Gastric Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Submucosal and Subserosal Approaches Toward Optimized Indocyanine Green Tracer-Guided Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer: The FUGES-019 Randomized Clinical Trial
Verified date | October 2023 |
Source | Fujian Medical University |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether submucosal or subserous injection of indocyanine green during laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for patients with gastric cancer was different. The patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4a, N0/+, M0) were studied.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 266 |
Est. completion date | October 28, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | November 27, 2020 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion criteria: 1. Age from 18 to 75 years 2. Primary gastric adenocarcinoma (papillary, tubular, mucinous, signet ring cell, or poorly differentiated) confirmed pathologically by endoscopic biopsy 3. Clinical stage tumor T1-4a (cT1-4a), N0/+, M0 at preoperative evaluation according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual Eighth Edition. Preoperative staging was made by conducting mandatory computed tomography (CT) scans and an optional endoscopic ultrasound 4. No distant metastasis, no direct invasion of pancreas, spleen or other organs nearby in the preoperative examinations 5. Performance status of 0 or 1 on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale (ECOG) 6. American Society of Anesthesiology score (ASA) class I, II, or III 7. Written informed consent Exclusion criteria: 1. Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding 2. Severe mental disorder 3. History of previous upper abdominal surgery (except laparoscopic cholecystectomy) 4. History of previous gastrectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection 5. Rejection of laparoscopic resection 6. History of allergy to iodine agents 7. Enlarged or bulky regional lymph node diameter over 3cm by preoperative imaging 8. History of other malignant disease within past five years 9. History of previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy 10. History of unstable angina or myocardial infarction within past six months 11. History of cerebrovascular accident within past six months 12. History of continuous systematic administration of corticosteroids within one month 13. Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease 14. Emergency surgery due to complication (bleeding, obstruction or perforation) caused by gastric cancer 15. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)<50% of predicted values 16. Linitis plastica, Widespread |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | Department of Gastric Surgery | Fuzhou | Fujian |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Fujian Medical University |
China,
Bredart A, Bottomley A, Blazeby JM, Conroy T, Coens C, D'Haese S, Chie WC, Hammerlid E, Arraras JI, Efficace F, Rodary C, Schraub S, Costantini M, Costantini A, Joly F, Sezer O, Razavi D, Mehlitz M, Bielska-Lasota M, Aaronson NK; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group and Quality of Life Unit. An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32). Eur J Cancer. 2005 Sep;41(14):2120-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.041. — View Citation
Chen QY, Xie JW, Zhong Q, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Zheng HL, Li P, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Safety and Efficacy of Indocyanine Green Tracer-Guided Lymph Node Dissection During Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy in Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):300-311. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6033. — View Citation
Chen QY, Zhong Q, Liu ZY, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Cao LL, Lin M, Tu RH, Huang ZN, Lin JL, Li P, Zheng CH, Huang CM. Does Noncompliance in Lymph Node Dissection Affect Oncological Efficacy in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(6):1759-1771. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07217-x. Epub 2019 Feb 12. — View Citation
Cianchi F, Indennitate G, Paoli B, Ortolani M, Lami G, Manetti N, Tarantino O, Messeri S, Foppa C, Badii B, Novelli L, Skalamera I, Nelli T, Coratti F, Perigli G, Staderini F. The Clinical Value of Fluorescent Lymphography with Indocyanine Green During Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer: a Matched Cohort Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Oct;24(10):2197-2203. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04382-y. Epub 2019 Sep 4. — View Citation
Herrera-Almario G, Patane M, Sarkaria I, Strong VE. Initial report of near-infrared fluorescence imaging as an intraoperative adjunct for lymph node harvesting during robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;113(7):768-70. doi: 10.1002/jso.24226. Epub 2016 Mar 29. — View Citation
Kwon IG, Son T, Kim HI, Hyung WJ. Fluorescent Lymphography-Guided Lymphadenectomy During Robotic Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2019 Feb 1;154(2):150-158. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4267. — View Citation
Lee JH, Ryu KW, Kim CG, Kim SK, Choi IJ, Kim YW, Chang HJ, Bae JM, Hong EK. Comparative study of the subserosal versus submucosal dye injection method for sentinel node biopsy in gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005 Nov;31(9):965-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2005.03.006. — View Citation
Tajima Y, Yamazaki K, Masuda Y, Kato M, Yasuda D, Aoki T, Kato T, Murakami M, Miwa M, Kusano M. Sentinel node mapping guided by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in gastric cancer. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):58-62. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181927267. — View Citation
Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RS. Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the surgery task load index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):1961-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Total Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes | Total Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes | One month after surgery | |
Secondary | Total number of fluorescent lymph nodes in groups A and B | Total number of fluorescent lymph nodes in groups A and B | One month after surgery | |
Secondary | Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (true positive rate) | Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (true positive rate) | One month after surgery | |
Secondary | Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (false positive rate) | Relationship between fluorescent lymph nodes and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (false positive rate) | One month after surgery | |
Secondary | Relationship between non-fluorescent and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (true negative rate) | Relationship between non-fluorescent and negative lymph nodes in groups A and B (true negative rate) | One month after surgery | |
Secondary | Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (false negative rate) | Relationship between non-fluorescent lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes in groups A and B (false negative rate) | One month after surgery | |
Secondary | Number of Metastasis Lymph Nodes | Number of Metastasis Lymph Nodes | One month after surgery | |
Secondary | Metastasis rate of lymph node | Metastasis rate of lymph node | One month after surgery | |
Secondary | Mortality rates | This is for the early mortality, which defined as the event observed within 30 days after surgery. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Morbidity rates | This is for the incidence of early postoperative complications, which defined as the event observed within 30 days after surgery. | 30 days | |
Secondary | 3-year disease free survival rate | Disease-free survival is calculated from the day of surgery to the day of recurrence or death (When the specific date of recurrence of the tumor is unknown, the endpoint is the date of death due to tumor causes). If neither death nor recurrence of the tumor is observed, the endpoint is the final date that a patient is confirmed as relapse-free. (The final date of DFS: The last date of the outpatient visit day or the date of acceptance of the examination). | 36 months | |
Secondary | 3-year recurrence pattern | Recurrence patterns are classified into five categories at the time of first diagnosis: locoregional, hematogenous, peritoneal, distant lymph node, and mixed type. | 36 months | |
Secondary | Time to first ambulation | Time to first ambulation in hours is used to assess the postoperative recovery course. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Time to first flatus | Time to first flatus in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Time to first liquid diet | Time to first liquid diet in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Time to first soft diet | Time to first soft diet in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Duration of postoperative hospital stay | Duration of postoperative hospital stay in days is used to assess the postoperative recovery course. | 30 days | |
Secondary | The variation of weight | The variation of weight on postoperative 3, 6, 9 and 12 months are used to access the postoperative nutritional status and quality of life. | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months | |
Secondary | The variation of BMI in kg/m^2 | The variation of BMI in kg/m^2 on postoperative 3, 6, 9 and 12 months are used to access the postoperative nutritional status and quality of life. | 3, 6, 9 and 12 months | |
Secondary | Intraoperative morbidity rates | The intraoperative postoperative morbidity rates are defined as the rates of event observed within operation. | 1 day | |
Secondary | The variation of white blood cell count | The values of white blood cell count from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response. | Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days | |
Secondary | The variation of hemoglobin | The values of hemoglobin in gram/liter from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response. | Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days | |
Secondary | The variation of C-reactive protein | The values of C-reactive protein IN milligram/liter from peripheral blood before operation and on postoperative day 1, 3, 5 are recorded to access the inflammatory and immune response. | Preoperative 3 days and postoperative 1, 3, and 5 days | |
Secondary | Lymph node noncompliance rate | Lymph node noncompliance was defined as the absence of lymph nodes that should have been excised from more than 1 lymph node station. Major lymph node noncompliance was defined as more than 2 intended lymph node stations that were not removed. | 1 day | |
Secondary | Modified EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT14) | Participants were asked to complete one modified European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) IN-PATSAT14 questionnaire before their discharge from hospital. | 30 days | |
Secondary | The Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX) | Surgeons were required to complete one modified SURG-TLX questionnaire for each procedure. | 1 day | |
Secondary | 3-year overall survival rate | The overall survival is calculated from the day of surgery until death or until the final follow-up date, whichever occurs first. For survival cases, the endpoint is the last date that survival was confirmed. If the loss to follow-up occurred, the endpoint is the final date that survival could be confirmed. | 36 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05551416 -
The EpiGASTRIC/EDGAR Project: New Strategies for the Early Detection and Prevention of Gastric Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT05518929 -
Hypoxia During Gastroenterological Endoscope Procedures Sedated With Ciprofol In Overweight Or Obesity Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06006390 -
CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03219593 -
Apatinib as the First-Line Therapy in Elderly Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05489211 -
Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05536102 -
The Effectiveness and Safety of XELOX and Tislelizumab + PLD for Resectable Gastric Cancer (LidingStudy)
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06010862 -
Clinical Study of CEA-targeted CAR-T Therapy for CEA-positive Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05415098 -
Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy of APG-5918 in Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04082364 -
Combination Margetuximab, Retifanlimab, Tebotelimab, and Chemotherapy Phase 2/3 Trial in HER2+ Gastric/GEJ Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03766607 -
Trastuzumab Beyond Progression in HER2 Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01924533 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of Olaparib in Combination With Paclitaxel to Treat Advanced Gastric Cancer.
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01641939 -
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Taxane in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05107674 -
A Study of NX-1607 in Adults With Advanced Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04908813 -
Study of HLX22 in Combanition With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Versus Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04249739 -
Pembrolizumab + Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (CapeOx) -HER2 Nagative and Pembrolizumab + Trastuzumab + Cisplatin/Capecitabine HER2 Positive
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05514158 -
To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of Disitamab Vedotin Combined With RC98 in the Treatment of Subjects With HER2-expressing Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer (Including AEG)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04931654 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7789 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03175224 -
APL-101 Study of Subjects With NSCLC With c-Met EXON 14 Skip Mutations and c-Met Dysregulation Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 |