoperatively; and other off-site lymph nodes will be disseminated or not by decision of the surgeon if they are visualized intraoperatively. The cleared extrastriate lymph nodes should be sent for examination and recorded separately.

Provisions for gastrectomy According to the "Japanese Guidelines for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer" (5th edition), distal or total gastrectomy should be performed as long as the oncologic principle can be guaranteed. If the operator decides to perform total laparoscopic gastrointestinal reconstruction, a sterile marker pen is required to determine the surgical incision line based on the indocyanine green range or other methods before dissecting the gastric wall, and to preserve the photographic data.

Provision for resection of the greater omentum This study protocol requires total greater omentectomy for patients with progressive gastric cancer, and the remainder is not prescribed.

Provisions for digestive tract reconstruction The way of digestive tract reconstruction shall be decided by the surgeon according to his/her own experience and intraoperative conditions, if instrumental anastomosis is used, whether to manually reinforce the anastomosis with suture shall be decided by the surgeon, and it is not stipulated in this study protocol.

Provisions for Surgery-Related Devices and Instruments Energy devices, methods of vascular ligation, GI cutting and closing, and GI reconstruction instruments are determined by the surgeon responsible for the procedure based on experience and actual needs, and are not specified in this study protocol.

Provisions for gastric tube and abdominal drainage tube Whether to keep gastric tube or abdominal drainage tube after surgery is decided by the responsible surgeon based on experience and actual needs, and is not stipulated in this study protocol.

Provisions for other surgeries performed at the same time If intraoperative findings of comorbidities of other systems/organs are detected, and the surgeon in charge of the surgery and the consulting surgeon of the relevant department jointly decide that concurrent surgery is needed to deal with them, concurrent surgery can be performed, and the sequence is decided according to the clinical routine; however, cases are excluded from the PP set according to the exclusion criteria, and the cases are excluded from the PP set.

Provisions for the treatment of excluded cases found during surgery After the patient is judged to be a cull case by the surgeon responsible for the surgery during the operation, this study protocol is suspended, and the surgeon responsible for the surgery decides the follow-up treatment by himself/herself in accordance with the clinical practice routines of the participating centers (therapeutic decision-making on whether or not to carry out the resection of the primary gastric lesion, metastasis, etc., shall be decided by the surgeon responsible for the surgery) Provisions for laparoscopic surgery Provisions for pneumoperitoneum Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum is used with a maintenance pressure of 12-13 mmHg, which may be appropriately lowered in advanced age.

Provisions for poking holes and auxiliary incisions The location of puncture holes and auxiliary small incisions is not regulated, and the number of puncture holes should not exceed 5. Only 1 auxiliary small incision may be made, and it must usually be less than 10 cm. when an auxiliary small incision of more than 10 cm is required, the decision must be made at the discretion of the surgeon in charge of the procedure, and the rationale must be documented in detail in the CRF.

Definition of laparoscopic access Intra-abdominal operations must be performed using laparoscopic instruments supported by a camera system. Perigastric freeing, resection of the greater omentum, resection of the omental bursa, lymph node dissection, and management of the vasculature should be accomplished laparoscopically. Gastric resection, and digestive tract reconstruction, are permitted to be accomplished in the open state using auxiliary small incisions.

Provisions for intermediate open abdomen In the event of intraoperative intra-abdominal hemorrhage, organ injury, or other serious/life-threatening complications due to surgical manipulation, which are difficult to control laparoscopically, the abdomen must be actively staged and opened. If intraoperative complications due to carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum occur, and the anesthesiologist and the surgeon in charge of the operation discuss that it may threaten the patient's life safety, the abdomen must be actively transferred and opened. Other technical, instrumental, and other factors that lead to an intermediate open abdomen are decided by the surgeon in charge of the operation, and the reasons are recorded. The length of the incision for a mid-rotation open abdomen was not regulated in this study. The reason for the mid-excision needs to be clearly documented in the CRF.

Follow-up of rejected cases in the laparoscopic group Whether to continue the surgery under laparoscopy or to intermediate open surgery is at the discretion of the surgeon in charge of the surgery based on clinical experience.

Technical approach to indocyanine green tracing in the study group Patients enrolled in group A (study group) were injected with 1 ml of indocyanine green (indocyanine green for injection, 25 mg/strike, indocyanine green for injection diluted to 0.625 mg/ml with sterilized water for injection) into the submucosal layer of the tumor at a total of four points in the four quadrants of the tumor before the operation, and the submucosal dark-green elevation could be observed after the injection of ICG. Intraoperative visualization of the SLN tracer was performed using ICG system products. (In cT1-2 patients, if the intraoperative position is difficult to determine, preoperative marking with a harmonized titanium clip is added). ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Gastric Cancer
• Stomach Neoplasms

• NCT number: NCT06421220
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: May 20, 2024
• Completion date: April 30, 2028