Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04593615
Other study ID # CLASS-11
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 10, 2020
Est. completion date August 17, 2028

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source Fujian Medical University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (CT2-4a N0/+ M0) were selected as study subjects to investigate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of ICG near-infrared imaging tracing in guiding laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer by comparing injection ICG group and non-injection ICG group.


Description:

1. Research purpose Patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (cT2-4a, N0/+, M0) were selected as study subjects to investigate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of ICG near-infrared imaging tracing in guiding laparoscopic D2 LND for GC by comparing an injection ICG group and a non-injection ICG group. 2. Research design Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-control, parallel assignment, superiority test. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04593615. IRB number: 2020YF028-01 2.1 multicenter This study was conducted in 15 centers, including Fujian Medical University Union Hospital; Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute; Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University; Teaching Hospital of Putian First Hospital of Fujian Medical University; Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University; The First Hospital of Jilin University; Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital; The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University; Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University; Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences; and Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center. 2.2 Case Group Group A (Study Group, 535 cases): Laparoscopic gastrectomy group with the use of near-infrared imaging (ICG group) Group B (Control Group, 535 cases): Laparoscopic gastrectomy group without the use of near-infrared imaging (Non-ICG group) 2.3 Estimate Sample Size The three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was this study's main effectiveness evaluation index. The study implemented a superiority test (unilateral), assuming that the study group's three-year DFS would be better than that of the control group,23, according to previous research results of laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced GC in which the three-year DFS was 65.2%; therefore, the 3-year DFS of the control group would be 65.2%, assuming that the 3-year DFS of the experimental group could be increased by 9% to 74.2%. With an inspection level of 0.025 (unilateral) and an inspection efficiency of 0.9 and using PASS 11 log-rank tests (Lakatos) [Proportion surviving] the calculated sample size was N=428; namely, each group needed 428 people, considering cases of possible exclusion and loss to follow-up (20% drop out rate). The final sample size for each group was 535 cases, for 1070 cases. Approximately 62-63 cases were initially assigned to each center. 2.4 randomization After laparoscopic exploration and confirmation that the cases complied with the standards, they were included in the randomized groups in this study. We adopted the central dynamic layered segment randomization method, with control factors including age, gender, tumor location, clinical staging, research center of the given seed number, and segment length. SAS 9.2 produced a serial number ranging from 0001 - 1070 corresponding to the treatment allocation, which was reserved in the data center and research center. Each center had a specialist who sent the patients' information (age, sex, tumor location, clinical staging, and research center) to the randomization implementation department of the data center via email, telephone call, or text message, and the central randomization department analyzed this information to determine the case enrollment and inform the research center. 2.5 Blinding Method: This research adopts an open design. 2.6 Research cycle: Estimated enrollment cycle: complete enrollment within 2 years. Follow-up period: Enrolling the first case was the starting point for follow-up. and the enrollment of the last case to the postoperative pathology report (generally 2 weeks after surgery) was the endpoint of follow-up for secondary outcomes. The follow-up endpoint for the main outcomes was three years after the last case was enrolled. Estimated time: 2020.11-2022.10 (complete enrollment) to 2025.10 (complete follow-up) 3. Study Objects All patients who meet the inclusion criteria and do not conform to the exclusion criteria are qualified for this study.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 1070
Est. completion date August 17, 2028
Est. primary completion date August 17, 2026
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Age from 18 to 75 years 2. Primary gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary, tubular, mucinous, signet ring cell, or poorly differentiated) confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy 3. cT2-4a, N-/+, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition 4. No distant metastasis, no direct invasion of pancreas, spleen or other adjacent organs in the preoperative examinations 5. Performance status of 0 or 1 on the ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale 6. ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) class I to III 7. Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: 1. Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding 2. Severe mental disorder 3. History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy) 4. History of previous gastric surgery (including ESD/EMR for gastric cancer) 5. Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node (diameter over 3cm) supported by preoperative imaging including enlarged or bulky No.10 lymph nodes 6. Other malignant disease within the past 5 years 7. History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy 8. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months 9. History of cerebrovascular accident within past six months 10. History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month 11. Requirement for simultaneous surgery for other disease 12. Emergency surgery due to complication (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer 13. FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second)<50% of predicted values 14. Diffuse invasive gastric cancer 15. Tumors preoperatively confirmed to involve the squamocolumnar junction or duodenum 16. History of an iodine allergy 17. Patients who declined laparoscopic surgery

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
ICG near-infrared imaging
Indocyanine green tracer is used to guide laparoscopic D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer

Locations

Country Name City State
China Fujian Medical University Union Hospital Fuzhou Fujian

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Fujian Medical University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary 3-year disease free survival rate Disease-free survival is calculated from the day of surgery to the day of recurrence or death 3 years
Secondary Total number of retrieved lymph nodes Total number of retrieved lymph nodes 30 days
Secondary Noncompliance rate of lymph node dissection The LN dissection rate was determined by the number of patients in whom a LN station was harvested divided by the total number of patients who required retrieval at the corresponding LN station. Within the scope of D2 dissection, LN noncompliance was defined as the absence of LNs that should have been resected from > 1 LN station. 30 days
Secondary Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in group A and total number of lymph nodes in group A Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in group A and total number of lymph nodes in group A 30 days
Secondary Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and positive lymph nodes in Group A (positive rate) Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and positive lymph nodes in Group A (positive rate) 30 days
Secondary Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and negative lymph nodes in Group A (false positive rate) Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and negative lymph nodes in Group A (false positive rate) 30 days
Secondary Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and negative lymph nodes in group A (negative rate) Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and negative lymph nodes in group A (negative rate) 30 days
Secondary Relationship between nonfluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and positive lymph nodes in Group A (false negative rate) Relationship between nonfluorescent lymph nodes in Group A and positive lymph nodes in Group A (false negative rate) 30 days
Secondary Number of metastatic lymph nodes Number of metastatic lymph nodes 30 days
Secondary Metastasis rate of lymph nodes Metastasis rate of lymph nodes 30 days
Secondary Postoperative complications Postoperative complications were evaluated within 30 days following surgery. These postoperative complications include gastrointestinal-related complications, incision-related complications, respiratory complications, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular complications, urinary system complications, infection complications, embolism complications, and other complications. The grading of postoperative complications adopts the Clavien-Dindo classification. 30 days
Secondary Mortality rates Patient died during hospitalization. 30 days
Secondary 3-year overall survival rate 3-year overall survival rate 3 years
Secondary 3-year recurrence pattern 3-year recurrence pattern 3 years
Secondary Postoperative recovery course Time to first flatus after surgery, time to first ambulation after surgery, time to first liquid diet after surgery, time to first semi-liquid diet after surgery, length of hospital stay after surgery. 30 days
Secondary The incidence of intraoperative complications Intraoperative complications were defined as bleeding due to named vessel injury, injury to visceral organs, mechanical factor-related problems, cardiopulmonary dysfunction due to hypercapnia, and other complications 30 days
Secondary Postoperative nutritional status and quality of life Postoperative nutritional status and quality of life 3 years
Secondary Inflammatory and immune response Inflammatory and immune response 3 years
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05551416 - The EpiGASTRIC/EDGAR Project: New Strategies for the Early Detection and Prevention of Gastric Cancer
Completed NCT05518929 - Hypoxia During Gastroenterological Endoscope Procedures Sedated With Ciprofol In Overweight Or Obesity Patients Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06006390 - CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03219593 - Apatinib as the First-Line Therapy in Elderly Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05489211 - Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03) Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05536102 - The Effectiveness and Safety of XELOX and Tislelizumab + PLD for Resectable Gastric Cancer (LidingStudy) Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03170960 - Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06010862 - Clinical Study of CEA-targeted CAR-T Therapy for CEA-positive Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Solid Tumors Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05415098 - Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy of APG-5918 in Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT04082364 - Combination Margetuximab, Retifanlimab, Tebotelimab, and Chemotherapy Phase 2/3 Trial in HER2+ Gastric/GEJ Cancer Phase 2/Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT03766607 - Trastuzumab Beyond Progression in HER2 Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04118114 - Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 2
Completed NCT01924533 - Efficacy and Safety Study of Olaparib in Combination With Paclitaxel to Treat Advanced Gastric Cancer. Phase 3
Terminated NCT01641939 - A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Taxane in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05107674 - A Study of NX-1607 in Adults With Advanced Malignancies Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT04908813 - Study of HLX22 in Combanition With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Versus Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04249739 - Pembrolizumab + Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (CapeOx) -HER2 Nagative and Pembrolizumab + Trastuzumab + Cisplatin/Capecitabine HER2 Positive Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05514158 - To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of Disitamab Vedotin Combined With RC98 in the Treatment of Subjects With HER2-expressing Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer (Including AEG) Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04931654 - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7789 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03175224 - APL-101 Study of Subjects With NSCLC With c-Met EXON 14 Skip Mutations and c-Met Dysregulation Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 2