Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04443478
Other study ID # CLASS-10
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date August 1, 2020
Est. completion date July 1, 2026

Study information

Verified date November 2021
Source Peking University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational [Patient Registry]

Clinical Trial Summary

Mediastinal lymph node dissection has been adopted as standard treatment for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(AEJ). This multi-center, exploratory, prospective, cohort study aims at provide standard technical details of laparoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection, and explore the potential clinical effects, gather key information for following study regarding sample size calculation, primary outcome and feasibility.


Description:

Introduction: Lower mediastinal lymph node dissection has been adopted as standard by treatment guideline for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction(AEJ), but the effect of laparoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection remains unknown. The aim of this study is to provide standard technical details of laparoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection, and explore the potential clinical effects, gather key information for following study regarding sample size calculation, primary outcome and feasibility. This study report intervention development, governance procedures and selection and reporting of outcomes to optimize methods for using the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, Long-term follow-up (IDEAL) framework for surgical innovation that informs evidence-based practice. Methods and analysis: This is an IDEAL stage II, prospective, parallel control, open label, multi-center and exploratory study. The inclusion criteria is Siewert II/ III, AEJ, cT2-4aN0-3M0(AJCC-8th Gastric Cancer TNM stage manual), decide to receive radical gastrectomy, without preoperative anti-neoplastic therapy. The individual included in the study is performed the radical total or proximal gastrectomy plus the lower mediastinal lymphadenectomy via either laparoscopic (trial arm) or open (control arm) TH approach. The surgical approach is determined by the investigator in each center before the operation and recorded in the electronic case report forms (CRF). The primary outcome is the number of lower mediastinal lymph nodes retrieved. Secondary outcome include complication, surgery length, postoperative death, R0 resection rate, etc. Expected sample size is 518 in each group, thus has 80% power to detect a difference of 0.17 in the average number of lower mediastinal lymph node dissected in between two groups.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 1036
Est. completion date July 1, 2026
Est. primary completion date July 1, 2023
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - 18-80 years old; - Karnofsky score =70%;Or ECOG score =2; - Preoperative pathological biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma. - According to gastroscopy, abdominal CT or upper gastrointestinal angiography, the tumor site conforms to the definition of esophageal and gastric junction adenocarcinoma in the "Chinese expert consensus", that is, the tumor center is within 5cm above and below the esophagogastric anatomical junction and crosses or touches the esophagogastric junction; - Length of esophageal invasion =2cm; - By abdominal contrast-enhanced CT/MRI, the clinical stage was CT2-4aN0-3M0 (according to AJCC-8th TNM tumor stage); - Subject's blood routine and biochemical indicators meet the following standards: hemoglobin =80g/L; Absolute count of neutrophils (ANC) =1.5×109/L; Platelet =75×109/L;ALT and AST=2.5 times the normal upper limit; ALP=2.5 times the normal upper limit; Serum total bilirubin =1.5 times the normal upper limit; Serum creatinine = the normal upper limit; Serum albumin =30g/L; - Obtain written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: - Any anti-cancerous treatment received prior to surgery. - Multiple malignant lesions in the stomach. - Suspicious lymph node metastasis in the middle and/or upper mediastinum. - Surgical history in the upper abdomen (laparoscopic cholecystectomy excluded). - Pregnant or breastfeeding women. - Uncontrolled epilepsy, central nervous system disease or mental disorder. - The Bulky N2 status. - The emergency surgery. - Severe heart disease. - History of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within 6 months. - Organ transplant recipients who need immunosuppressive therapies. - Other malignancy diagnosed within 5 years (cured dermoid caner and cervical cancer excluded).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Radical gastrectomy with dissection of lower mediastinal lymph node
Radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer should be consistent with Japanese gastric cancer treatment guideline.

Locations

Country Name City State
China Beijing Cancer Hospital Beijing Beijing

Sponsors (31)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Peking University Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Beijing Cancer Hospital, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Changzhi People's Hospital, Chinese PLA General Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University, First Hospital of China Medical University, Fudan University, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Hebei Medical University Fourth Hospital, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, RenJi Hospital, Ruijin Hospital, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, West China Hospital, Wuhan Union Hospital, China, Xijing hospital of air force Medical University, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (11)

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):313. — View Citation

Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;34(12):1350-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215. Epub 2016 Feb 22. — View Citation

Huang CM, Lv CB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for Siewert type II and III esophagogastric junction carcinoma: a propensity score-matched case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3495-3503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5375-y. Epub 2016 Dec 15. — View Citation

Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. Epub 2020 Feb 14. — View Citation

Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ; Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346. — View Citation

Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994 Apr;4(2):146-8. Erratum in: Surg Laparosc Endosc. 2013 Oct;23(5):480. — View Citation

Kurokawa Y, Takeuchi H, Doki Y, Mine S, Terashima M, Yasuda T, Yoshida K, Daiko H, Sakuramoto S, Yoshikawa T, Kunisaki C, Seto Y, Tamura S, Shimokawa T, Sano T, Kitagawa Y. Mapping of Lymph Node Metastasis From Esophagogastric Junction Tumors: A Prospective Nationwide Multicenter Study. Ann Surg. 2021 Jul 1;274(1):120-127. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003499. — View Citation

Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS, Piessen G. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 25;380(17):e28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1901650. — View Citation

Sugita S, Kinoshita T, Kaito A, Watanabe M, Sunagawa H. Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):383-390. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5687-6. Epub 2017 Jun 27. — View Citation

Sugita S, Kinoshita T, Kuwata T, Tokunaga M, Kaito A, Watanabe M, Tonouchi A, Sato R, Nagino M. Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection for patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):340-348. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07406-w. Epub 2020 Feb 5. — View Citation

Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Wang K, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Hu Y, Liu H, Zheng C, Li P, Xie J, Liu F, Li Z, Zhao G, Yang K, Liu C, Li H, Chen P, Ji J, Li G; Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (CLASS) Group. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 May 28;321(20):1983-1992. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5359. — View Citation

* Note: There are 11 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Quality evaluation index of Lower Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy surgical characteristics that are directly related to the safety outcome of surgery through study completion, an average of 3 years
Other Learning curve of Lower Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy refers to the number of surgical cases corresponding to the transition point through study completion, an average of 3 years
Other Treatment tendency of surgeons and patients the proportion of persons willing to receive treatment in randomization through study completion, an average of 3 years
Other Number of patients that can be screened and successfully recruited The number of patients that can be screened, excluded, successfully recruited, intervented, and followed up throughout each phase of the study. through study completion, an average of 3 years
Primary The number of lower mediastinal lymph nodes retrieved The number of lower mediastinal lymph nodes retrieved immediately after the pathology report issued
Secondary Rate of complication during Lower Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy Complication during Lower Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy & anastomosis, including damage of pericardium, esophagus, etc. immediately after the surgery
Secondary Rate of postoperative complication after Lower Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy Postoperative complication after Lower Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy, including leakage, bleeding, etc, complication related with Lower Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy Day 30 after surgery
Secondary Time length of Lower Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy Time length of Lower Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy immediately after the surgery
Secondary Rate of Postoperative complication Any complication within 30d after surgery Day 30 after surgery
Secondary Rate of postoperative death death within 30 days after surgery Day 30 after surgery
Secondary Rate of unscheduled reoperation reoperation within 30 days after surgery Day 30 after surgery
Secondary Rate of unscheduled readmission unscheduled readmission within 30 days after surgery Day 30 after surgery
Secondary R0 resection rate R0 resection rate immediately after the pathology report issued
Secondary Proximal margin length from proximal tumor margin to proximal margin 30minutes after removal of tumor
Secondary Local recurrence of lower mediastinal area in 3 years Local recurrence of lower mediastinal area in 3 years Year 3 after surgery
Secondary Rate of cancer specific death in 3 years Rate of cancer specific death in 3 years Year 3 after surgery
Secondary Recurrence free survival in 3 years Recurrence free survival in 3 years Year 3 after surgery
Secondary Overall survival in 3 years Overall survival in 3 years Year 3 after surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05551416 - The EpiGASTRIC/EDGAR Project: New Strategies for the Early Detection and Prevention of Gastric Cancer
Completed NCT05518929 - Hypoxia During Gastroenterological Endoscope Procedures Sedated With Ciprofol In Overweight Or Obesity Patients Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06006390 - CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03219593 - Apatinib as the First-Line Therapy in Elderly Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05489211 - Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03) Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05536102 - The Effectiveness and Safety of XELOX and Tislelizumab + PLD for Resectable Gastric Cancer (LidingStudy) Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03170960 - Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06010862 - Clinical Study of CEA-targeted CAR-T Therapy for CEA-positive Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Solid Tumors Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05415098 - Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy of APG-5918 in Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT04082364 - Combination Margetuximab, Retifanlimab, Tebotelimab, and Chemotherapy Phase 2/3 Trial in HER2+ Gastric/GEJ Cancer Phase 2/Phase 3
Withdrawn NCT03766607 - Trastuzumab Beyond Progression in HER2 Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04118114 - Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 2
Completed NCT01924533 - Efficacy and Safety Study of Olaparib in Combination With Paclitaxel to Treat Advanced Gastric Cancer. Phase 3
Terminated NCT01641939 - A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Taxane in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05107674 - A Study of NX-1607 in Adults With Advanced Malignancies Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT04908813 - Study of HLX22 in Combanition With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Versus Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04249739 - Pembrolizumab + Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (CapeOx) -HER2 Nagative and Pembrolizumab + Trastuzumab + Cisplatin/Capecitabine HER2 Positive Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05514158 - To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of Disitamab Vedotin Combined With RC98 in the Treatment of Subjects With HER2-expressing Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer (Including AEG) Phase 1
Recruiting NCT04931654 - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7789 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03175224 - APL-101 Study of Subjects With NSCLC With c-Met EXON 14 Skip Mutations and c-Met Dysregulation Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 2